Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/381,416

MONITORING VITAL SIGNS OF MULTIPLE PERSONS VIA SINGLE PHASED-MIMO RADAR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Priority
Oct 18, 2022 — provisional 63/417,075
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rutgers The State University Of New Jersey
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
80 granted / 112 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
183
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
83.5%
+43.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 112 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 20, 2026 has been entered. Claim 1, 9, and 17 are amended. Claims 1-20 are pending this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al (EP 3885786 A1) in view of Hassanien et al (IEEE, 2020). Regarding Claim 1, Wang method for sensing movement, comprising [0297-0298]: transmitting, at each of N transmitting antennas (TXs) of a phased multiple-input multiple-output (phased-MIMO) radar [0299 for two transmitting antennas], a common frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) signal in each of a plurality of time division multiplex (TDM) slots [0299 for FMCW TDM-MIMO radar signal to monitor heartbeat], each TDM slot having associated with it a respective weight selected in accordance with a transmit steering vector configured to cause a coherent summation of transmitted signal of all transmitting antennas in a desired direction q0 toward at least one target [0299-0300, and 0309]; receiving target-reflected energy associated with the transmitted FMCW signals at a virtual array formed by signal from P TDM slots received via M receiving antennas (RXs) of the phased-MIMO radar [0273 for using Tx and Rx virtual array, and 0299-0301 for four receiving antennas]; and processing an output of the virtual array to extract therefrom signal received from the desired direction q0 to determine thereby target movement in the desired direction q0 [0300 for determining distance and angle (direction) and 0303-0305 for determining direction based on threshold values and determining random body motion, 0325 and figure 23]. Wang fails to explicitly teach stacking a signal and the FMCW signal phase shifted at each respective transmitting antenna via transmission of a plurality of time division multiplex slots. Hassanien has a technique for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar with co-located antennas (abstract) and teaches using stacking a signal [page 3140, left column, eq (17) and last two paragraphs match filtering and stacking into a virtual array] and the FMCW signal phase shifted at each respective transmitting antenna via transmission of a plurality of time division multiplex slots [page 3139, right column first two paragraphs for all antennas of the kth sub array coherently emits signal in a certain direction]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the vital sensing techniques, as disclosed by Wang, further including the signal stack calculations as taught by Hassanien for the purpose to maximize the coherent processing gain (Hassanien, page 3139, right column, first paragraph). Regarding Claim 9, Wang teaches a vital sign sensing system, comprising [0297]: a phased multiple-input multiple-output (phased-MIMO) radar configured for transmitting [0299], at each of N transmitting antennas (TXs), a common frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) signal in each of a plurality of time division multiplex (TDM) slots [0299 for FMCW TDM-MIMO radar signal to monitor heartbeat with two transmitting antennas], each TDM slot of each transmitting antennas having associated with it a respective weight selected in accordance with a transmit steering vector configured to cause a coherent summation of transmitted signal of all transmitting antennas in a desired direction q0 toward at least one target [0299-0300, and 0309]; the phased-MIMO radar configured for receiving, at a virtual array formed by a signal from P TDM slots received via M receiving antennas (RXs), target-reflected energy associated with the transmitted FMCW signals [0273 for using Tx and Rx virtual array, and 0299-0301]; and processing an output of the virtual array to extract therefrom signal received from the desired direction q 0 to determine thereby target movement in the desired direction q0 [0300 for determining distance and angle (direction) and 0303-0305 for determining direction based on threshold values]. Wang fails to explicitly teach stacking a signal and the FMCW signal phase shifted at each respective transmitting antenna via transmission of a plurality of time division multiplex slots. Hassanien has a technique for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar with co-located antennas (abstract) and teaches using stacking a signal [page 3140, left column, eq (17) and last two paragraphs match filtering and stacking into a virtual array] and the FMCW signal phase shifted at each respective transmitting antenna via transmission of a plurality of time division multiplex slots [page 3139, right column first two paragraphs for all antennas of the kth sub array coherently emits signal in a certain direction]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the vital sensing techniques, as disclosed by Wang, further including the signal stack calculations as taught by Hassanien for the purpose to maximize the coherent processing gain (Hassanien, page 3139, right column, first paragraph). Regarding Claim 17, Wang teaches a motion sensing system, comprising [0297]: a phased multiple-input multiple-output (phased-MIMO) radar configured for transmitting, at each of N transmitting antennas (TXs) [0299 for two transmit antennas in a MIMO configuration], a common frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) signal in each of a plurality of time division multiplex (TDM) slots [0299 for FMCW TDM-MIMO radar signal to monitor heartbeat], each TDM slot of each transmitting antennas having associated with it a respective weight selected in accordance with a transmit steering vector configured to cause a coherent summation of transmitted signal of all transmitting antennas in a desired direction PNG media_image1.png 17 16 media_image1.png Greyscale toward at least one target [0299-0300, and 0309]; the phased-MIMO radar configured for receiving, at a virtual array formed by a signal from P TDM slots received via M receiving antennas (RXs), target-reflected energy associated with the transmitted FMCW signals [0273 for using Tx and Rx virtual array, and 0299-0301]; and processing an output of the virtual array to extract therefrom signal received from the desired direction q0 to determine thereby target movement in the desired direction q0 [0300 for determining distance and angle (direction) and 0303-0305 for determining direction based on threshold values]. Wang fails to explicitly teach stacking a signal and the FMCW signal phase shifted at each respective transmitting antenna via transmission of a plurality of time division multiplex slots. Hassanien has a technique for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar with co-located antennas (abstract) and teaches using stacking a signal [page 3140, left column, eq (17) and last two paragraphs match filtering and stacking into a virtual array] and the FMCW signal phase shifted at each respective transmitting antenna via transmission of a plurality of time division multiplex slots [page 3139, right column first two paragraphs for all antennas of the kth sub array coherently emits signal in a certain direction]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the vital sensing techniques, as disclosed by Wang, further including the signal stack calculations as taught by Hassanien for the purpose to maximize the coherent processing gain (Hassanien, page 3139, right column, first paragraph). Regarding Claim 2, 10, and 18, Wang teaches the desired direction q0 comprises the angle of human subjects with respect to the radar and is determined using a Capon Beamformer (CB) angle estimation method [0223]. Regarding Claim 3, 11, and 19, Wang teaches each of a plurality of frames are transmitted in sequence toward each of the at least one targets, each transmitted frame comprising a transmitted FMCW signal in each of the plurality of time slots [0299-0300, 0306]. Regarding Claim 4, 12, and 20, Wang teaches the transmitted FMCW signal is of the form [0299 for MIMO array from FMCW signals]: x(t) = PNG media_image2.png 37 172 media_image2.png Greyscale where At is amplitude, fc is chirp starting frequency, b is chirp bandwidth, Tc is chirp duration, and f(t) is phase noise from transmitter [0271 for calculating frequency modulated chirp and A2-A3]. Regarding Claim 5 and 13, Wang teaches each m-th RX of the M RXs receives reflected FMCW signal from each n-th TX of the N TXs of the form [0299 for MIMO array from FMCW signals]: y(n,m,t) =Anm PNG media_image3.png 16 144 media_image3.png Greyscale where Anm is the complex amplitude of the signal transmitted by the n-th transmit antenna and received by the m-th receive antennas, fb PNG media_image4.png 33 61 media_image4.png Greyscale is the beat frequency, PNG media_image5.png 17 20 media_image5.png Greyscale (t,n,m) = PNG media_image6.png 35 135 media_image6.png Greyscale -(dm PNG media_image7.png 30 90 media_image7.png Greyscale , R(t) is the radial range of the target [0272 and A4-A5]. Regarding Claim 6 and 14, Wang fails to explicitly teach the phased-MIMO radar transmits via a uniform linear array (ULA) of N transmitting antennas (TXs) spaced by dt, and receives via a ULA with M receiving antennas (RXs) spaced by dr. Santra has a method of monitoring a structural object includes performing a first set of radar measurements using a first millimeter-wave radar sensor(abstract) and teaches the phased-MIMO radar transmits via a uniform linear array (ULA) of N transmitting antennas (TXs) spaced by dt, and receives via a ULA with M receiving antennas (RXs) spaced by dr [0042-0044]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the vital sensing techniques, as disclosed by Wang, further including the signal stack calculations as taught by Santra for the purpose to generate the azimuth imaging profile (Santra, 0070). Regarding Claim 7 and 15, Wang teaches for each of the transmitting slot a corresponding weight wp(q) is calculated as: wp PNG media_image8.png 21 167 media_image8.png Greyscale wp where a (q)=dt sin (q)/l is a transmit wavelength, and at(q) is a transmit steering vector [0278 for calculating the steering vector angle]. Regarding Claim 8 and 16, Wang teaches a target movement in the desired direction q0 comprises at least one of a heart rate (HR) and a breathing rate (BR) associated with a human target [0299-0300]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. On page 8, third paragraph, the applicant argues that Wang fails to teach the analog transmit beamforming in the present claims and the single RF chain. The examiner respectfully disagrees: The applicant only claims respective weight selected in accordance with a transmit steering vector configured to cause a coherent summation of transmitted signal, not these exact features. However, Wang still discloses time-division multiplexing (TDM) mode by transmitting sequentially through two Tx antennas [Wang, figure 16, 0273] and using a Bartlett beamformer with steering vectors [Wang, 0278]. On page 9, first paragraph, the applicant argues that Wang fails to teach each analog beamforming. The examiner respectfully disagrees: neither analog now digital beamforming is recited in the claims. However, Wang teaches digital beamforming with beamforming is performed at operation 1420, e.g. by a Bartlett beamformer, to get the channel information at different azimuth-range bins [Wang, 0269] and analog beamforming using steering vectors with the receiver [Wang, 0279]. Furthermore, new reference Hassanien teaches applying identical steering vectors [Hassanien, page 3441, right column, first two paragraph and equation (24)]. On page 9, last paragraph, the applicant argues that Wang dos not disclose the TDM slot having associated with a respective weight. The examiner respectfully disagrees: Wang computes steering vector weights per receive channel per virtual array element, where each virtual array element corresponds to a specific TDM slot/Rx pair [Wang, 0269, 0273, 0278 cited above]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMARINA MAKHDOOM whose telephone number is (703)756-1044. The examiner can normally be reached Monday – Thursdays from 8:30 to 5:30 pm eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kelleher can be reached on 571-272-7753 The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMARINA MAKHDOOM/ Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592157
AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS
4y 4m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584995
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING RADAR SIGNAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578449
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION RELATED TO EXTERNAL OBJECT
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566245
AUTONOMOUS RADAR SENSOR WHICH TAKES MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552407
CODE-TIME BLOCK MIMO MODULATION FOR DIGITAL MODULAR RADAR
2y 10m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.1%)
3y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 112 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month