Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/377,799

METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 08, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, PHUONGCHAU BA
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apogee Networks, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
665 granted / 749 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 749 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 5-6, 8 & 10-17 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species B-I, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12-29-25. Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A of Claims 1-4, 7, 9 & 18-20 in the reply filed on 12-29-25 is acknowledged. Priority Applicant' s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application, PCT/CN2022/085243 filed 4-6-22, under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application Nos. CN202110381076.3, filed on 4-9-21 & CN202110400101.8 filed 4-14-21. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12-6-23. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were received on 10-8-23. These drawings are acceptable. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 2-4 & 18 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 2, line 4, ---and--- should be inserted before the 2nd occurrence of the word “the” Claim 3, line 4, ---and--- should be inserted before the 2nd occurrence of the word “the” Claim 4, line 2, ---and--- should be inserted before the word “the” Claim 18, line 2, “.” should be changed to ---;--- Claim 20, line 2, “.” should be changed to ---;--- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 7, 9 & 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1-2) as being anticipated by Zhang (US 2023/0397288 A1). Regarding Claim 1. Zhang (US 2023/0397288 A1) discloses A first node {Zhang: First Node 100b-Fig.1B} for wireless communications, comprising: a first transmitter, accompanying a first message, starting a first timer {Zhang: transmitting first message 101b-Fig.1B & maintaining a first timer 102b-Fig.1B}; transmitting the first message, the first message comprising a Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “the first message comprising an RRC signaling”}; transmitting a first field {Zhang: ¶0156-wherein “when the first message comprises a RRCResumeRequest, a resumeIdentity field comprised by the first message comprises 24 bits; when the first message comprises a RRCResumeRequest1, a resumeIdentity field comprised by the first message comprises 40 bits”, ¶0157 wherein “the first message comprises a resumeCause field”; ¶0166 wherein “the first message comprises a ReestablishmentCause field”; see also ¶0308-¶0309, ¶0318}; and a first receiver, monitoring a second message, the second message comprising an RRC signaling, the second message being used to respond to the first message {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “if a second message is received, and the second message being used as a response to the first message”}; as a response to any condition in a first condition set being satisfied, entering into a first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state {Zhang: step 103B, as a response to that the first timer is expired, switching from an RRC inactive state to a first RRC state 103b-Fig.1B; see also Figs.7A}; wherein if the second message is received, and as a response to the second message being received, stop the first timer {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “if a second message is received, as a response to receiving the second message, stopping the first timer”}; the first field is used to assist in determining a transmission of the second message {Zhang: ¶0582 wherein “the second message comprises a RRCRelease, and the RRCRelease does not comprise a SuspendConfig field; the second message indicates that the RRC state of the first node is the RRC idle state;” ¶0584 wherein “the second message comprises a RRCReject; the second message indicates that the RRC state of the first node is the RRC idle state”; In other words, the first node transmitting the first message comprising ResumeIdentity field, ResumeCause field, or ReestablishmentCause field, wherein the field being used to determine the transmission of the second message, e.g. RRCRelease (¶0582) or RRCReject (¶0584) which indicates the RRC state of the first node is the RRC Idle state, emphasis added}; two conditions in the first condition set are respectively the first timer being expired {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “as a response to that the first timer is expired, switches from an RRC inactive state to a first RRC state” is a first condition of the first condition set; see also s702b- (yes-s703b) in Fig.7B & ¶0788} and the second message being received {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “as a response to receiving the second message, stopping the first timer” is second condition of the first condition set; see also s702b-s704b (Yes-s705b) in Fig.7B & ¶0788}; the first RRC state is a candidate state in a first candidate state set, and the first candidate state set comprises RRC_IDLE state {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “the first RRC state is a candidate state in a first candidate state set, the first candidate state set comprising an RRC idle state”}. Regarding Claim 2. The first node according to claim 1, wherein the behavior of “as a response to any condition in a first condition set being satisfied, entering into a first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state” comprises: as a response to an expiration of the first timer, entering into the first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state {Zhang: ¶0284 wherein “as a response to that the first timer is expired, switches from an RRC inactive state to a first RRC state” is a first condition of the first condition set; see also s702b- (yes-s703b) in Fig.7B & ¶0788, ¶0399}; the second message not being received {Zhang: when the first timer is expired in s703B (Yes)-Fig.7B, the second message is inherently not received (e.g. s702b-No), emphasis added; see also ¶0396}; the first RRC state being RRC_IDLE state {Zhang: ¶0399 & ¶0402-wherein “the first RRC state is the RRC_IDLE state”}. Regarding Claim 3. (Currently Corrected) The first node according to claim 1, wherein the behavior of “as a response to any condition in a first condition set being satisfied, entering into a first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state” comprises: as a response to the second message being received, entering into [a] the first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state; the second message being received; {Zhang: ¶0034 wherein “if a second message is received, and the first timer is in the running state, as a response to receiving the second message, stopping the first timer; ¶0035 herein, the second message comprises an RRC signaling, and the second message is a response to the first message; the second message indicates the RRC state of the first node”; see also ¶0050-¶0052, ¶0100, ¶0402, ¶0471, ¶0582; In other words, upon receiving the second message’s indication of the RRC state, the first node entering the RRC state, wherein the RRC state is RRC-_IDLE state (¶0402 & ¶0582, ¶0584, ¶0590, ¶0591, ¶0720, ¶0722, ¶0727), emphasis added} the first RRC state being RRC_INACTIVE state {Zhang: ¶0399 & ¶0403-wherein “the first RRC state is the RRC inactive state”}, or, the first RRC state being RRC_IDLE state {Zhang: ¶0399 & ¶0402-wherein “the first RRC state is the RRC_IDLE state”}. Regarding Claim 4. The first node according to claim 1, wherein the first message comprises an RRCResumeRequest message {Zhang: ¶0154-wherein “the first message comprises a RRCResumeRequest”; see also ¶0156, ¶0306-¶0308}; the second message comprises an RRCRelease message {Zhang: ¶0386-wherein “the second message comprises a RRCRelease”; see also ¶0582-¶0583 & ¶0720-¶0721}. Regarding Claim 7. The first node according to claim 1, wherein accompanying a first message, not start the T319 {Zhang: ¶0189 wherein “the phrase that along with the first message, starting the first timer comprises that: transmitting the first message does not start a timer T319”}. Regarding Claim 9. The first node according to claim 1, wherein the first message comprises the first field {Zhang: ¶0156-wherein “when the first message comprises a RRCResumeRequest, a resumeIdentity field comprised by the first message comprises 24 bits; when the first message comprises a RRCResumeRequest1, a resumeIdentity field comprised by the first message comprises 40 bits”, ¶0157 wherein “the first message comprises a resumeCause field”; ¶0166 wherein “the first message comprises a ReestablishmentCause field”; see also ¶0308-¶0309, ¶0318}. Regarding Claim 18. (Currently Corrected) -Claim 18 is rejected with the same reasons as set forth in claim 1. A second node for wireless communications, comprising: a second receiver, receiving a first message, the first message comprising an RRC signaling[.]; receiving a first field; and a second transmitter, transmitting a second message, the second message comprising an RRC signaling, the second message being used to respond to the first message; wherein accompanying the first message, a first timer is started; as a response to any condition in a first condition set being satisfied, a transmitter of the first message enters into a first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state; if the second message is received, as a response to the second message being received, the first timer is stopped; the first field is used to assist in determining a transmission of the second message; two conditions in the first condition set are respectively the first timer being expired and the second message being received; the first RRC state is a candidate state in a first candidate state set, and the first candidate state set comprises RRC_IDLE state. Regarding Claim 19. -Claim 19 is rejected with the same reasons as set forth in claim 1. A method in a first node for wireless communications, comprising: accompanying a first message, starting a first timer; transmitting the first message, the first message comprising an RRC signaling; transmitting a first field; and monitoring a second message, the second message comprising an RRC signaling, the second message being used to respond to the first message; as a response to any condition in a first condition set being satisfied, entering into a first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state; wherein if the second message is received, and as a response to the second message being received, stop the first timer; the first field is used to assist in determining a transmission of the second message; two conditions in the first condition set are respectively the first timer being expired and the second message being received; the first RRC state is a candidate state in a first candidate state set, and the first candidate state set comprises RRC_IDLE state. Regarding Claim 20. (Currently Corrected) -Claim 20 is rejected with the same reasons as set forth in claim 1. A method in a second node for wireless communications, comprising: receiving a first message, the first message comprising an RRC signaling[.]; receiving a first field; and transmitting a second message, the second message comprising an RRC signaling, the second message being used to respond to the first message; wherein accompanying the first message, a first timer is started; as a response to any condition in a first condition set being satisfied, a transmitter of the first message enters into a first RRC state from RRC_INACTIVE state; if the second message is received, as a response to the second message being received, the first timer is stopped; the first field is used to assist in determining a transmission of the second message; two conditions in the first condition set are respectively the first timer being expired and the second message being received; the first RRC state is a candidate state in a first candidate state set, and the first candidate state set comprises RRC_IDLE state. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Li (US 2024/0389180 A1) discloses a sidelink communication apparatus, applicable to a second terminal as a target relay terminal for direct to indirect path switch of a first terminal as a remote terminal, including: a first receiver configured to receive an RRC reconfiguration complete (RRCReconfigurationComplete) message from the first terminal; first initiating processor circuitry configured to initiate an RRC connection setup procedure or an RRC resume procedure; and a first transmitter configured to transmit a first indication information to the first terminal when the RRC connection setup procedure or the RRC resume procedure fails {Figs.1-23}. Da Silva (US 10667185 B2) discloses that a method for avoiding unnecessary actions in a connection establishment comprises sending a request to a network node to initiate the connection establishment, upon sending the request to the network node, starting a timer for the connection establishment, wherein an expiration of the timer stops the connection establishment for a user equipment (UE), and stopping the timer to stop the connection establishment upon the UE receiving a suspend message or a release message, or upon the UE performing a cell reselection procedure while the timer is running. The timer may prevent the UE from waiting the connection establishment to be completed if there is an error or bad transmission in the connection establishment. Furthermore, the timer to stop the connection establishment may avoid unnecessary actions and inform other layers in the network when the timer expires to stop the connection establishment. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUONGCHAU BA NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571) 272-3148. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:30 AM -5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RICKY NGO can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUONGCHAU BA NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12581424
A POWER SPECTRUM DENSITY BASED CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573767
TECHNIQUE FOR CONFIGURING SMART ANTENNA FOR WI-FI ACCESS POINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568454
SCALING FACTOR DESIGN FOR LAYER 1 REFERENCE SIGNAL RECEIVED POWER (L1-RSRP) MEASUREMENT PERIOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12556951
MACHINE LEARNING BASED NETWORK DRIVE TEST PRIORITIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543054
SIGNALLING SUPPORT FOR SPLIT ML-ASSISTANCE BETWEEN NEXT GENERATION RANDOM ACCESS NETWORKS AND USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 749 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month