Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/380,095

ABSOLUTE LONGITUDINAL LOCALIZATION OF A MOVING OBJECT ON THE NON-LINEAR SECTIONS OF A TRAJECTORY DESCRIBED BY A CONTINUOUS CURVE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 13, 2023
Examiner
MANGIALASCHI, TRACY
Art Unit
2668
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
ORACLE INTERNATIONAL Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
455 granted / 603 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 603 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 31 July 2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 31 July 2026 was filed after the mailing date of the Notice of Allowance on 07 July 2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment Claims 3, 5, 10, 16 and 18 have been amended. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the set of differences" in lines 2-3 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is noted that claim 11 depends on claim 10, which is dependent on independent claim 1. It is also noted that “a set of differences” is recited in claim 8, which is dependent on independent claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 would be allowable if the 35 U.S.C. §112(b) rejection were overcome. Claims 1-10 and 12-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 11 would be allowable if the 35 U.S.C. §112(b) rejection were overcome and claims 1-10 and 12-20 are allowed because while the prior art discloses creating boundary ground truth maps and boundary track maps for localization of autonomous vehicles on tracks or racetracks, the prior art does not disclose the limitations “for each digital image of a plurality of digital images in video data; generating an estimated track boundary segment based on said each digital image associated with a moving object; for each position of a plurality of positions in an actual track boundary segment pertaining to a track for one or more moving objects based on said each position, making an alignment of the estimated track boundary segment with the actual track boundary segment, based on the alignment, generating a difference measurement between the estimated track boundary segment and a portion of the actual track boundary segment” as recited in the independent claims. The closest prior art being Kabzan, Juraj, et al. "AMZ Driverless: The Full Autonomous Racing System." arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05150 (2019), discloses algorithms and system architecture for an autonomous racecar. In order to autonomously race around a previously unknown track, the proposed solution combines techniques from different fields of robotics including perception, estimation and control. The perception system uses either LiDAR, vision or both. The motion estimation subsystem fuses measurements from five different sensors. For localization and mapping, a particle filter-based SLAM system is used which facilitates the detection and association of landmarks. A custom path planning algorithm is generated which takes the most likely track boundaries into account given a map and/or on-board perception. A control framework is developed that directly minimizes lap time while obeying the vehicle's traction limits and track boundary constraints. Sauerbeck, Florian, et al. "A combined LiDAR-camera localization for autonomous race cars." SAE (2021), discloses a multi-sensor localization approach developed for use in the Indy Autonomous Challenge (IAC). To decouple lateral and longitudinal position of the ego vehicle, a track bound coordinate system is used that can be transformed to conventional Cartesian coordinates. The longitudinal motion of the car is tracked via a modified version of the OpenVSLAM that outputs the progress of the already driven distance. The SAFER barrier which encloses the whole oval is detected by a 3D-LiDAR and the transformation of the barrier to the ego vehicle is estimated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACY MANGIALASCHI whose telephone number is (571)270-5189. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9:30AM TO 6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vu Le can be reached at (571) 272-7332. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACY MANGIALASCHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 31, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737917
COMBINING DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE AND FOUNDATION MODELS FOR ONE-SHOT MEDICAL IMAGE FEATURE LOCALIZATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733729
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING COSMETIC SKIN ATTRIBUTES BASED ON DISORDER VALUE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731410
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO TRACK AND CLASSIFY OBJECTS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718340
METHOD FOR DETERMINING AREAS OF LAND COMPATIBLE WITH THE INSTALLATION OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12700132
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 603 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month