DETAILED ACTION
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed 6/23/2026.
Continued Examination
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/1/2026 has been entered.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention.
Regarding claim 4, cited term of “wherein the optical system component does not include a polarizer ” (line 1-2) is indefinite and lacks antecedent. Claim 4 depends on claim 1, however, neither claim 1 nor claim 4 specifies “an optical system component”. Cited “the optical system component” is undefined.
Therefore proper amendments are required in order to clarify the scopes of the claims and overcome the rejections.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 9 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Haertling et al (US 3741627).
Regarding Claim 9, Haertling teaches an optical system component (abstract; figs. 1-3), comprising
a single crystal (fig. 3, 22; col. 3, line 54-57, Structure 22 may thus be formed from any conventional ferroelectric crystals) having a top side, a bottom side, and two opposing middle sides (fig 3, 22, 36, 38, 44);
electrodes on the two opposing middle sides of the single crystal (fig. 3, 36, 38);
electrical contacts to provide voltage to the electrodes (fig. 3, 40, 42, fig. 1, 24; col. 4, line 9-20, structure 22 may be provided with electrodes 36 and 38 along two of the parallel edges thereof. When an electric field is produced between these electrodes by voltage applied to terminals 40 and 42 by voltage source 24); and
a compression stress source to apply stress to the top side of the single crystal (fig. 3, 20, 44; fig. 2, 20, 26; col. 3, line 48---col. 4, line 8, The ferroelectric and piezoelectric structure 22 is generally formed of a material which has a sufficiently large piezoelectric and/or electrostrictive strain to produce the desired strain in the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26; When the piezoelectric structure 22 expands or contracts in one dimension (the thickness or longitudinal direction) it generally contracts or expands respectively, in dimensions in a plane perpendicular thereto (planar or transverse directions) (--there is a compression stress source to cause piezoelectric structure 22 to contract). With ferroelectric member 20 appropriately mounted and attached to structure 22, member 20 may be subjected to desired stresses. In this electrooptic device, it is desirable that member 20 be subjected to a uniaxial stress in a plane parallel to the major surfaces of the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26).
Regarding Claim 11, Haertling teaches the component of claim 9, wherein the compression stress source comprises a bias stress stage, a bias stress connector rod, a ceramic sphere, and a crystal placement setting (fig. 1, 24; fig. 3, 34, 20; fig. 2, 20, 26; col. 3, line 48-66, The ferroelectric and piezoelectric structure 22 is generally formed of a material which has a sufficiently large piezoelectric and/or electrostrictive strain to produce the desired strain in the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26; Structure 22 is subjected to a voltage from voltage source 24 of appropriate amplitude and polarity between some dimensions of structure 22 which will cause the piezoelectric to contract or expand in that dimension).
Regarding Claim 12, Haertling teaches the component of claim 9, wherein the optical system component does not include a polarizer (fig. 1, 16; fig. 3, 22; ---no polarizer involved).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1 and 3 - 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Haertling et al (US 3741627).
Regarding Claim 1, Haertling teaches a method of light modulation (abstract; figs. 1-3), comprising
placing a single crystal in a device housing (fig. 1, 16, 20, 22),
wherein the single crystal (fig. 3, 22; col. 3, line 54-57, Structure 22 may thus be formed from any conventional ferroelectric crystals) has a top side, a bottom side, and two opposing middle sides (fig 3, 22, 36, 38, 44);
placing electrodes on the two opposing middle sides of the single crystal (fig. 3, 36, 38);
attaching electrical contacts to provide voltage to the electrodes and form an electric field (fig. 3, 40, 42, fig. 1, 24; col. 4, line 9-20, structure 22 may be provided with electrodes 36 and 38 along two of the parallel edges thereof. When an electric field is produced between these electrodes by voltage applied to terminals 40 and 42 by voltage source 24);
attaching a compression stress source to the top side of the single crystal (fig. 3, 20, 44; fig. 2, 20, 26; col. 3, line 48---col. 4, line 8, The ferroelectric and piezoelectric structure 22 is generally formed of a material which has a sufficiently large piezoelectric and/or electrostrictive strain to produce the desired strain in the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26; When the piezoelectric structure 22 expands or contracts in one dimension (the thickness or longitudinal direction) it generally contracts or expands respectively, in dimensions in a plane perpendicular thereto (planar or transverse directions) (--there is a compression stress source to cause piezoelectric structure 22 to contract). With ferroelectric member 20 appropriately mounted and attached to structure 22, member 20 may be subjected to desired stresses. In this electrooptic device, it is desirable that member 20 be subjected to a uniaxial stress in a plane parallel to the major surfaces of the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26),
applying the electric field to the single crystal; applying a compression stress to the crystal, or applying both (col. 4, line 9-20, structure 22 may be provided with electrodes 36 and 38 along two of the parallel edges thereof. When an electric field is produced between these electrodes by voltage applied to terminals 40 and 42 by voltage source 24; col. 3, line 48-66, The ferroelectric and piezoelectric structure 22 is generally formed of a material which has a sufficiently large piezoelectric and/or electrostrictive strain to produce the desired strain in the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26; Structure 22 is subjected to a voltage from voltage source 24 of appropriate amplitude and polarity between some dimensions of structure 22 which will cause the piezoelectric to contract or expand in that dimension);
dynamically switching a reversible phase transformation (col. 1, line 52 – 60, changes in birefringence are achieved by electrical fields produced between the major surfaces the plate; permits switching with relatively low amplitude voltages; col. 5, line 19- 30, the biasing strain in the electrooptic ceramic plate is controlled by the poling or switching voltage being applied to the piezoelectric substrate and the birefringence of the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26 is controlled by appropriate biases applied to transparent electrodes 28 and 30).
But Haertling does not specifically disclose that dynamically switching a reversible phase transformation between an opaque state and a transparent state of the single crystal.
However, Haertling teaches a dynamically switching of an electrooptic device (fig. 1, 16, 24, 10/12, 21; and see above col. 1, line 52 – 60 and col. 5, line 19- 30), --controlling parameters of voltage source 24 can modulating light intensities to the photon sensor 21 between states of about opaque state and about transparent state (see fig. 1, light beam 12 from 10 through 20/22 to 21) of the single crystal. Further, it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art, In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233 (C.C.P.A. 1955).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the light modulation of Haertling to have the dynamically switching a reversible phase transformation between an opaque state and a transparent state of the single crystal, for a purpose of a electro-optic modulator which permits switching with relatively low amplitude voltages and permits controlling of large areas or apertures of material with the same low voltages and fields (col. 1, line 55 - 60).
Regarding Claim 3, Haertling teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the compression stress source comprises a bias stress stage, a bias stress connector rod, a ceramic sphere, and a crystal placement setting (fig. 1, 24; fig. 3, 34, 20; fig. 2, 20, 26; col. 3, line 48-66, The ferroelectric and piezoelectric structure 22 is generally formed of a material which has a sufficiently large piezoelectric and/or electrostrictive strain to produce the desired strain in the ferroelectric ceramic plate 26; Structure 22 is subjected to a voltage from voltage source 24 of appropriate amplitude and polarity between some dimensions of structure 22 which will cause the piezoelectric to contract or expand in that dimension).
Regarding Claim 4, Haertling teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the optical system component does not include a polarizer fig. 1, 16; fig. 3, 22; ---no polarizer involved).
Claims 2, 10 and 13-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Haertling et al (US 3741627) in a view of Liu et al, “Ferroelectric crystals with giant electro-optic property enabling ultracompact Q-switches”, Science 376, 22 April 2022, p1–7.
Regarding Claim 2, Haertling discloses as set forth above, and further teaches comprising a single crystal (fig. 1, 16, 20, 22; fig. 3, 22).
But Haertling does not specifically disclose that wherein the crystal comprises Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3.
However, Liu teaches a electro-optic modulator (abstract), wherein the crystal comprises Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3 (page 1, col. 3, line 20-40, Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3(PIN-PMN-PT) relaxor ferroelectric crystals to boost transparency in mutually orthogonal directions through removal of undesired domain walls; We used such poled PIN-PMN-PT crystals to construct an ultracompact free-space EO Q-switch).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the light modulation of Haertling by the electro-optic modulator of Liu for the purpose of a electro-optic modulator which demonstrated its feasibility and effectiveness in miniaturization and driving voltage reduction (page 1, col. 3, line 20-40).
Regarding Claim 10, Haertling discloses as set forth above, and further teaches comprising a single crystal (fig. 1, 16, 20, 22; fig. 3, 22).
But Haertling does not specifically disclose that the component of claim 9, wherein the crystal comprises Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3.
However, Liu teaches a electro-optic modulator (abstract), wherein the crystal comprises Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3 (page 1, col. 3, line 20-40, Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3(PIN-PMN-PT) relaxor ferroelectric crystals to boost transparency in mutually orthogonal directions through removal of undesired domain walls; We used such poled PIN-PMN-PT crystals to construct an ultracompact free-space EO Q-switch).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the light modulation of Haertling by the electro-optic modulator of Liu for the purpose of a electro-optic modulator which demonstrated its feasibility and effectiveness in miniaturization and driving voltage reduction (page 1, col. 3, line 20-40).
Regarding Claim 13, Haertling - Liu combination teaches the method according to claim 1,
wherein the single crystal comprises a <100> direction and a <011> direction (fig. 1 (A), [011], [100], as disclosed in Liu),
wherein said applying the electric field to the single crystal applying a compression stress to the crystal, or applying both comprises at least one of:
applying the compression stress along the <100> direction; and
applying the electric field through the <011> direction (page 2, col. 2, line 4-10, As the electric field is applied along the [011] direction, as disclosed in Liu).
Regarding Claim 14, Haertling - Liu combination teaches the component according to claim 9,
wherein the single crystal comprises a <011> direction (fig. 1 (A), [011], as disclosed in Liu);
wherein said electrodes are situated to provide the voltage through the <011> direction (fig. 3, 40/36, 42/38, as disclosed in Haertling; page 2, col. 2, line 4-10, As the electric field is applied along the [011] direction, as disclosed in Liu).
Regarding Claim 15, Haertling - Liu combination teaches the component according to claim 9,
wherein the single crystal comprises a <100> direction (fig. 1 (A), [100], as disclosed in Liu),
wherein said compression stress source is situated to apply the stress along the <100> direction of the single crystal (fig. 1 (A), [011], [100]; page 2, col. 2, line 4-10, As the electric field is applied along the [011] direction, as disclosed in Liu; fig. 3, 22, 20, 40/36, 42/38; -- electric field is applied along the 36—38 direction, compression stress field is applied along 20—22 surface, as disclosed in Haertling).
Regarding Claim 16, Haertling - Liu combination teaches the component of claim 9, wherein the crystal comprises [011]-electrically poled Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3 (page 1, col. 3, line 20-40, Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3(PIN-PMN-PT) relaxor ferroelectric crystals to boost transparency in mutually orthogonal directions through removal of undesired domain walls; We used such poled PIN-PMN-PT crystals to construct an ultracompact free-space EO Q-switch, as disclosed in Liu).
Regarding Claim 17, Haertling - Liu combination teaches the component of claim 9, wherein the crystal comprises a doping near a morphotropic phase boundary (page 2, col. 2, line 4-21, One of the most important features of relaxor ferroelectric crystals such as PIN-PMN-PT is the ease of polarization rotation under an external electric field along the nonpolar direction, which is associated with the flattened free energy landscape near the morphotropic phase boundary and the presence of nanoscale local structure heterogeneity, as disclosed in Liu).
Regarding Claim 18, Haertling - Liu combination teaches the component of claim 17, wherein the crystal comprises xPb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 –(1-x-y) Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- yPbTiO3 (PIN-PMN-PT) with x ~ 0.24 and y ~0.30 (page 1, col. 3, line 20-40, Pb((In1/2 Nb1/2 )O3 - Pb((Mg1/3 Nb2/3)O3- PbTiO3(PIN-PMN-PT) relaxor ferroelectric crystals to boost transparency in mutually orthogonal directions through removal of undesired domain walls; We used such poled PIN-PMN-PT crystals to construct an ultracompact free-space EO Q-switch, as disclosed in Liu; ---the x, y values can be chosen as claimed, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art, In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233 (C.C.P.A. 1955)).
Allowable Subject Matter
Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for the allowable subject matter: The prior art taken singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitations of the claims, in such a manner that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 would be proper.
In regard to claim 19, the prior art taken either singly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest a method of light modulation further comprising wherein the reversible phase transformation comprises a reversible rhombohedral to orthorhombic phase transformation.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of references or any portions of references being used in the current new 103 rejections.
Examiner’s Note
Regarding the references, the Examiner cites particular figures, paragraphs, columns and line numbers in the reference(s), as applied to the claims above. Although the particular citations are representative teachings and are applied to specific limitations within the claims, other passages, internally cited references, and figures may also apply. In preparing a response, it is respectfully requested that the Applicant fully consider the references, in their entirety, as potentially disclosing or teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as fully consider the context of the passage as taught by the reference(s) or as disclosed by the Examiner.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communication from the examiner should be directed to Jie Lei whose telephone number is (571) 272 7231. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon.-Thurs. 8:00 am to 5:30 pm.
If attempts to reach the examiner by the telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached on (571) 272 2434.The Fax number for the organization where this application is assigned is (571) 273 8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published application may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Services Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199(In USA or Canada) or 571-272-1000.
/JIE LEI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Prosecution Insights