Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/376,969

EFFICIENT ASSIGNMENT OF RESOURCE-INTENSIVE COMPUTING JOBS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 05, 2023
Examiner
RASHID, WISSAM
Art Unit
2195
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
SAP SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
572 granted / 654 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
679
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 654 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 12, 14, 15, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ferris et al. (US 2012/0137002). With respect to claim 1, Ferris discloses: A system comprising:at least one memory that stores instructions; and one or more processors configured by the instructions to perform operations comprising: generating, based on historical job data and a plurality of features of an unexecuted computing job, a resource intensity prediction indicating that the unexecuted computing job is predicted to be classified as resource intensive, the historical job data classifying each of a plurality of executed computing jobs as either resource intensive or non-resource intensive; determining a predicted resource intensity category of the unexecuted computing job, the predicted resource intensity category being selected from a plurality of resource intensity categories; accessing utilization data associated with one or more of a plurality of cloud- based job execution destinations; and assigning, based on the predicted resource intensity category and the utilization data, the unexecuted computing job to a selected job execution destination from among the plurality of cloud-based job execution destinations ([0034]-[0035], the intensity category has not been further elaborated in the claim. The broadest reasonable interpretation is “intensity category” is a mere prediction of the amount of resources the workload will demand be based on usage history). With respect to claim 12, Ferris discloses: wherein the plurality of features of the unexecuted computing job comprises at least one of: job submitter, job type, job submission time, or job start time (id.). With respect to claim 14, Ferris discloses: wherein the job execution destinations comprise at least one of: a job executor, a queue linked to a job executor, or a queue linked to a plurality of job executors ([0034]-[0035], workloads are reassigned resource servers). With respect to claim 15 and 18, they recite similar limitations as claim 1 and is therefore rejected under the same citations and rationale. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WISSAM RASHID whose telephone number is (571)270-3758. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aimee Li can be reached at (571)272-4169. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WISSAM RASHID/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2195
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 18, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603762
DATA TRANSFER USING A VIRTUAL TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591443
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING PARTICIPATION IN A BLOCKCHAIN ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591454
PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING DATA TO A PLURALITY OF PROCESSING UNITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578991
PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE WITH DISTRIBUTED REGISTER FILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572392
FLEXIBLE PARTITIONING OF GPU RESOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 654 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month