Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/379,640

Temporal Quantum Assurance User Interface, Sandboxed Distributed Asset Router, and Edge Caching Datastructures Apparatuses, Processes and Systems

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 12, 2023
Examiner
POINVIL, FRANTZY
Art Unit
3693
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Warp Drive Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
756 granted / 953 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
995
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§103
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/17/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. [. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it contains a number at the beginning “[0182]” at line 1 at the beginning of the abstract.. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The Applicant’s argument and the Examiner’s response: The applicant’s representative argues that the 35 USC 112(a) rejection is in error. Applicant’s representative refers the Examiner to most notably figure 3 of their drawing as support for their claimed invention. In response, figure 3 fails to show, illustrate or recite the claimed: “provide temporal-fill asset datastructure to the temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface, in which temporal-fill asset datastructure includes an asset identifier, and a temporal-quantum value, in which temporal-fill asset datastructure is structured as including a trigger for the temporal- quantum-limited asset request user interface, in which the temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface is structured as employing the trigger for temporal-quantum-fill countdown user interface display element; obtain a temporal-fill asset request dastastructure from the triggered temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface, determine if temporal-fill asset request datastructure was obtained prior to expiration of the countdown user interface display element, and if obtainment was prior to the expiration, secure obtainment of an asset identified in the temporal-fill asset request datastructure”. A detailed explanation of these claimed features is not provided or adequately described in the specification as to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention as claimed. The claims also fail to provide enabling means or steps for performing these functions. The prior 35 USC 112 rejection is repeated below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-8 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. The specification still fails to provide a detailed or clear explanation of how to make and use the claimed functions of: "query a quantum-limited asset cache with temporal-quantum-limited asset request datastructure and the temporal-fill parameters datastructures, provide temporal-fill asset datastructure to the temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface, in which temporal-fill asset datastructure includes an asset identifier, and a temporal-quantum value, in which temporal-fill asset datastructure is structured as including a trigger for the temporal quantum- limited asset request user interface, in which the temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface is structured as employing the trigger for temporal-quantum-fill countdown user interface element, obtain a temporal-fill asset request datastructure from the triggered temporal- quantum-limited asset request user interface". The specification recites these claims, and fails to teach how to come up or enable these functions. These are essential elements needed to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and or use the invention. A detailed explanation of these claimed features is not provided or adequately described in the specification as to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention as claimed. Claims 1-8 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 1-8 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph based on the rationale noted above. Allowable Subject Matter The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 1-8 are allowable over the art of record. The prior art taken alone or in combination failed to teach or suggest: “query a quantum-limited asset cache with temporal-quantum-limited asset request data structure and the temporal-fill parameters data structures; provide temporal-fill asset data structure to the temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface, in which temporal-fill asset data structure includes an asset identifier, and a temporal- quantum value, in which temporal-fill asset data structure is structured as including a trigger for the temporal- quantum-limited asset request user interface, in which the temporal-quantum-limited asset request user interface is structured as employing the trigger for temporal-quantum-fill countdown user interface display element; obtain a temporal-fill asset request data structure from the triggered temporal-quantum- limited asset request user interface, determine if temporal-fill asset request data structure was obtained prior to expiration of the countdown user interface display element, and if obtainment was prior to the expiration, secure obtainment of an asset identified in the temporal-fill asset request data structure", as recited in in independent claim 1 and as similarly recited in independent claims 3, 5 and 7. The above recited limitations provide meaningful limitations that transforms the abstract idea into patent eligible. The claim as a whole effects an improvement to another technology or technical field. These limitations in combination provide meaningful limitations beyond generally linking the use of the abstract idea to a practical application. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANTZY POINVIL whose telephone number is (571)272-6797. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:00AM to 5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Anderson can be reached at 571-270-0508. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /fp/ /FRANTZY POINVIL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3693 March 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12548000
SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETPLACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12536543
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SUSPENDING ACCESS TO ACCOUNTS DUE TO INCAPACITY OF USER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12530663
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PAYMENT PLATFORM SELF-CERTIFICATION FOR PROCESSING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH PAYMENT NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12499437
MULTI-SIGNATURE VERIFICATION NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12450664
ASSESSING PROPERTY DAMAGE USING A 3D POINT CLOUD OF A SCANNED PROPERTY
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month