Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/375,727

Automated Recipe Generation

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Examiner
JARRETT, RYAN A
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Emerson Electric Co.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
714 granted / 883 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
910
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-25 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/06/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-18, 20-23, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Putman et al. US 2020/0293019 (“Putnam”). Putnam discloses: 1. A method of automatically generating a process definition for an industrial process to create a product in an industrial plant, the method comprising: capturing sensor data including one or more of: images of an individual, videos of the individual, or location data of the individual, captured as the individual performs a set of process operations to a set of process materials to make a product (e.g., [0035]: “Multiple imaging devices can be used to capture the operator's motions and his interactions with the product of manufacture that he is assembling to generate video, images and/or 3D point cloud data.”); analyzing the captured sensor data (e.g., [0035]: “The captured data can provide granular information such as: an operator's hand coordinates in relation to the product of manufacture as it is being assembled, the relationship of one hand to another, and the relationship of the fingers (and in some embodiments, the joints in the fingers) to the product of manufacture as it is being assembled.”); and identifying, based on analyzing the captured sensor data, a process definition defining how the product is made, the process definition including one or more of: the set of process materials for making the product, one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a sequence of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a timing of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, or quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process to make the product (e.g., [0035]: “The data collected from the skilled operator can be used as a ground truth for assembly of an optimal/desired product of manufacture”). 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor data includes audio data, associated with the individual, captured as the individual performs one or more process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0021], [0030], [0035]). 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor data includes data from sensors associated with one or more equipment involved in the set of process operations (e.g., [0018]-[0019], [0035], [0069], [0077]). 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor data includes location sensor data associated with one or more process materials of the set of process materials, or one or more equipment involved in the set of process operations (e.g., [0018]-[0019], [0035], [0069], [0077]). 5. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the sensor data includes analyzing audio data to identify words or phrases spoken by the individual as the individual performs one or more process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0021], [0030], [0035]). 7. A system for automatically generating a process definition for an industrial process to create a product in an industrial plant, the system comprising: one or more sensors configured to capture sensor data including one or more of: images of an individual, videos of the individual, audio of the individual, or location data of the individual, captured as the individual performs a set of process operations to a set of process materials to make a product (e.g., [0035]: “Multiple imaging devices can be used to capture the operator's motions and his interactions with the product of manufacture that he is assembling to generate video, images and/or 3D point cloud data.”); one or more processors (e.g., [0071]); a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (e.g., [0071]), cause the one or more processors to: analyze the captured sensor data (e.g., [0035]: “The captured data can provide granular information such as: an operator's hand coordinates in relation to the product of manufacture as it is being assembled, the relationship of one hand to another, and the relationship of the fingers (and in some embodiments, the joints in the fingers) to the product of manufacture as it is being assembled.”); and identify, based on analyzing the captured sensor data, a process definition defining how the product is made, the process definition including one or more of: the set of process materials for making the product, one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a sequence of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a timing of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, or quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process to make the product (e.g., [0035]: “The data collected from the skilled operator can be used as a ground truth for assembly of an optimal/desired product of manufacture”). 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the sensor data includes audio data, associated with the individual, captured as the individual performs one or more process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0021], [0030], [0035]). 9. The system of claim 7, wherein the sensor data includes data from sensors associated with one or more equipment involved in the set of process operations (e.g., [0018]-[0019], [0035], [0069], [0077]). 10. The system of claim 7, wherein the sensor data includes location sensor data associated with one or more process materials of the set of process materials, or one or more equipment involved in the set of process operations (e.g., [0018]-[0019], [0035], [0069], [0077]). 11. The system of claim 7, wherein analyzing the sensor data includes analyzing audio data to identify words or phrases spoken by the individual as the individual performs one or more process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0021], [0030], [0035]). 12. The system of claim 7, further comprising a user interface, and wherein the computer-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to: provide the identified process definition via the user interface (e.g., [0015]-[0017]); receive, via the user interface, an adjustment of one or more of: the set of process materials for making the product, the one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, the sequence of the set of process operations, the timing of the set of process operations, or the quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process (e.g., [0020]: “altering operator instructions/guidance provided to various stations”); and update the process definition based on the adjustment received via the user interface (e.g., [0020]: “altering operator instructions/guidance provided to various stations”). 13. A method of automatically generating a configuration hierarchy for a process definition for an industrial process to create a product in an industrial plant, the method comprising: analyzing sensor data including one or more of: images of an individual, videos of the individual, audio of the individual, or location data of the individual, captured as the individual performs a set of process operations to a set of process materials to make a product (e.g., [0035]: “The captured data can provide granular information such as: an operator's hand coordinates in relation to the product of manufacture as it is being assembled, the relationship of one hand to another, and the relationship of the fingers (and in some embodiments, the joints in the fingers) to the product of manufacture as it is being assembled.”); identifying, based on analyzing the sensor data, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product and one or more equipment used in each of the process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0035]: “The data collected from the skilled operator can be used as a ground truth for assembly of an optimal/desired product of manufacture”); and determining, based on the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product and the one or more equipment used in each of the process operations of the set of process operations, a hierarchy level of the industrial plant associated with each of the process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0025]-[0026], [0043]). 14. A system for automatically generating a configuration hierarchy for a process definition for an industrial process to create a product in an industrial plant, the system comprising: one or more processors (e.g., [0071]); a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (e.g., [0071]), cause the one or more processors to: analyze sensor data including one or more of: images of an individual, videos of the individual, audio of the individual, or location data of the individual, captured as the individual performs a set of process operations to a set of process materials to make a product (e.g., [0035]: “Multiple imaging devices can be used to capture the operator's motions and his interactions with the product of manufacture that he is assembling to generate video, images and/or 3D point cloud data.”); identify, based on analyzing the sensor data, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product and one or more equipment used in each of the process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0035]: “The data collected from the skilled operator can be used as a ground truth for assembly of an optimal/desired product of manufacture”); and determine, based on the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product and the one or more equipment used in each of the process operations of the set of process operations, a hierarchy level of the industrial plant associated with each of the process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., [0025]-[0026], [0043]). 15. A method of visualizing a process definition for an industrial process to create a product in an industrial plant, the method comprising: analyzing sensor data including one or more of: images of an individual, videos of the individual, audio of the individual, or location data of the individual, captured as the individual performs a set of process operations to a set of process materials to make a product (e.g., [0018], [0035]: “Multiple imaging devices can be used to capture the operator's motions and his interactions with the product of manufacture that he is assembling to generate video, images and/or 3D point cloud data.”); identifying, based on analyzing the sensor data, a process definition defining how the product is made, the process definition including one or more of: the set of process materials for making the product, one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a sequence of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a timing of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, or quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process to make the product (e.g., [0015]-[0018], [0035]: “The data collected from the skilled operator can be used as a ground truth for assembly of an optimal/desired product of manufacture”); generating, based on analyzing the sensor data associated with the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product, a visualization of the set of process operations being performed to the set of process materials to make the product, wherein the visualization illustrates one or more of the set of process materials for making the product, the one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, the sequence of the set of process operations, the timing of the set of process operations, or the quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process (e.g., [0015]-[0017]); and providing, via a user interface, the visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product (e.g., [0015]-[0017]). 16. The method of claim 15, wherein providing the visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product includes providing an augmented reality (AR) visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product (e.g., [0015], [0017]). 17. The method of claim 16, wherein providing the AR visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product includes providing the AR visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product, overlaid upon a process environment in which the sensor data associated with the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product was captured (e.g., [0015]-[0017]). 18. The method of claim 15, further comprising: receiving input from a user requesting a particular process operation of the set of process operations (e.g., [0060]: “input parameters”); and providing, via the user interface, the visualization of the particular process operation of the set of process operations, isolated from the set of process operations, based on the input from the user (e.g., [0060]: “The CAD system may then generate a three-dimensional CAD model that represents the configuration of the output at each step”). 20. A system for visualizing a process definition for an industrial process to create a product in an industrial plant, the system comprising: a user interface (e.g., [0071]); one or more processors (e.g., [0071]); a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (e.g., [0071]), cause the one or more processors to: analyze sensor data including one or more of: images of an individual, videos of the individual, audio of the individual, or location data of the individual, captured as the individual performs a set of process operations to a set of process materials to make a product (e.g., [0018]); identify, based on analyzing the sensor data, a process definition defining how the product is made, the process definition including one or more of: the set of process materials for making the product, one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a sequence of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, a timing of the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, or quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process to make the product (e.g., [0015]-[0018]); generate, based on analyzing the sensor data associated with the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product, a visualization of the set of process operations being performed to the set of process materials to make the product, wherein the visualization illustrates one or more of the set of process materials for making the product, the one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, the sequence of the set of process operations, the timing of the set of process operations, or the quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process (e.g., [0015]-[0017]); and provide, via the user interface, the visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product (e.g., [0015]-[0017], [0066]-[0074]). 21. The system of claim 20, wherein providing the visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product includes providing an augmented reality (AR) visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product (e.g., [0015], [0017]). 22. The system of claim 21, wherein providing the AR visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product includes providing the AR visualization of the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product, overlaid upon a process environment in which the sensor data associated with the individual performing the set of process operations to the set of process materials to make the product was captured (e.g., [0015], [0017]). 23. The system of claim 20, wherein the computer-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to: receive input from a user requesting a particular process operation of the set of process operations (e.g., [0060]: “input parameters”); and provide, via the user interface, the visualization of the particular process operation of the set of process operations, isolated from the set of process operations, based on the input from the user (e.g., [0060]: “The CAD system may then generate a three-dimensional CAD model that represents the configuration of the output at each step”). 25. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing, via a user interface, the identified process definition (e.g., [0015]-[0017]); receiving, via the user interface, an adjustment of one or more of: the set of process materials for making the product, the one or more equipment used to make the product, the set of process operations applied to the set of process materials to make the product, the sequence of the set of process operations, the timing of the set of process operations, or the quantity information regarding the set of process materials used in the industrial process (e.g., [0020]: “altering operator instructions/guidance provided to various stations”); and updating the process definition based on the adjustment received via the user interface (e.g., [0020]: “altering operator instructions/guidance provided to various stations”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Putman in view of Mehrotra et al. US 2021/0150438 (“Mehrotra”). Putnam does not explicitly disclose the features of claims 19 and 24. Mehrotra (in combination with Putnam) discloses: 19. The method of claim 15, further comprising: receiving input from a user indicating a request to increase or decrease a speed associated with the visualization of one or more process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., Fig. 12, claim 15, claim 19: “receiving an input at the computing device, wherein the input is indicative of an instruction to continue to a second instruction”); and providing, via the user interface, a slowed-down or sped-up visualization of the one or more process operations of the set of process operations based on the input from the user (e.g., Fig. 12, claim 15, claim 19: “receiving an input at the computing device, wherein the input is indicative of an instruction to continue to a second instruction”). 24. The system of claim 20, wherein the computer-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to: receive input from a user indicating a request to increase or decrease a speed associated with the visualization of one or more process operations of the set of process operations (e.g., Fig. 12, claim 15, claim 19: “receiving an input at the computing device, wherein the input is indicative of an instruction to continue to a second instruction”); and provide, via the user interface, a slowed-down or sped-up visualization of the one or more process operations of the set of process operations based on the input from the user (e.g., Fig. 12, claim 15, claim 19: “receiving an input at the computing device, wherein the input is indicative of an instruction to continue to a second instruction”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Putnam with Mehrotra in order to allow someone to view the instructional sequence of Putnam at a faster pace in order to get to the portion of the tutorial sequence they are concerned with. This prevents them from wasting time viewing instructions that are not pertinent to them or that they are already familiar with. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN A JARRETT whose telephone number is (571)272-3742. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at 571-272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN A JARRETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116 10/10/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759220
NOZZLE FAILURE PREDICTION AND OBJECT QUALITY DETERMINATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752387
NUMERIC CONTROL MACHINE TOOL
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756195
MICROGRID NETWORK CHARACTERIZATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752388
TOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND TOOL MANAGEMENT DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749130
ENERGY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month