Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/382,119

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Priority
Apr 30, 2021 — continuation of PCTCN2021091647
Examiner
YOUNG, STEVE R
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
1FINITY Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
394 granted / 586 resolved
+9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
618
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
92.6%
+52.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 586 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II (Claims 13-19) in the reply filed on 05/22/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-12, and 20, are withdrawn from consideration. Claims 13-19 remain pending. Applicant is reminded that upon the cancelation of claims to a non-elected invention, the inventorship must be corrected in compliance with 37 CFR 1.48(a) if one or more of the currently named inventors is no longer an inventor of at least one claim remaining in the application. A request to correct inventorship under 37 CFR 1.48(a) must be accompanied by an application data sheet in accordance with 37 CFR 1.76 that identifies each inventor by his or her legal name and by the processing fee required under 37 CFR 1.17(i). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 13-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by NPL “Enhancements on Multi-TRP for PDCCH, PUCCH and PUSCH” (hereinafter referred to as Qualcomm). RE Claim 13, Qualcomm discloses a wireless communication apparatus, wherein the apparatus comprises: a receiver configured to receive downlink control information, the downlink control information being used to trigger PUCCH transmission (See Qualcomm Section 3; pgs. 14-15 – DCI indicating PUCCH resource), and the downlink control information comprising a first TPC indicator and a second TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pgs. 14-15 – DCI can be used to control the two TPC commands of the two closed loop index values separately when needed, and the downlink control information comprising a first TPC indicator and a second TPC indicator); and a processor configured to, according to the number of closed-loop power control parameter indices to which the PUCCH transmission corresponds (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: For TPC command in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, if the “closedLoopIndex” values associated with the two PUCCH spatial relation info’s are different for multi-TRP PUCCH transmission schemes, support: Option 4: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits), and indicates two TPC values applied to two PUCCH beams, respectively (first preference). Support a mapping between TPC field and a pair of TPC commands. Option 1: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, and the TPC value applied for both PUCCH beams (second preference)), determine whether a closed-loop power control parameter of the PUCCH transmission is determined according to one of the first TPC indicator and the second TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: For TPC command in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, if the “closedLoopIndex” values associated with the two PUCCH spatial relation info’s are different for multi-TRP PUCCH transmission schemes, support: Option 4: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits), and indicates two TPC values applied to two PUCCH beams, respectively (first preference). Support a mapping between TPC field and a pair of TPC commands), or is determined according to the first TPC indicator and the second TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: For TPC command in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, if the “closedLoopIndex” values associated with the two PUCCH spatial relation info’s are different for multi-TRP PUCCH transmission schemes, support: Option 1: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, and the TPC value applied for both PUCCH beams (second preference)). RE Claim 14, Qualcomm discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 13 above, wherein, the PUCCH transmission is scheduled by a downlink control information corresponding to DCI format 1_1 or DCI format 1_2 (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits)), and the PUCCH transmission is associated with one or two closed-loop power control parameter indices (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: PUCCH associated with one or two closed loop power control TPC indices). RE Claim 15, Qualcomm discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 13 above, wherein, if the number of closed-loop power control parameter indices associated with the PUCCH transmission is 1, the processor determines the closed-loop power control parameter used for transmitting the PUCCH transmission according to one of the first TPC indicator and the second TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: For TPC command in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, if the “closedLoopIndex” values associated with the two PUCCH spatial relation info’s are different for multi-TRP PUCCH transmission schemes, support: Option 4: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits)), and indicates two TPC values applied to two PUCCH beams, respectively (each PUCCH is associated with 1 bit TPC)). RE Claim 16, Qualcomm discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 15 above, wherein, wherein, if the closed-loop power control parameter index to which the PUCCH transmission corresponds is 0, the processor determines the closed-loop power control parameter used for transmitting the PUCCH transmission according to the first TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Option 4: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits)), and indicates two TPC values applied to two PUCCH beams, respectively (each PUCCH is associated with 1 bit TPC) – index ‘0’ is the first bit and would apply to first TPC value), if the closed-loop power control parameter index to which the PUCCH transmission corresponds is 1, the processor determines the closed-loop power control parameter used for transmitting the PUCCH transmission according to the second TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Option 4: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits)), and indicates two TPC values applied to two PUCCH beams, respectively (each PUCCH is associated with 1 bit TPC) – index ‘1’ is the second bit and would apply to second TPC value). RE Claim 17, Qualcomm discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 15 above, wherein, the processor ignores the DCI field to which one of the first TPC indicator and the second TPC indicator which is not used for determining the closed-loop power control parameter used for transmitting the PUCCH transmission corresponds (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Option 4: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2 (2 bits)), and indicates two TPC values applied to two PUCCH beams, respectively (each PUCCH is associated with 1 bit TPC) – PUCCH uses “respective” TPC value (i.e. ignores the other TPC value)). RE Claim 18, Qualcomm discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 13 above, wherein, if the number of closed-loop power control parameter indices associated with the PUCCH transmission is 2, the processor determines the closed-loop power control parameter used for transmitting the PUCCH transmission according to the first TPC indicator and the second TPC indicator (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: For TPC command in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, if the “closedLoopIndex” values associated with the two PUCCH spatial relation info’s are different for multi-TRP PUCCH transmission schemes, support: Option 1: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, and the TPC value applied for both PUCCH beams (second preference) – entire TCP field is used (i.e. 2 bits, both first and second TPC values (bits)) to determine closed-loop power control parameter). RE Claim 19, Qualcomm discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 18 above, wherein, the closed-loop power control parameter index to which the first TPC indicator corresponds is 0; the closed-loop power control parameter index to which the second TPC indicator corresponds is 1 (See Qualcomm Section 3; pg. 15 – Proposal 18: For TPC command in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, if the “closedLoopIndex” values associated with the two PUCCH spatial relation info’s are different for multi-TRP PUCCH transmission schemes, support: Option 1: A single TPC field is used in DCI formats 1_1/1_2, and the TPC value applied for both PUCCH beams (second preference) – entire TCP field is used (i.e. 2 bits, both first and second TPC values (bits)) to determine closed-loop power control parameter; first TPC index (bit) is ‘0’ and second TPC index (bit) is ‘1’). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steve R Young whose telephone number is (571)270-7518. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G Shah can be reached at (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE R YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672128
COMMUNICATION OF ASYNCHRONOUS ULTRA-LOW LATENCY TRANSMISSIONS WITHIN A SYNCHRONIZED TRANSMISSION OPPORTUNITY (S-TXOP)
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666459
TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659959
UPLINK TRANSMISSION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND TERMINAL
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660022
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROVIDING DUAL CONNECTIVITY AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647967
EARLY UE PANEL SWITCH REPORTING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+19.7%)
3y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 586 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month