Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/383,830

LAMINATES, PACKAGING MATERIALS AND PACKAGING BAGS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Priority
Apr 26, 2021 — JP 2021-074071 +5 more
Examiner
MIGGINS, MICHAEL C
Art Unit
1782
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toppan Holdings Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
829 granted / 1026 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1069
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1026 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-9 and 14-15 in the reply filed on 12/12/25 is acknowledged. Claims 10-13 and 16-26 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/12/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-8 and 14-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2020-055156 (English machine translation provided herein) in view of JP2020-196791 (English machine translation provided herein). JP2020-055156 discloses a packaging bag comprising a laminate, comprising: a substrate layer; and a sealant layer, laminated in this order, wherein the substrate layer and the sealant layer contain polyethylene, and a ratio of polyethylene in the laminate is 90 mass% or greater (paragraphs [0006-0012], [0015], [0018], [0022-0023], [0027], [0035], [0054-0055], [0061-0062], [0068-0069], [0132-0133], [0138]). JP2020-055156 does not disclose a protective layer wherein the protective layer contains a thermosetting resin or a resin having a melting point of 160°C or higher. JP2020-196791 discloses a packaging bag comprising a polyethylene laminate and a protective layer wherein the protective layer contains a thermosetting resin or a resin having a melting point of 160°C or higher (paragraphs [0007-0009], [0017-0019], [0028-0034], [0043-0052], [0072], [0091]) for the purpose of providing improved recyclability and/or blocking resistance. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was made to have provided a protective layer wherein the protective layer contains a thermosetting resin or a resin having a melting point of 160°C or higher in JP2020-055156 in order to provide improved recyclability and/or blocking resistance as taught or suggested by JP2020-196791. JP2020-055156 discloses a vapor deposition layer between the substrate layer and the sealant layer, wherein the vapor deposition layer contains a metal oxide, wherein the protective layer contains at least one resin selected from the group consisting of polyurethane, polyester, polyamide, polyamideimide and epoxy, comprising an intermediate layer between the substrate layer and the sealant layer, the intermediate layer containing polyethylene, wherein the intermediate layer contains high-density polyethylene or medium-density polyethylene, wherein the substrate layer contains high-density polyethylene or medium-density polyethylene, wherein the sealant layer contains low-density polyethylene (paragraphs [0006-0012], [0015], [0018], [0022-0023], [0027], [0035], [0054-0055], [0061-0062], [0068-0069], [0132-0133], [0138]). Modified JP2020-055156 discloses wherein the protective layer has a thickness of 0.4% or more and 2.0% or less of a total thickness of the laminate since JP2020-055156 discloses an overall thickness of 125 microns (paragraph [0138]) and JP2020-196791 discloses a thickness for the protective layer of 0.3 to 2.0 microns (paragraph [0051]). Claim(s) 6 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2020-055156 (English machine translation provided herein) in view of JP2020-196791 (English machine translation provided herein), as applied to claims 1-5, 7-8 and 14-15 above, and further in view of JP2020-203406 (English machine translation provided herein). Modified JP2020-055156 does not disclose wherein at least one of the substrate layer and the sealant layer is a layer formed of an unstretched polyethylene film, wherein the intermediate layer is a layer formed of an unstretched polyethylene film. JP2020-203406 disclose a packaging bag comprising a polyethylene film wherein at least one of the substrate layer and the sealant layer is a layer formed of an unstretched polyethylene film, wherein the intermediate layer is a layer formed of an unstretched polyethylene film (paragraphs [0001-0004], [0158-0160], [0167], [0180-0186]) for the purpose of providing improved printability and/or flexibility and/or transparency and/or heat sealability. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was made to have provided wherein at least one of the substrate layer and the sealant layer is a layer formed of an unstretched polyethylene film, wherein the intermediate layer is a layer formed of an unstretched polyethylene film in modified JP2020-055156 in order to provide improved printability and/or flexibility and/or transparency and/or heat sealability as taught or suggested by JP2020-203406. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL C MIGGINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1494. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 1-9 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aaron Austin can be reached at 571-272-8935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL C MIGGINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1782 MCM February 9, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 12, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692058
LAMINATE AND STANDING POUCH
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692662
WATER RESISTANT AND REPULPABLE COMPOSITIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686765
MULTILAYER STRUCTURE WITH A HIGH IMPACT RESISTANCE, HIGH MELT FLOW, LOW WATER HAZE CAP LAYER
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673477
Systems and Methods for Fabricating Tote Bags
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675065
ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC BELT AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1026 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month