Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/382,133

MOBILE CNC SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Examiner
SALONE, BAYAN
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Martino Family Holdings
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
626 granted / 822 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 822 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claim 20 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on April 09, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 8-15, 18 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ulmer et al. (US 2017/0129059 A1), in view of 進藤 茂實 et al. (JP 3176399, herein referenced by the EPO English Machine translation). Re Claim 1, Ulmer discloses a mobile computer numerical control (CNC) system 10, comprising: a motor vehicle (not shown) (Par. 0077) that includes: a first container 12 defining an enclosed compartment (See figures 1A-3); a CNC machine 12 mounted on the motor vehicle and positioned inside the enclosed compartment 14 (Pars. 0008, 0062 and 0077, Figs. 1A-4, 7 and 8); a battery 110 that is constructed and arranged to provide power to at least the CNC machine 12 (Pars. 0016, 0032, and 0069, Fig. 4). Ulmer does not explicitly disclose a power inverter that is in electrical communication with the battery and the CNC machine, the power inverter is constructed and arranged to convert a direct current (DC) from the battery to an alternating current (AC), and the power inverter is further constructed and arranged to provide at least the CNC machine with the AC current. 進藤 茂實 discloses a computer numerical control (CNC) system, comprising: a CNC machine 20; a battery B that is constructed and arranged to provide power to at least the CNC machine 20; and a power inverter that is in electrical communication with the battery and the CNC machine 20, the power inverter I is constructed and arranged to convert a direct current (DC) from the battery B to an alternating current (AC), and the power inverter I is further constructed and arranged to provide at least the CNC machine with the AC current (Pars. 0024-0028, Figs. 1-9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the invention of Ulmer with a power inverter that is in electrical communication with the battery and the CNC machine, as disclosed by 進藤 茂實, thus supplying AC current to the CNC machine, as a known means of supplying electrical power to a CNC system. Re Claim 11, Ulmer discloses a mobile computer numerical control (CNC) system 10, comprising: a motor vehicle (not shown) (Par. 0077)that includes: a first container 12 defining an enclosed compartment; a CNC machine 14 mounted on the motor vehicle and positioned inside the enclosed compartment (Pars. 0008 and 0062, Figs. 1A-4, 7 and 8); a battery 110 that is constructed and arranged to provide power to at least the CNC machine 14 (Pars. 0016, 0032, and 0069, Fig. 4). Ulmer does not explicitly disclose a power inverter that is in electrical communication with the battery and the CNC machine. 進藤 茂實 discloses a computer numerical control (CNC) system, comprising: a CNC machine 20; a battery B that is constructed and arranged to provide power to at least the CNC machine 20; and a power inverter that is in electrical communication with the battery and the CNC machine 20 (Pars. 0024-0028, Figs. 1-9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the invention of Ulmer with a power inverter that is in electrical communication with the battery and the CNC machine, as disclosed by 進藤 茂實, as a known means of supplying electrical power to a CNC system. Re Claims 2 and 12, the combination as applied to claims 1 and 11 remains as previously applied. The combination does not explicitly disclose the CNC machine is a CNC router. Ulmer does however disclose it is conventional in the art to use a CNC router (Par. 0004). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide a CNC machine that is a CNC router, as is conventionally known in the art. Re Claims 3 and 13, the combination as applied to claims 1 and 11 remains as previously applied. Ulmer discloses a dust collector 50 constructed and arranged to remove dust and debris from the CNC machine 14 (Pars. 0007-0009, 0062 and 0065, Fig. 3). Re Claims 4 and 14, the combination as applied to claims 1 and 11 remains as previously applied. Ulmer discloses the CNC machine 14 is constructed and arranged to cut plastics, elastomers, thermoplastic elastomers, or a combination thereof (Par. 0071). Note: Ulmer discloses that characteristics of various pipe to be machined are input into the system. The Examiner construes this to meet the claim limitation as an operator is capable of inputting the specific type of material of the pipe. Re Claims 5 and 15, the combination as applied to claims 1 and 11 remains as previously applied. Ulmer discloses the first container 12 includes a door 17 that is constructed and arranged to fluidly seal the enclosed compartment (Par. 0062, Fig. 1B). Re Claims 8 and 18, the combination as applied to claim 1 remains as previously applied. Ulmer discloses the CNC machine 14 is constructed and arranged to cut ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polyethylene (PE) closed cell foam, or a combination thereof (Par. 0071). Note: Ulmer discloses that characteristics of various pipe to be machined are input into the system. The Examiner construes this to meet the claim limitation as an operator is capable of inputting the specific type of material of the pipe. Re Claim 9, the combination as applied to claim 1 remains as previously applied. Ulmer discloses the CNC machine is constructed and arranged to cut ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), neoprene, chloroprene rubber (CR), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), nitrile rubber (NRB), or any combination thereof (Par. 0071). Note: Ulmer discloses that characteristics of various pipe to be machined are input into the system. The Examiner construes this to meet the claim limitation as an operator is capable of inputting the specific type of material of the pipe. Re Claims 10 and 19, the combination as applied to claims 1 and 11 remains as previously applied. Ulmer discloses the first container of the motor vehicle includes a roof positioned over at least the CNC machine 14 (Par. 0062, Figs. 1A and 1B). Claim(s) 6, 7, 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ulmer et al. (US 2017/0129059 A1), in view of 進藤 茂實 et al. (JP 3176399), as applied to claims 1 and 11, in view of SBARUFATTI et al. (WO 2023067538). Re Claims 6 and 16, the combination as applied to claims 1 and 11 remains as previously applied. The combination does not explicitly disclose one or more mechanical isolators mounted on the motor vehicle, wherein the CNC machine is mounted on the one or more mechanical isolators. SBARUFATTI discloses it is conventionally known to support CNC machines with mechanical isolators and a CNC machine 2 that is mounted on one or more mechanical isolators 1, to reduce vibrations to the CNC machine 2 (Page 1, Lines 10-13 and Page 7, Lines 7-18, Figs. 1 and 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the mechanical isolators of SBARUFATTI with the invention of Ulmer, to reduce vibrations to the CNC machine. Re Claims 7 and 17, the combination as applied to claims 6 and 16 remains as previously applied. The combination discloses the one or more mechanical isolators 1 are made primarily of one or more elastomers 30 (See SBARUFATTI, Page 7, Lines 7-18, Figs. 1 and 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAYAN SALONE whose telephone number is (571)270-7739. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-60 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Bryant can be reached at (571)272-4526. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAYAN SALONE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 07, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747713
MULTI-PART PISTON CONSTRUCTION FOR AN OPPOSED-PISTON ENGINE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746021
EXTRACTOR CANNULA SECUREMENT AND PROCESSING
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746607
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORMING OIL MIST IN MACHINING APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734629
TOOL CHANGING DEVICE FOR A MACHINE TOOL AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734625
SELF-POWERED SENSING TOOL HOLDER
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month