Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/381,363

SOLAR TABLE MOBILE TRANSPORT WITH COLLAPSIBLE MANIPULATORS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Examiner
JOERGER, KAITLIN S
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Terabase Energy Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1013 granted / 1169 resolved
+34.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1198
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.9%
+19.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1169 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 3-4 and 14 in the reply filed on 2 March 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that species I and II can be examined together as they are detailed embodiments under the broader invention as defined by generic claims 1-2 and 12-13. This is not found persuasive because the applicant presented a clear mapping of the similarities of the claims directed to species I and II. Therefore, claims 1-7 and 12-17 will be examined on the merits. Claims 8-11 and 16-18 are directed to a non-elected species and will not be examined in the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 13, 15, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2023/0066547. Regarding claim 1, US ‘547 teaches a mobile transport, 210, for moving a solar table, 311, the mobile transport comprising: a transport component, 420, operable to move the solar table from a first location to a point of installation, see figure 2; and a first and a second collapsible manipulators, each collapsible manipulator comprises a base frame, 630, coupled to the transport component and a solar table holder, 450, that couples to a torque tube, 680, of the solar table, the first and the second collapsible manipulators are collapsible to raise or lower the solar table holder, see figure 6 and paragraph 0039 and 0040. Regarding claim 2, US ‘547 teaches the first and the second collapsible manipulators operate independently from each other or collaboratively, see paragraph 0039. Regarding claim 6, US ‘647 teaches each collapsible manipulator is a direct lift comprising: a lift frame, 650, having a first end pivotably coupled to the base frame, 630, the lift frame comprises a support beam, 725, placed on a second end of the lift frame and a horizontal beam, see second non-numbered horizontal beam shown in figure 7, placed between the first end and the support beam, the solar table holder is slidably attached to the support beam, 725, to support the solar table, see figures 4, 6, and 7; and a lift control element, 640, coupled between the support beam of the lift frame and an underneath beam placed underneath the base frame, the lift control element is operable to unfold the lift frame to a lifted position or folded the lift frame to a collapsed position, see figures 4, 6, and 7 and paragraphs 0039 and 0040. Regarding claim 7, US ‘647 teaches the lift control element is positioned vertically, see figures 6. Regarding claim 12, US ‘647 teaches a method for moving a solar table, the method comprising: loading the solar table on to a mobile transport at a first location, see paragraph 0026 and figure 2, the mobile transport comprises a transport component and a pair of collapsible manipulators, see paragraph 0039, 0040 and figure 6, each collapsible manipulator comprises a base frame, 630, coupled to the transport component and a solar table holder, 450, that couples to a torque tube, 680, of the solar table, the pair of collapsible manipulators are collapsible to raise or lower the solar table holder, see paragraphs 0033, 0039 and 0040; operating the pair of collapsible manipulators for a collapsed or a partially expanded position for driving stability; transporting, by the mobile transport, the solar table from the first location to a point of installation; and aligning the solar table to an installation stance, see paragraphs 0028, which teaches that alignment of the solar table, which includes lifting by the collapsible manipulators happens after transport to the installation sight. Regarding claim 13, US ‘647 teaches the pair of collapsible manipulators operates independently from each other or collaboratively, see paragraphs 0039. Regarding claim 15, U S’647 teaches each collapsible manipulator is a direct lift comprising: a lift frame, 650, having a first end pivotably coupled to the base frame, 630, the lift frame comprises a support beam, 725, placed on a second end of the lift frame and a horizontal beam, see second non-numbered horizontal beam shown in figure 7, placed between the first end and the support beam, the solar table holder is slidably attached to the support beam, 725, to support the solar table, see figures 4, 6, and 7; and a lift control element, 640, coupled between the support beam of the lift frame and an underneath beam placed underneath the base frame, the lift control element is operable to unfold the lift frame to a lifted position or folded the lift frame to a collapsed position, see figures 4, 6, and 7 and paragraphs 0039 and 0040. Regarding claim 19, US ‘647 teaches method wherein transporting, by the mobile transport, the solar table from the first location to the point of installation comprises: transporting the solar table from the first location in proximity to the point of installation, the point of installation is between two piles; lifting the solar table by unfolding the collapsible manipulators such that that solar table is able to cross the two piles from above; maneuvering the mobile transport between the two piles to the point of installation, see paragraphs 0027 and 0028. Regarding claim 20, US ‘647 teaches aligning the solar table to the installation stance comprises one or more of: raising or lowering a height of the solar table; moving the solar table horizontally; moving the solar table laterally; moving the solar table longitudinally; adjusting a pitch angle of the solar table; and adjusting a yaw angle of the solar table, see paragraph 0028. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3-5 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2023/0066547 in view US 2024/00081836 . Regarding claim 3, US ‘647 teaches: a lift frame having, 650, a first end pivotably coupled to the base frame, 630, and having a support beam, 725, placed on a second end of the lift frame, the solar table holder, 450, is attached to the support beam to support the solar table; and a lift control element, 640, the lift control element is operable to unfold the lift frame to a lifted position or folded the lift frame to a collapsed position. US ‘647 does not teach that each collapsible manipulator is a scissor lift comprising: a pivot frame having a first end pivotably coupled to the lift frame at a position between the first end and the second end of the lift frame; and a lift control element coupled between a second end of the pivot frame and the first end of the lift frame. US ‘836 teaches a mobile transport for moving a solar table, the mobile transport comprising a collapsible manipulator that is a scissor lift, 6, comprising: a lift frame having, 81, a first end pivotably coupled to the base frame, 8, and having a support beam, see beam sliding in rail 90, placed on a second end of the lift frame, the solar table holder, 150, is attached to the support beam to support the solar table; and a pivot frame, 82, having a first end pivotably coupled to the lift frame at a position between the first end and the second end of the lift frame; and a lift control element, 83, coupled between a second end of the pivot frame and the first end of the lift frame, the lift control element is operable to unfold the lift frame to a lifted position or folded the lift frame to a collapsed position. Since both US ‘647 and US ‘836 teach lift mechanisms to stably lift a solar table being transported on a mobile transport, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to replace the direct lift of US ‘647 with the scissor lift of US ‘836 in order to achieve the predictable result of stable lifting and lowering the solar table at the solar installation point. Regarding claim 4, US ‘647 further teaches the solar table holder, 450, is slidable along the support beam, 725, such that the mobile transport is able to move the solar table horizontally or adjust a yaw angle of the solar table, see paragraph 0044. Regarding claim 5, US ‘647 teaches the lift control element that is controllable for a desired motion speed and a traveling distance, see lift magnitude 617 and 622, figure 6 and paragraph 0039 and US ‘836 teaches the lift control element is a hydraulically or pneumatically operated cylinder, 83. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to control the speed and magnitude of the hydraulic lift element of US ‘836, as taught by US ‘647 in order to accurately control the movement of the solar table as it is lifted and lowered. Regarding claim 14, US ‘647 teaches method comprising: a lift frame having, 650, a first end pivotably coupled to the base frame, 630, and having a support beam, 725, placed on a second end of the lift frame, the solar table holder, 450, is attached to the support beam to support the solar table; and a lift control element, 640, the lift control element is operable to unfold the lift frame to a lifted position or folded the lift frame to a collapsed position. US ‘647 does not teach that each collapsible manipulator is a scissor lift comprising: a pivot frame having a first end pivotably coupled to the lift frame at a position between the first end and the second end of the lift frame; and a lift control element coupled between a second end of the pivot frame and the first end of the lift frame. US ‘836 teaches a mobile transport for moving a solar table, the mobile transport comprising a collapsible manipulator that is a scissor lift, 6, comprising: a lift frame having, 81, a first end pivotably coupled to the base frame, 8, and having a support beam, see beam sliding in rail 90, placed on a second end of the lift frame, the solar table holder, 150, is attached to the support beam to support the solar table; and a pivot frame, 82, having a first end pivotably coupled to the lift frame at a position between the first end and the second end of the lift frame; and a lift control element, 83, coupled between a second end of the pivot frame and the first end of the lift frame, the lift control element is operable to unfold the lift frame to a lifted position or folded the lift frame to a collapsed position. Since both US ‘647 and US ‘836 teach lift mechanisms to stably lift a solar table being transported on a mobile transport, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to replace the direct lift of US ‘647 with the scissor lift of US ‘836 in order to achieve the predictable result of stable lifting and lowering the solar table at the solar installation point. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Prior art cited on the PTO-892 are included in the file to show other examples of mobile transports with lift frames. The prior art relied upon in the rejection is considered the best prior art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAITLIN S JOERGER whose telephone number is (571)272-6938. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5 (CST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at (571)270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAITLIN S JOERGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655 9 April 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12642047
LIFT ASSEMBLY FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSING CHAMBER
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630403
REMOVABLE DEVICE LOCKABLE IN A DEDICATED LOCATION OF A MACHINE
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630402
PALLET PUSHING DEVICE FOR FORKLIFT
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631038
Vertical Circulation Three-Dimensional Garage
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623782
UAV Autoloader Systems and Methods
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.9%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1169 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month