Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/371,473

SANITARY RV WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Oct 07, 2022 — provisional 63/413,989
Examiner
LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Smith Deborah Glode
OA Round
6 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
485 granted / 758 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.4%
+38.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/21/20269 has been entered. Election/Restrictions The status of the claims for this application is as follows. Claims 1 is currently pending. Claims 2-18 are cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sherburne (US 3289702) . 1. While features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431-32 (Fed. Cir. 1997). 2. A claim containing a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987). Re Clm 1: Sherburne discloses a fluid transfer device (see Figs. 1-6) comprising: an open hose (10), that has two end openings (see Fig. 3, at the left and right ends of 10), a first end and a second end (see Fig. 3, the left end and right end), the hose has an open split (see Fig. 2, the open top) that extends from its outer wall through its inner wall and from the first opening to the second opening creating a third opening traversing the entire length of the hose (see Fig. 2, 3, and 5), at least one sleeve (38 or 52). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A LINFORD whose telephone number is (571)270-3066. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES ALBERT LINFORD Examiner Art Unit 3679 03/02/2026 /Matthew Troutman/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 17 earlier events
Jan 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680903
MANIFOLD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680644
BLIND-MATE CONNECTOR AND LIQUID COOLING APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669208
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REINFORCING PIPING AND INSTALLING A PIPE ADAPTER
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12638115
Quick Pipe Connector
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12618498
PIN SWIVEL DESIGNS
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+33.8%)
3y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month