Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/383,379

SILICON CARBIDE DIRECT SILICON SURFACE POLISH

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 24, 2023
Priority
Oct 25, 2022 — provisional 63/419,158
Examiner
EWALD, MARIA VERONICA
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Entegris Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
180 granted / 307 resolved
-6.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
325
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
81.3%
+41.3% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 307 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aghajanian (US 8128861) (2012) hereafter (Agh). Regarding claims 1 and 13, Agh teaches infiltrating a ground ceramic body with molten silicon. The ceramic comprising silicon carbide and graphite or free carbon powder (see background reference to Popper (U.S. Pat. No. 3,275,722)). The surface is then polished as claimed (See claims, figures description Examples). Regarding claims 6 and 20, Agh teaches removing excess silicon infiltrates (by extrusion) to avoid beads of silicon forming on the surface (see column 26 to 27). . Regarding claim 12, and claims to the ground ceramic being less than 4 thousandths of an inch one of ordinary skill would understand that the desire to create adequate surface areas for bonding and infiltrating was the reason for grinding the ceramic in the first place. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the relevant time of filing to provide adequate bonding between the metal and carbon to form carbides. Regarding claim 14, Agh further teaches that carburizable resin may be added (see Taylor reference within Agh and column 28). Agh does not teach the level of polishing or porosity but does teach forming an initial porous body before infiltrating with silicon and polishing. Regarding claims 2-5, 7-11, and 15-18 and 20, given substantially the same process with substantially the same composition one of ordinary skill would expect the same results or; alternatively, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the relevant time of filing to provide the level of polishing, and or porosity as there appears no technical limitation to provide the claimed polishing or porosity and the art recognizes providing as final porosity and polished surface and the level of polished would be obvious to provide dependent upon desired need and application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL H MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-1534. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL H MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601093
NONWOVEN FABRIC; POUCHED PRODUCT AND RELATED METHODS
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12565452
Z-DIRECTION REINFORCED COMPOSITES AND METHODS OF FORMING Z-DIRECTION REINFORCED COMPOSITES
3y 10m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12551889
MODIFICATION OF SURFACE PROPERTIES OF MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES
2y 6m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12442591
VACUUM INSULATION PANEL, APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING VACUUM INSULATION PANEL, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING VACUUM INSULATION PANEL
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Patent 12409634
VACUUM INSULATED PANEL WITH SEAL FOR PUMP-OUT TUBE AND/OR METHOD OF MAKING SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+6.8%)
3y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 307 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month