Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/378,608

SHOE FIT EVALUATION DEVICE AND SHOE FIT EVALUATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Oct 10, 2023
Examiner
BENNETT, GEORGE B
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Asics Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
423 granted / 533 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
549
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 533 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 1 is directed to a device, which would fall into a statutory category of invention. However, the claim is directed to generic modules for acquiring data, storing data, calculating a difference and evaluating a matching rate. Specifically, these steps are no more than collecting information and analyzing it, similar to the limitations of Electrical Power Group and Classen Immunotherapies and are therefore a mental process. Further, these could also be interpreted as implementation of a mathematical relationship, similar to Parker v. Flook which was computing an alarm limit, and therefore are an abstract idea of math. Under step 2a prong two the claim is not taken to be integrated into a practical application because the implementation of these steps in a generic computer system does not tie them to any particular application. (The examiner notes that the October 2019 guidance specifically addresses that “a claim that requires a computer may still recite a mental process” in section C, II.) The preamble discussion of a “shoe fit” does not tie to any particular application as the body of the claim does not relate the mathematical computation to a fitting step. Further, under step 2b the claim does not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because implementation of any abstract idea in a computer, and the type of computer data storage have long been considered to be routine computer implementation and therefore not significantly more than the idea itself. The examiner further notes that the output is routine in any computer implementation. Dependent claims 2-17 fail to incorporate limitations amounting to more than the abstract idea of claim 1, as they further define the analysis used and are therefore abstract themselves and are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 18 recites the method of the device as described in claim 1, therefore, is directed to the same abstract ideas of claim 1 and fails to incorporate significantly more. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. BRADLEY BENNETT whose telephone number is 571.272.2237. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH, 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571.272.2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /GEORGE B BENNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 gbb 30 DEC 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Mar 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595996
SMALL-SIZED MEASURING DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590782
ARCHERY BOW SIGHT SUPPORT SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590789
FISH MEASURING BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590465
FRAMING BUDDY DECK FRAMING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584737
MEASUREMENT DEVICES WITH INTEGRAL ANGLE FINDER, SPIRIT LEVELS, AND CASTOR DEVICE PAIR FOR USE WITH LADDERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 533 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month