Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/383,656

APPARATUS FOR TRANSFERRING CARRIERS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Priority
Mar 28, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0040170
Examiner
MCCLAIN, GERALD
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
587 granted / 791 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
824
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 791 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10 June 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 1-3, 8-11, and 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KO MYUNG SU (KR 20070102221 A) (“Ko”) in view of Dan et al. (US 2021/0339393) (“Dan”). Ko discloses: PNG media_image1.png 938 764 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 1: an elevator (29) configured to elevate a vehicle (vehicle holding 21 in figure 2) containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers (plurality over time) to position the vehicle at each of a plurality of process floors (C/D); a plurality of storages (47X/UX/RX), wherein at least one of the plurality of storages is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, and each of the plurality of storages is configured to store at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers; a plurality of first robots (27X), wherein at least one of the plurality of first robots is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, and each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle between the elevator and a respective one of the plurality of process floors (figure 2); and a plurality of second robots (47X and/or 53 and/or 55), wherein at least one of the plurality of second robots is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, and each of the plurality of second robots is configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 2: wherein the plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded into the vehicle in at least one of a horizontal direction or a vertical direction (figure 2); Claim 3: wherein each of the plurality of storages comprises a plurality of shelves configured to store the plurality of semiconductor device carriers in at least one of the horizontal direction or the vertical direction (figure 2); Claim 8: wherein a first one of the plurality of second robots is provided at a first side of one of the plurality of first robots, wherein a second one of the plurality of second robots is provided at a second side of the one of the plurality of first robots, and wherein a pair of storages of the plurality of storages are adjacent to the first one of the plurality of second robots and the second one of the plurality of second robots (figure 2; at 47a/47b and/or at 47c/47d); Claim 9: a controller configured to control operations of the elevator, the plurality of storages, the plurality of first robots and the plurality of second robots (“A controller with a built-in program to control the flow is installed, and its operation is controlled by the controller.” (English translation)); Claim 10: an elevator (29) configured to elevate a vehicle (vehicle holding 21 in figure 2) containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers (plurality over time) to position the vehicle at each of a plurality of process floors (C/D); a plurality of storages (47X/UX/RX), wherein at least one of the plurality of storages is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, and each of the plurality of storages comprises a plurality of shelves configured to store the plurality of semiconductor device carriers; a plurality of first robots (27X), wherein at least one of the plurality of first robots is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, and each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle between the elevator and a respective one of the plurality of process floors; a plurality of second robots (47X and/or 53 and/or 55), wherein a pair of second robots of the plurality of second robots is provided at each of the plurality of process floors (figure 2), a first one of the pair of second robots is provided at a first side of one of the plurality of first robots, a second one of the pair of second robots is provided at a second side of the one of the plurality of first robots, and each of the plurality of second robots is configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages (figure 2); and a controller configured to control operations of the elevator, the plurality of storages, the plurality of first robots, and the plurality of second robots (“A controller with a built-in program to control the flow is installed, and its operation is controlled by the controller.” (English translation)); Claim 11: wherein the plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded into the vehicle in at least one of a horizontal direction or a vertical direction, and wherein the plurality of shelves are configured to store the plurality of semiconductor device carriers in at least one of the horizontal direction or the vertical direction (figure 2); Claim 17: a pair of storages of the plurality of storages provided adjacent to one of the plurality of second robots (figure 2; at 47a/47b and/or at 47c/47d); Claim 18: an elevator (29) configured to elevate a vehicle (vehicle holding 21 in figure 2), into which a plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded (plurality over time), in a horizontal direction and a vertical direction to position the vehicle at each of a plurality of process floors (C/D); a plurality of storages (47X/UX/RX), wherein a pair of storages of the plurality of storages is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, each of the pair of storages comprises a plurality of shelves configured to store semiconductor device carriers of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers in the horizontal direction and the vertical direction; a plurality of first robots (27X), wherein at least one of the plurality of first robots is provided at each of the plurality of process floors, and each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle between the elevator and a respective one of the plurality of process floors; a plurality of second robots (47X and/or 53 and/or 55), wherein a pair of second robots the plurality of second robots is provided at each of the plurality of process floors between one of the plurality of first robots and one of the plurality of storages (figure 2), and each of the plurality of second robots is configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages (figure 2); and a controller configured to control operations of the elevator, the plurality of storages, the plurality of first robots and the plurality of second robots (“A controller with a built-in program to control the flow is installed, and its operation is controlled by the controller.” (English translation)). Ko does not directly show: Claim 1: a vehicle containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle containing the plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; Claim 10: a vehicle containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle containing the plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; Claim 18: a vehicle, into which a plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded at a time; wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle into which the plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded at a time. Dan shows a similar device having: Claim 1: a vehicle containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time (FIG. 4 shows plurality of semiconductor device carriers 400 within 200 such that plurality of semiconductor device carriers 400 are loaded/carried/etc. at a time); wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (foup box); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle containing the plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time (FIG. 21); Claim 10: a vehicle containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time (FIG. 4 shows plurality of semiconductor device carriers 400 within 200 such that plurality of semiconductor device carriers 400 are loaded/carried/etc. at a time); wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (foup box); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle containing the plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time (FIG. 21); Claim 18: a vehicle, into which a plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded at a time (FIG. 4 shows plurality of semiconductor device carriers 400 within 200 such that plurality of semiconductor device carriers 400 are loaded/carried/etc. at a time); wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (foup box); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle into which the plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded at a time (FIG. 21); with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of effectively improving the Takt time and working efficiency (para. [0006]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ko as taught by Dan and include Dan’s similar device having: Claim 1: a vehicle containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle containing the plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; Claim 10: a vehicle containing a plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle containing the plurality of semiconductor device carriers at a time; Claim 18: a vehicle, into which a plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded at a time; wherein each of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers comprises a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP); each of the plurality of first robots is configured to transfer the vehicle into which the plurality of semiconductor device carriers are loaded at a time; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of effectively improving the Takt time and working efficiency. Claim(s) 4, 12, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ko in view of Dan and Dan et al. (CN 108406730 A) (“Dan”). Ko discloses all the limitations of the claims as discussed above. Ko does not directly show: Claims 4, 12, and 19: wherein each of the plurality of first robots comprises a sensor configured to detect a bottom surface of the elevator. Dan shows a similar device having: Claims 4, 12, and 19: wherein each of the plurality of first robots comprises a sensor configured to detect a bottom surface of the elevator (Dan suggests sensor 7 detects the robot bottom at 8); with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of helping the robot carry the carrier better such that the carrier is not damaged (“The robot for transporting has the advantage of preventing the article from being detached from the middle of the side arm and carrying the article better when the object is transported, and the use of the omnidirectional wheel allows the robot for transporting to travel and rotate at an arbitrary angle, and the article is convenient.” (English translation)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ko and Dan as taught by Dan and include Dan’s similar device having: Claims 4, 12, and 19: wherein each of the plurality of first robots comprises a sensor configured to detect a bottom surface of the elevator; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of helping the robot carry the carrier better such that the carrier is not damaged. Claim(s) 5-7, 13-16, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ko in view of Dan and Kim et al. (KR 101331368 B1) (“Kim”). Ko discloses all the limitations of the claims as discussed above. Ko does not directly show: Claim 5: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and at least one fork connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 6: wherein the transfer shaft comprises a plurality of shafts provided in a horizontal direction Claim 7: wherein the at least one fork comprises a plurality of forks separated by a gap in a vertical direction.; Claim 13: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and a plurality of forks connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 14: wherein the transfer shaft comprises a plurality of shafts provided in a horizontal direction; Claim 15: wherein the controller is configured to independently control operations of the transfer shafts; Claim 16: wherein the plurality of forks are separated by a gap in a vertical direction; Claim 20: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and a plurality of forks connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages. Kim shows a similar device having: Claim 5: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and at least one fork connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 6: wherein the transfer shaft comprises a plurality of shafts provided in a horizontal direction Claim 7: wherein the at least one fork comprises a plurality of forks separated by a gap in a vertical direction.; Claim 13: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and a plurality of forks connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 14: wherein the transfer shaft comprises a plurality of shafts provided in a horizontal direction; Claim 15: wherein the controller is configured to independently control operations of the transfer shafts; Claim 16: wherein the plurality of forks are separated by a gap in a vertical direction; Claim 20: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and a plurality of forks connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; (For claims above: figure 1; “The robot arm includes a plurality of forks(101), a plurality of arm members(102,103), and a plurality of robot arm shafts(111,112,113).” (English translation); the meandering correction implies independent control of transfer shafts 111-113) with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of providing a robot with a meandering correcting function and a meandering correcting method are provided to improve productivity by enhancing the linear performance of a robot (“PURPOSE: A substrate transferring robot with a meandering correcting function and a meandering correcting method are provided to improve productivity by enhancing the linear performance of a robot arm.” (English translation)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ko and Dan as taught by Kim and include Kim’s similar device having: Claim 5: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and at least one fork connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 6: wherein the transfer shaft comprises a plurality of shafts provided in a horizontal direction Claim 7: wherein the at least one fork comprises a plurality of forks separated by a gap in a vertical direction.; Claim 13: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and a plurality of forks connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; Claim 14: wherein the transfer shaft comprises a plurality of shafts provided in a horizontal direction; Claim 15: wherein the controller is configured to independently control operations of the transfer shafts; Claim 16: wherein the plurality of forks are separated by a gap in a vertical direction; Claim 20: wherein each of the plurality of second robots comprises: a transfer shaft configured to rotate about a vertical axis; and a plurality of forks connected to the transfer shaft and configured to transfer at least one of the plurality of semiconductor device carriers between the vehicle and one of the plurality of storages; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of providing a robot with a meandering correcting function and a meandering correcting method are provided to improve productivity by enhancing the linear performance of a robot. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pp. 8-13, filed 10 June 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-20 under Ko et al. have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Ko and Dan et al. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gerald McClain whose telephone number is (571)272-7803. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and at gerald.mcclain@uspto.gov (see MPEP 502.03 (II)). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Gerald McClain/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Feb 19, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703584
HAND, HOLDING DEVICE, AND CARGO-HANDLING SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701687
SUBSTRATE PICKUP TOOL, SUBSTRATE ASSEMBLY STATION AND SUBSTRATE INSTALLATION METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12680265
Damping element for excavator buckets
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673431
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A SUBSTRATE IN CLEANING MODULES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668437
GRIPPING DEVICE FOR CRATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 791 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month