Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/380,215

Threaded fastener

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 16, 2023
Examiner
WONG, JOCK M
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
34%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 34% of cases
34%
Career Allow Rate
28 granted / 83 resolved
-18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+44.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
131
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 83 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “10110” has been used to designate both plurality of annular ridges in at least Fig 2 and plurality of spiral grooves in Fig 3. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In Pg 3, line 8, “shank 11” should read “shank 111” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 1-3 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claims 1 and 3, lines 4 and 2, respectively, “the annular ridges” should read “the plurality of annular ridges” In claim 1, line 6, Examiner suggests amending “configured to dispose” to “configured to be disposed” for clarity In claim 2, line 1, “the spiral grooves” should read “the plurality of spiral grooves” In claim 2, line 2, Examiner suggests amending “each other” to “from each other” for clarity In claim 3, line 2, Examiner suggests amending “configured to threadedly secure” to “configured to be threadedly secured” for clarity Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wilcox et al. (US20220120306A1), hereinafter "Wilcox". Regarding claim 1, Wilcox teaches a fastener (Fig 1, fastener 100), comprising: a bolt (Fig 1, mandrel 112) including a head (Fig 1, portion 118) and a threaded shank (Fig 1, region 122; Paragraph 0025, Wilcox indicates shank region 122 includes a threaded portion) having a conic, bare section (see Fig 1, Examiner notes a tapered portion between portion 118 and region 122 as a conic, bare section) proximate (see Fig 1) the head (118), a threaded section (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025, Examiner notes shank region 122 includes a threaded portion as a threaded section) having a plurality of annular ridges (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025, Examiner notes threads of shank region 122 including a threaded portion as having a plurality of annular ridges) and a plurality of spiral grooves (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025, Examiner notes grooves between the threads of shank region 122 including a threaded portion as a plurality of spiral grooves) in the annular ridges (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025); and a hollow member (Fig 1, sleeve 102) including a head (Fig 1, collar 110) and a shank (Fig 1, portion 128); wherein the hollow member (102) is configured to dispose (see Fig 1) on the bolt (112) with an end (Fig 1, end 104) of the shank (128) being urged (see Fig 2C, Paragraph 0029) by the conic, bare section (see Fig 1). Regarding claim 2, Wilcox teaches the fastener (100) of claim 1 and further teaches wherein the spiral grooves (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025) are spaced apart 90-degree each other (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025, Examiner notes each turn of the threads of shank region 122 including a threaded portion being circumferentially spaced from each other as are spaced apart 90-degree each other). Regarding claim 3, Wilcox teaches the fastener (100) of claim 1 and further teaches wherein the head (110) of the hollow member (102) is internally threaded (see Fig 2C, Paragraph 0036) and configured to threadedly secure (see Fig 2C, Paragraph 0036) to the annular ridges (see Fig 1, Paragraph 0025). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOCK WONG whose telephone number is (571)270-1349. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:30am - 5:00pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at (571)272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.W./Examiner, Art Unit 3675 /KRISTINA R FULTON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584510
Torque-Limiting Nut for a Break-Off Bolt
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560193
STICK FIT FASTENER RECESS SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12535096
THREADED FASTENER FOR A FASTENING ELEMENT, FASTENING RAIL FOR AN AIRCRAFT CABIN, AND AIRCRAFT PROVIDED THEREWITH
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529394
SCREW ANCHORS FOR ANCHORING LOADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12497990
Separate screw thread helix fixed by means of claws
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
34%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+44.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 83 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month