Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/376,513

Connection Establishment

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Priority
Apr 05, 2021 — provisional 63/170,809 +1 more
Examiner
MIZRAHI, DIANE D
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1273 granted / 1379 resolved
+30.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1416
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§103
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1379 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending for examination. Examiner’s Remarks Claims 1-20 are presented for examination, based on Applicant’s amendment of September 8, 2026, see new final office action below: Examiner formally withdraws the objection to the specification. Applicant argues that Mildh does not teach, “an index value of an establishment cause”. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Mildh teaches “an index value of an establishment cause”. (i.e., selection considers information such as, but not limited to, availability of network slices at the network (e.g., within the UE registration area), the active network slices for the UE, the network slices that the UE is registered to or connected to, and the network slices that the UE is allowed to access, e.g., based on subscription information. In one embodiment, the selection comprises selecting an RFSP index value.) Para [0148]; (i.e., selected RFSP index value is communicated to a RAN, which can then set UE-specific cell reselection priorities to control idle mode camping, e.g., to ensure that the UE camps on a frequency layer or RAT that supports the slices that the UE is connected to. This solution can also be used to control the active mode (e.g., handover) mobility to steer UEs to the preferred frequency layer or RAT that supports the UE slices) Para [0180]; Para [0182]; Para [0393], for example. Applicant argues, “mapped to a service type” is not taught by Mildh. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Mildh teaches “mapped to a service type” (i.e., The RFSP Index is mapped by the RAN to locally defined configuration in order to apply specific RRM strategies.) Para [0056]; (i.e., the RAN node 312 performs mapping to a mobility policy for UE active or idle mobility based on an index parameter and also slice information and/or subscription information provided by a CN node. In these embodiments, the RAN 312 performs the mapping to “UE-specific cell reselection priorities” based on index parameter as well as slice and/or subscription info provided by the CN. In some embodiments, this information can be combined with knowledge of, or based on, subscription related information or other information (e.g. Gold/Silver/Bronze subscription, Public Safety subscriptions, etc.) to set the value of the index parameter) Para [0182]. Applicant argues that Mildh does not teach “RRC signaling includes a connect request nor that the RRC signaling includes a index value”. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Applicant did not specifically claim, “RRC signaling includes a connect request nor that the RRC signaling includes a index value”. Applicant did not specifically claim, “RRC signaling includes a connect request nor that the RRC signaling includes a index value”. Therefore, this point is moot. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gunnar Mildh (US Publication No. 2020/0337050 A1 and Mildh hereinafter). Regarding Claims 1, 8 and 15, Mildh teaches a method comprising: receiving, by a wireless device (i.e. wireless network) Para [0151] from a core network node (i.e. radio access node) Para [0213]: an indicator of a service type (i.e. operations) Para [0163] and (i.e., nodes work together and are managed via Management and Orchestration (MANO) 5100, which, among others, oversees lifecycle management of applications) Para [0217] wherein the indicator comprises a single network selection assistance information (S-NSSAI) Para [0389]; and an index value of an establishment cause (i.e., The AMF stores the subscribed RFSP Index value received and the RFSP Index value in use. During the Registration Update procedure, the AMF may update the RFSP Index value in use (e.g., the AMF may need to update the RFSP Index value in use if the UE related context information in the AMF has changed). When the RFSP Index value in use is changed, the AMF immediately provides the updated RFSP Index value in use to NG RAN node by modifying an existing UE context or by establishing a new UE context in RAN or by being configured to include the updated RFSP Index value in use in the DOWNLINK NAS TRANSPORT message if the user plane establishment is not needed) Para [0066] mapped (i.e., mapped) Para [0009]; [0053] and (i.e., RAN 312 performs the mapping to “UE-specific cell reselection priorities” based on index parameter as well as slice and/or subscription info provided by the CN. In some embodiments, this information can be combined with knowledge of, or based on, subscription related information or other information (e.g. Gold/Silver/Bronze subscription, Public Safety subscriptions, etc.) to set the value of the index parameter) Para [0182] to a service type (i.e., service type) Para [0008]; and sending, by the wireless device to a first base station (i.e., radio access network node or a base station.) Para [0221], a radio resource control (RRC) connection request message (i.e., his then triggers a UE initiated MM procedure including in Radio Resource Control (RRC) and Non-Access Stratum (NAS) signaling the new value of the new accepted NSSAI the network has provided) Para [0027] comprising the index value cause (i.e., The AMF stores the subscribed RFSP Index value received and the RFSP Index value in use. During the Registration Update procedure, the AMF may update the RFSP Index value in use (e.g., the AMF may need to update the RFSP Index value in use if the UE related context information in the AMF has changed). When the RFSP Index value in use is changed, the AMF immediately provides the updated RFSP Index value in use to NG RAN node by modifying an existing UE context or by establishing a new UE context in RAN or by being configured to include the updated RFSP Index value in use in the DOWNLINK NAS TRANSPORT message if the user plane establishment is not needed) Para [0066]. Regarding the newly added limitation, (amendment September 8, 2026,) “slice”, Mildh teaches the claimed, “slice” (i.e., frequency or RAT selection based on slice availability. In one aspect, a core network function is provided for determining information for RAT and/or frequency selection based on knowledge of network slices and providing that information to a RAN node, which may provide that information to a UE. The information may be a RFSP index or other index parameter, which may be set based on subscription related information or other information. Slice knowledge may include knowledge of availability of network slices at the network, active slices for the UE, slices to which the UE is registered or connected, and/or slices to which the UE is allowed access. In another aspect, a RAN node performs mapping to mobility policies for UE active or idle mobility based on the determined information along) [Abstract]; (i.e., Network Slice Instance (NSI): a set of network functions, and resources to run these network functions, forming a complete instantiated logical network to meet certain network characteristics required by one or more service instances. A NSI may be fully or partially, logically and/or physically isolated from another NSI. The resources include physical and logical resources. A NSI may be comprised of sub-network instances, which may be shared by multiple NSIs. A NSI may be defined by a network slice blueprint) Para [0007] and Para [0020], for example. Regarding Claims 2,9 and 16, Mildh teaches further comprising sending, by the wireless device to the core network node, a first non-access stratum (NAS) message indicating the service type (i.e. A UE may provide NSSAI consisting of a set of parameters to the network to select the set of RAN and CN part of the NSIs 118 for the UE. If a network deploys network slicing, then it may use UE provided NSSAI to select a network slice (i.e., Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (NSSAI): information consisting of a set of parameters provided by a User Equipment (UE) to the network to select the set of RAN and CN part of the NSIs for the UE. This information includes, for each slice the UE is allowed to access, a Slice Service Type (SST) Para [0008]; and Para [0022-0023]. Regarding Claims 3,10 and 17, Mildh teaches further comprising receiving, by the wireless device from the core network node, a second NAS message comprising: the indicator of the service type; and the index value of the establishment cause mapped to the service type (i.e., selection considers information such as, but not limited to, availability of network slices at the network (e.g., within the UE registration area), the active network slices for the UE, the network slices that the UE is registered to or connected to, and the network slices that the UE is allowed to access, e.g., based on subscription information. In one embodiment, the selection comprises selecting an RFSP index value.) Para [0148]. Regarding Claims 4, 11 and 18, Mildh teaches further comprising releasing, by the wireless device, an RRC connection after receiving the second NAS (i.e. Non-Access Stratum) Para [0350] message (i.e., explicit reference to any intermediary devices and the precise routing of messages via these devices. Network infrastructure may determine the routing, which it may be configured to hide from UE 730 or from the service provider operating host computer) Para [0230]. Regarding Claims 5,12 and 19, Mildh teaches wherein the RRC connection Para [0379]. request Para [0379] comprises at least one of: a RRC registration request; or a RRC resume request Para [0379]. Regarding Claims 6, 13 and 20, Mildh teaches wherein the core network node comprises an access and mobility management function (AMF) (i.e., CN node comprises one of an Authentication Management Function (AMF) a Session Management Function (SMF) a Mobility Management Entity (MME) or a Home Subscriber Server (HSS) ) Para [0071]. Regarding Claims 7 and 14, Mildh teaches wherein the core network node and the first base station are associated with a first public land mobile network (PLMN) Para [0330]. Prior Art Made of Record The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mildh, G., (US Patent Publication No. 2020/0337050 A1), “FREQUENCY OR RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGY (RAT) SELECTION BASED ON SLICE AVAILABILITY” (October 22, 2020) discloses a core network function is provided for determining information for RAT and/or frequency selection based on knowledge of network slices and providing that information to a RAN node, which may provide that information to a UE. The information may be a RFSP index or other index parameter, which may be set based on subscription related information or other information. Slice knowledge includes knowledge of availability of network slices at the network, active slices for the UE, slices to which the UE is registered or connected, and/or slices to which the UE is allowed access. RAN node performs mapping to mobility policies for UE active or idle mobility based on the determined information along with slice or subscription information provided by a CN node. Ninglekhu et al., (US Patent Publication No. 20230052699 A1), “FREQUENCY RANGE DRIVEN NETWORK SLICING” (February 16, 2023) discloses Network Slice Selection Assistance information (NSSA1) may be signaled between User Equipment (UE) and a network. NSSA1 sent from the network to the UE. Operating Frequency Band (OFB) for each Single NSSAI(S-NSSA1) in the NSSAI, a Radio Access Technology (RAT) Frequency Selection Priority (RFSP) index, which the network configures as a part of UE access and mobility; subscription, during a UE registration procedure. RAT restrictions may be enhanced to indicate to the UE that certain slices are not accessible via certain RATs. A UE may be provided by the network with an alternative NSSAI and corresponding OFBs for each S-NSSAI thereby indicating to the UE that these S-NSSAI would have been allowed had they been requested. A UE may be able to choose an alternative Allowed NSSAI and send a registration update request to the network. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIANE D MIZRAHI whose telephone number is 571- 272-4079. The examiner can normally be reached on 7:30-3:30 PM (7:30 - 4:30 p.m.). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T. Slater can be reached on (571) 270-0375. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are (703) 872-9306 for regular communications and for After Final communication. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.qov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll free). /DIANE D MIZRAHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647 Diane.Mizrahi@USPTO.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 08, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772150
NETWORK ACCESS GUIDE METHOD, APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771504
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING TEMPORARY REFERENCE SIGNAL AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756455
TRANSMISSION SIGNAL COMPENSATION METHOD, NETWORK SIDE DEVICE AND TERMINAL
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757281
NESTED SEARCH SPACE ENHANCEMENTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750768
METHODS FOR DEVICES THAT DO NOT SUPPORT NTNS TO AVOID CELL SELECTION/(RE)SELECTION TO A CELL IN NTN
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+5.3%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1379 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month