Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/369,367

Lightweight Fabrics for Resistance from High-Velocity Projectiles

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 18, 2023
Examiner
THOMPSON, CAMIE S
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
967 granted / 1319 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1319 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s amendment and accompanying remarks filed November 13, 2025 are acknowledged. Examiner acknowledges amended claims 1-9, 14-16 and 23-24. The rejection of claims 3, 14-15 and 23-24 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph is overcome by Applicant’s amendment. The rejection of claims 1-6, 9-13 and 16-22 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) & (a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhu et al., U.S. pre Grant Publication 2003/0226612 is overcome by Applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rendered indefinite because the phrase “reinforcing ripstop ribs” lacks antecedent basis. Claim 1 is rendered indefinite because it is unclear as to what the phrase “at regular intervals garments” refers. It is unclear as to what “garments” refer to in the claim. The term “garments” is defined as clothing; dress; clothes; apparel or attire. As written, it appears as though the term “garments” is being used in some manner to space apart the multi-filament yarns at regular intervals along the warp and weft directions. For purposes of examination, Examiner is interpreting the claim to refer to continuous multi-filament yarns spaced at regular intervals along the warp and weft directions of the reinforced fabric. Claims 2-8 are rendered indefinite as claims 2-8 are dependent upon indefinite claim 1. Claim 9 is rendered indefinite because the phrase “reinforcing ripstop ribs” lacks antecedent basis. Claim 9 is rendered indefinite because it is unclear as to what the phrase “at regular intervals garments” refers. It is unclear as to what “garments” refer to in the claim. The term “garments” is defined as clothing; dress; clothes; apparel or attire. As written, it appears as though the term “garments” is being used in some manner to space apart the multi-filament yarns at regular intervals along the warp and weft directions. For purposes of examination, Examiner is interpreting the claim to refer to continuous multi-filament yarns spaced at regular intervals along the warp and weft directions of the reinforced fabric. Claims 10-15 are rendered indefinite as claims 10-15 are dependent upon indefinite claim 9. Claim 16 is rendered indefinite because the phrase “reinforcing ripstop ribs” lacks antecedent basis. Claim 16 is rendered indefinite because it is unclear as to what the phrase “at regular intervals garments” refers. It is unclear as to what “garments” refer to in the claim. The term “garments” is defined as clothing; dress; clothes; apparel or attire. As written, it appears as though the term “garments” is being used in some manner to space apart the multi-filament yarns at regular intervals along the warp and weft directions. For purposes of examination, Examiner is interpreting the claim to refer to continuous multi-filament yarns spaced at regular intervals along the warp and weft directions of the reinforced fabric. Claims 17-24 are rendered indefinite as claims 17-24 are dependent upon indefinite claim 9. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the present claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMIE S THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1530. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd, can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMIE S THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635468
HOLDING TOOL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630474
FORMALDEHYDE-FREE BINDER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE BINDERS UNDER CONTROLLED ACIDIC CONDITIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623948
OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM AND METHOD FOR DRAWING OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM
4y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624166
FILMS FOR MULTIPLE LAYERS ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616274
TEXTILES AND ARTICLES AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+10.5%)
3y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1319 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month