Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/371,880

METHOD OF PROCESSING BAUXITES TO PRODUCE ALUMINA

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Examiner
LANGEL, WAYNE A
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Obshchestvo S Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennost'Yu "Obedinennaya Kompaniya Rusal Inzhenerno-Tekhnologiche
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
1275 granted / 1622 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1622 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
CTNF 18/371,880 CTNF 60603 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 07-20-aia AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 07-21-aia AIA Claim (s 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over EP0203873 !A1) in view of DE2918520 (C2), further in view of Lepetit et al (US 4,650,653). EP0203873 !A1)discloses the Bayer process by attacking bauxite at a temperature between 100 and 170 C, then separated from the insoluble residues from the attack. (See claim 1 of the English translation.) Regarding claims 1-5, EP0203873 !A1) also discloses in Paragraph [0055] hat wash water from washing the red mud is recycled. The differences between the process disclosed by EP0203873! A1), and that recited in applicant’s claims, is that EP0203873! A1) does not disclose that the filtering step occurs at a temperature of at least 95 C, that the washing is carried out with hot water, and the water after washing the red mud is fed for dilution of the alumina slurry or dilution of the filtrate. DE2918520 (C2) discloses the Bayer process and discloses in Paragraph [0022] of the English translation that the red mud is washed with hot water at a temperature of 40 C or more. Lepetit et al disclose the Bayer process, and teach at col. 6, lines 43-50 that the water from washing the red mud is recycled as dilution liquor A4 , which would be for dilution of the alumina slurry after digestion of the bauxite. (See FIG. 1 and its description.). It would be obvious to filter the slurry at a temperature of at least 95C. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to do so, since EP0203873! A1) teaches in claim 1 that the bauxite attack occurs between 100 and 170C and then separated from the insoluble residues, with no indication that cooling occurs between those steps. It would be further obvious from DE2918520 (C2) to wash the red mud of EP0203873! A1) with hot water. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to do so, since DE2918520 (C2) discloses a hot water wash in Paragraph [0022] of the English translation, and the processes of EP0203873! A1) and DE2918520 (C2) are analogous in that both are directed to the Bayer process including the steps of filtration and washing of the red mud. It would be even further obvious from Lepetit et al to recycle the wash water of EP0203873! A1) for dilution of the slurry. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to do so, since Lepetit et al disclose such step in FIG.1, and EP0203873! A1) teaches in Paragraph [0055] that the wash liquor can be recycled. Regarding claim 6, it would be within the level of skill of one of ordinary skill in the art to determine a suitable rate of consumption of the hot water in the washing step. Regarding claim 7, centrifuges and filter presses are conventionally used in filtration processes. Regarding claim 8, EP0203873! A1) discloses in Paragraph [0055] is recycled directly to the precipitation . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, the term “hot water” is indefinite since the term “hot” is relative. The terms “specified concentrations” and “specified concentration” are indefinite, since it would not be ascertainable as to whether a given concentration is “specified”. In claim 6, it is indefinite as to what would constitute a “specific” rate of consumption. The other references are made of record for disclosing the Bayer process including filtration and washing of the red mud. . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE A LANGEL whose telephone number is (571) 272-1353. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:15 am to 4:15 pm.If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer can be reached at 571-270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WAYNE A LANGEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1736 Application/Control Number: 18/371,880 Page 2 Art Unit: 1736 Application/Control Number: 18/371,880 Page 3 Art Unit: 1736 Application/Control Number: 18/371,880 Page 4 Art Unit: 1736 Application/Control Number: 18/371,880 Page 5 Art Unit: 1736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599151
BIOCHARS, BIOCHAR EXTRACTS AND BIOCHAR EXTRACTS HAVING SOLUBLE SIGNALING COMPOUNDS AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING MATERIAL EXTRACTED FROM BIOCHAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590043
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING PLANT GROWTH AND ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583802
AUTONOMOUS DEVICE FOR IN-FIELD CONVERSION OF BIOMASS INTO BIOCHAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583801
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING FERTILIZER FROM A BIOGAS STREAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577179
Methods and Compositions for Soil Regeneration and Improved Soil Hydrology
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1622 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month