Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/373,413

MULTI-PART INVERTER FOR ELECTRICAL MACHINE WITH MULTIPLE WINDING SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Priority
Oct 06, 2022 — DE 10 2022 210 547.8
Examiner
LAUGHLIN, CHARLES S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
288 granted / 376 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
416
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
75.7%
+35.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 376 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/6/23 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lehn et al. (US 2021/0146792). Regarding claim 1, Lehn discloses (Fig. 2): An electric vehicle drive circuit (fig. 2) having comprising: a first inverter (inverter 1) with a first DC port (switch connected to Battery 1); and a second inverter (inverter 2) with a second DC port (switch connecting bottom of battery 2), the first DC port and the second DC port being connected in a series connection (connected in series through Vdc, ¶0075), wherein the series connection of the first DC port and the second DC port is connected to a battery interface (battery 1, Battery 2, V1, V2), the first and the second inverters each having a multiphase AC port (outputs of inverters to motor, i1a, i1b, i1c, i2a, i2b, i2c), and wherein the multiphase AC ports of the first and the second inverters form a multiphase machine interface (with motor, Ls, ¶0078-¶0081). Regarding claim 2, Lehn discloses (Fig. 2): further comprising a control circuit connected to control inputs of both, the first and the second inverters (not shown, ¶0010-¶0014), the control circuit being adapted to control the first and the second inverters in order to jointly provide a rotary current system at the multiphase machine interface (¶0014). Regarding claim 3, Lehn discloses (Fig. 2): wherein the control circuit is adapted to limit the voltages occurring at the DC ports to a voltage limit not greater than the sum of a given voltage tolerance gap and the half of the voltage occurring at the battery interface (each battery receives half the voltage, ¶0119-¶0120) Regarding claim 4, Lehn discloses (Fig. 2): wherein each of the inverters having has a rating voltage lower than the operating voltage of the battery interface (¶0073) Regarding claim 5, Lehn discloses (Fig. 2): wherein a first capacitor is connected in parallel to the first DC port and a second capacitor is connected in parallel to the second DC port (C1, C2, each capacitor is connected in parallel with each port and the batteries, ¶0073). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lehn et al. (US 2021/0146792) in view of Namjabadi et al. (US 2019/0126760). Regarding claim 6, Lehn discloses the above elements from claim 1 above. They do not disclose: further comprising an electrical machine having a first and a second winding system, both winding systems operating the same rotor of the electrical machine, both inverters being adapted to jointly provide a single, rotary current system at the multiphase machine interface. However, Namjabadi teaches (Fig. 6): further comprising an electrical machine having a first and a second winding system (fig. 6, 52, 54, ¶0025), both winding systems operating the same rotor of the electrical machine (¶0026), both inverters being adapted to jointly provide a single, rotary current system at the multiphase machine interface (¶0026). Regarding claim 6, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the dual inverter system that uses the open ended windings of the motor using two inverters to raise or lower the dc voltage in order to charge the batteries as a raised or lowered voltage level without an intermediate DC/DC converter as disclosed by Lehn (¶0078-¶0079) and use the dual winding motor from Namjabadi that also uses the windings to change the voltage and charge the batteries using an inverter without an intermediate DC/DC converter (¶0027-¶0029). This would lower costs as an intermediate DC/DC converter is not needed and would improve reliability by using fewer electronic components. Regarding claim 7, Lehn discloses the above elements from claim 6 above. They do not disclose: further comprising a DC charging interface being connected to a star point of a first of the winding systems and to a connector of the battery interface. However, Namjabadi teaches (Fig. 6): further comprising a DC charging interface (Fig. 6, S1, S2) being connected to a star point of a first of the winding systems and to a connector of the battery interface (connected to first start winding through DC bus and inverter, via S1 and S2, ¶0027). Regarding claim 7, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the dual inverter system that uses the open ended windings of the motor using two inverters to raise or lower the dc voltage in order to charge the batteries as a raised or lowered voltage level without an intermediate DC/DC converter as disclosed by Lehn (¶0078-¶0079) and use the dual winding motor from Namjabadi that also uses the windings to change the voltage and charge the batteries using an inverter without an intermediate DC/DC converter (¶0027-¶0029). This would lower costs as an intermediate DC/DC converter is not needed and would improve reliability by using fewer electronic components. Regarding claim 8, Lehn discloses the above elements from claim 7 above. They do not disclose: wherein the DC charging interface comprises two voltage connectors, wherein a capacitive series connection is connected to the two voltage connectors, the capacitive series connection having a junction point connected to a star point of a second of the winding systems. However, Namjabadi teaches (Fig. 6): wherein the DC charging interface comprises two voltage connectors (Fig. 6, S1, S2), wherein a capacitive series connection is connected to the two voltage connectors (capacitor in upper inverter, ¶0027), the capacitive series connection having a junction point connected to a star point of a second of the winding systems (connected through inverter switches in inverter 56, ¶0027). Regarding claim 8, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the dual inverter system that uses the open ended windings of the motor using two inverters to raise or lower the dc voltage in order to charge the batteries as a raised or lowered voltage level without an intermediate DC/DC converter as disclosed by Lehn (¶0078-¶0079) and use the dual winding motor from Namjabadi that also uses the windings to change the voltage and charge the batteries using an inverter without an intermediate DC/DC converter (¶0027-¶0029). This would lower costs as an intermediate DC/DC converter is not needed and would improve reliability by using fewer electronic components. Regarding claim 9, Lehn discloses the above elements from claim 6 above. They do not disclose: wherein the circuit is adapted to operate the inverters, together with the inductances provided by the winding system, as at least one DCDC converter converting the DC voltages at star points of the winding systems and between one of these star points and a connector of the battery interface into voltages provided at the DC ports of the inverters. However, Namjabadi teaches (Fig. 6): wherein the circuit is adapted to operate the inverters, together with the inductances provided by the winding system, as at least one DC/DC converter converting the DC voltages at star points of the winding systems and between one of these star points and a connector of the battery interface into voltages provided at the DC ports of the inverters (¶0027). Regarding claim 9, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the dual inverter system that uses the open ended windings of the motor using two inverters to raise or lower the dc voltage in order to charge the batteries as a raised or lowered voltage level without an intermediate DC/DC converter as disclosed by Lehn (¶0078-¶0079) and use the dual winding motor from Namjabadi that also uses the windings to change the voltage and charge the batteries using an inverter without an intermediate DC/DC converter (¶0027-¶0029). This would lower costs as an intermediate DC/DC converter is not needed and would improve reliability by using fewer electronic components. Regarding claim 10, Lehn discloses the above elements from claim 1 above. They do not disclose: wherein the inverters each have the a same number of inverter phases and wherein the multiphase AC ports each have the same number of port phases identical to the inverter phases, the inverters being adapted to operate all or only a subgroup of all the port phases. However, Namjabadi teaches (Fig. 6): wherein the inverters each have the a same number of inverter phases and wherein the multiphase AC ports each have the same number of port phases identical to the inverter phases, the inverters being adapted to operate all or only a subgroup of all the port phases (¶0027). Regarding claim 10, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to take the dual inverter system that uses the open ended windings of the motor using two inverters to raise or lower the dc voltage in order to charge the batteries as a raised or lowered voltage level without an intermediate DC/DC converter as disclosed by Lehn (¶0078-¶0079) and use the dual winding motor from Namjabadi that also uses the windings to change the voltage and charge the batteries using an inverter without an intermediate DC/DC converter (¶0027-¶0029). This would lower costs as an intermediate DC/DC converter is not needed and would improve reliability by using fewer electronic components. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Jeong et al. (US 2023/0017022) – vehicle battery charger system Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES S LAUGHLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7244. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at (571) 272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.S.L./Examiner, Art Unit 2846 /KAWING CHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638010
MOTOR-DRIVEN COMPRESSOR FOR VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637894
SLIDING-DOOR DRIVE UNIT FOR A VEHICLE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633736
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE WITH SOLID STATE CIRCUIT BREAKER
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611696
VIBRATORY ACTUATOR AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12597871
A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING N BIPOLAR AC PHASE VOLTAGES
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 12m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 376 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month