Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/383,136

TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 24, 2023
Priority
Nov 11, 2022 — JP 2022-181070
Examiner
ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
295 granted / 432 resolved
At TC average
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
461
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 432 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “first and second temperature measurement sections provided for each of a plurality of small regions into which a large region where a normal temperature range is predetermined is divided in a measurement target and configured to measure a temperature within the small region”. However it is not clear what this limitation means. The claims seems to imply that each small region has a large region that is divided, which does not make sense. Furthermore it is not clear what divided in a measurement target means. Similarly Claim 10 recites “a first temperature measurement step of measuring a temperature of a small region for each of a plurality of small regions into which a large region where a normal temperature range is predetermined is divided in a measurement target in a first temperature measurement section;”. However it is not clear what this means and is therefore indefinite. Claims 1-5, 8-14, 16, 18-19 recite “small region”. The term "small" is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "small" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 1, 6, 10, 15, 16, recite “large region”. The term "large" is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "small" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 1, 8, 10, 18 recite “normal temperature range”. The term "normal" is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "small" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 1 recites “change rate calculation sections provided for each of the plurality of small regions and configured to obtain a first temperature change rate, which is a change rate per unit time in the first measured temperature” This seems to imply that the change rate calculation sections merely obtains a first temperature change rate. However such an obtained change rate is claimed to be the change rate per unit time in the first measured temperature. It is not clear how obtaining data can cause measured data to be a particular rate and is therefore indefinite. Claim 1 recites first and second temperature measurement sections provided for each of a plurality of small regions a temperature deviation calculation section provided for each of the plurality of small regions a deviation abnormality determination section provided for each of the plurality of small regions change rate calculation sections provided for each of the plurality of small regions representative change rate calculation sections configured to obtain a representative change rate, which is a value representative of the temperature change rate for each of the plurality of small regions change rate abnormality determination sections provided for each of the plurality of small regions However the claims recite “section/sections provided for each of a plurality of small regions.” It is not clear how section and sections are related to each of the plurality of small regions. Does each small region have its own section or sections? Claims 7, 17 recites “short-time”, “long-time”. The terms “short”,"long" are relative terms which renders the claim indefinite. The terms ”short”, "long" are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Prior art could not be applied to the claims due to the 35 U.S.C. §112(b) Rejections above. Examiner recommends Applicant to schedule an interview to discuss the claimed invention, and claim language, to help Examiner better understand the intended meaning of the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tanaka (US 2008/0276595 A1) teaches a gas turbine protection apparatus, which can output a gas turbine protection signal only when a combustor is abnormal, without increasing the number of temperature sensors such as thermocouples Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOSHIHISA ISHIZUKA whose telephone number is (571)270-7050. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11:00-7:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Catherine Rastovski can be reached at (571) 270-0349. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YOSHIHISA . ISHIZUKA Examiner Art Unit 2857 /YOSHIHISA ISHIZUKA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682986
PROPERTY PREDICTION SYSTEM, PROPERTY PREDICTION METHOD, AND PROPERTY PREDICTION PROGRAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674721
IMPROVED OPERATING METHOD FOR TRANSMISSIONS
5y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676212
Scaffold Contrained Molecular Generation Using Memory Networks
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674903
SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING USING A DOWN-GOING ANNIHILATION OPERATOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670779
DATA LOGGING DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+20.0%)
3y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 432 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month