Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/378,840

UPTURNED ELECTRIC CONTROL BOX MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND HEAT PUMP DEVICE APPLYING SAME

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Oct 11, 2023
Examiner
RUPPERT, ERIC S
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Guangdong Warmhouse Technology Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

59%
Career Allow Rate
437 granted / 739 resolved
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
54 pending
793
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 7, the recitation “the supporting rod is rotatably connected to the first side frame and the second side frame” is unclear. First, it is unclear which support rod is being referred to, as multiple are previously claimed. Further, it is unclear if a single support rod is connected to both first and second side frames. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hwang (KR20060015974A) in view of Smith (US6330161B1). Regarding claim 1, Hwang teaches (see Fig. 2) an upturned electric control box mounting structure, comprising a connecting frame (see frame of air conditioner Fig. 2, to which hinges 11 are attached) and an electric control box assembly (control box 10), wherein the electric control box assembly is connected to the connecting frame in an upturned manner and is capable of being switched between an assembled state and an overhaul state through an overturning action, and the connecting frame is provided with a supporting mechanism (box support 20) for keeping the electric control box assembly in an overhaul state. Hwang does not teach the connecting frame is provided with a fixing mechanism for keeping the electric control box assembly in an assembled state. Smith teaches (see Fig. 4-6) the connecting frame is provided with a fixing mechanism (screw tabs 74/76) for keeping the electric control box assembly in an assembled state. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Hwang to include a fixing mechanism as taught by Smith, in order to hold the box assembly in place during operation (Col. 4, lines 30-35). Claim(s) 2-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hwang (CN20060015974A) in view of Smith (US6330161B1) and in further view of Long (CN204165216U). Regarding claim 2, Hwang teaches the limitations of claim 2, and Hwang further teaches and the electric control box assembly (10) is rotatably connected to the upper part of the frame through several groups of hinges (11). Hwang does not teach wherein the connecting frame comprises a first side frame and a second side frame, a first upper connecting pipe and a second upper connecting pipe are fixedly connected between the first side frame and the second side frame. Long teaches (see Fig. 1) the connecting frame (1) comprises a first side frame (14) and a second side frame (14), a first upper connecting pipe (12) and a second upper connecting pipe (12) are fixedly connected between the first side frame and the second side frame. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Hwang to include the framework configuration of Long, in order to provide a stable structure (Page 1). Regarding claim 3, Hwang teaches the limitations of claim 2, and Smith further teaches the fixing mechanism (screw tabs 74/76) comprises at least two groups of connecting plates detachably connected with the electric control box assembly, and at least one group of connecting plates are provided on the first side frame and the second side frame, respectively. Claim(s) 8-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hwang (CN20060015974A) in view of Smith (US6330161B1), Long (CN204165216U), and in further view of Chen (CN208720457U). Regarding claims 8-9, Hwang teaches the limitations of claim 3, and Smith further teaches and a box cover covered on the box body, and both sides of the box body are provided with abutting elements (see elements through which 44/46 extend) abutting against the connecting plate (74/76) respectively. Hwang does not teach the electric control box assembly comprises a box body, an electric control component provided in the box body, wherein the box body and the box cover are detachably connected through a fastening mechanism and a locking mechanism, the fastening mechanism comprises fastening flanges, which are provided at both sides of the box body, respectively, and fastening protrusions , which are provided at both sides of the box cover, respectively, and the fastening protrusions are in clamping connection with the fastening flanges; the locking mechanism comprises a positioning plate provided on the box body, the positioning plate is provided with a first through hole, and the box cover is provided with a second through hole; the box cover is further provided with a handle. Chen teaches the electric control box assembly (Fig. 1) comprises a box body (1), an electric control component (electric control - Page 1) provided in the box body, and a box cover (2) covered on the box body, wherein the box body and the box cover are detachably connected through a fastening mechanism (7 & 8) and a locking mechanism (bolt, page 1, through 11 & 12), the fastening mechanism comprises fastening flanges, which are provided at both sides of the box body, respectively, and fastening protrusions, which are provided at both sides of the box cover, respectively, and the fastening protrusions are in clamping connection with the fastening flanges; the locking mechanism comprises a positioning plate provided on the box body, the positioning plate is provided with a first through hole, and the box cover is provided with a second through hole; the box cover is further provided with a handle (15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Hwang to include the box of Chen, in order to provide a control box which is easy to install and assemble (Page 1). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hwang (CN20060015974A) in view of Smith (US6330161B1) and in further view of Xi (CN215260045U). Regarding claim 10, Hwang teaches the limitations of claim 1, and does not teach a heat pump device, comprising a tank body, a water tank assembly and a hydraulic module, wherein the upturned electric control box mounting structure is mounted on the tank body, and the water tank assembly and the hydraulic module are electrically connected with the electric control box assembly. Xi teaches a heat pump device (see Fig. 1), comprising a tank body (20), a water tank assembly (25/171/172) and a hydraulic module (10), wherein a movable electric control box (30) mounting structure is mounted on the tank body, and the water tank assembly and the hydraulic module are electrically connected with the electric control box assembly. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporate the upturned control box mounting structure into the heat pump device of Xi, in order to easily access the heat pump components (see abstract of Hwang). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC S RUPPERT whose telephone number is (571)272-9911. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC S RUPPERT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12578147
VARIED FLOW STACKED RADIATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578153
ATTACHMENT MEANS AND HEAT TRANSFER PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560390
GREY WATER HEAT RECOVERY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553674
MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY AND HEAT EXCHANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546539
HEAT EXCHANGE APPARATUS AND HEAT PUMP SYSTEM PROVIDED WITH SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+20.6%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner