Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/383,969

REDUCED PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD EXPANSION IN INTEGRATED SENSOR-LENS ASSEMBLIES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Examiner
WU, JAMES
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Gopro Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
501 granted / 713 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 713 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-5 and 11-16 in the reply filed on 2/17/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 6-10 and 17-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 2/17/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jan (US 2015/0116954). Regarding claim 11, Jan discloses a method of assembling an integrated sensor-lens assembly (ISLA) (Figs. 1-2), the method comprising: connecting a lens holder (23, Figs. 1, 2) to a cover glass holder (14, Figs. 1, 2); connecting an image sensor (13, Figs. 1, 2) to a printed circuit board (PCB) (11, 12, Figs. 1, 2); connecting the PCB to the cover glass holder (as shown in Figs. 1, 2); and constraining expansion of the PCB along an optical axis (O1, O2, Fig. 1) of the ISLA so as to maintain focus alignment of the ISLA (see [0020, 0021, 0044]: “…by the arrangement of the flat material, the influence of warpage of the circuit board on the alignment between both optical axes of the image sensor module and the lens module is attenuated, thereby increasing the yield.”). Regarding claim 12, Jan discloses the method of claim 11, and Jan further discloses wherein connecting the PCB to the cover glass holder includes directly connecting the PCB to the cover glass holder (as shown in Figs. 1, 2 where 14 is directly connected to 12 of 11). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5 are allowed. Claims 13-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Re claims 1-5, prior arts do not teach or suggest the ISLA of claim 1, in particular, wherein the PCB includes at least one material having a coefficient of thermal expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 2 ppm/°C to approximately 40 ppm/°C and a coefficient of hygroscopic expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 2 ppm/100% Hu absorption to approximately 20 ppm/100% Hu absorption; and an image sensor connected to the PCB. Re claims 13-16, prior arts do not teach or suggest the method of claim 13, in particular, wherein constraining expansion of the PCB includes forming the PCB from at least one material having a coefficient of thermal expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 2 ppm/°C to approximately 40 ppm/°C and a coefficient of hygroscopic expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 2 ppm/100% Hu absorption to approximately 20 ppm/100% Hu absorption. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Byrne et al. (US 10,645,795) discloses an ISLA (Fig. 2) comprising: a lens holder (24, Fig. 2); a cover glass holder (26, Fig. 2) connected to the lens holder; a PCB (28, Fig. 2) connected to the cover glass holder within an optical tolerance loop of the ISLA (inherent), wherein a thermal management material (22, Fig. 2) is disposed between the PCB and the lens holder (22 between 28 and 26 as shown in Fig. 2), wherein the thermal management material having a coefficient of thermal expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 2 ppm/°C to approximately 40 ppm/°C (col. 3, lns. 15-49; also see claims 1-4 and 12-14). Fukuda et al. (US 9,332,631) discloses a heat dissipating substrate incudes at least one material having a coefficient of thermal expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 2 ppm/°C to approximately 40 ppm/°C (see claims 3 and 4) and a coefficient of hygroscopic expansion that lies substantially within a range of approximately 0 ppm/% RH to 15 ppm/% RH (see claim 5). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES WU whose telephone number is (571)270-7974. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Parker can be reached at (303)297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602081
Electronic Devices with Translating Flexible Display and Corresponding Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597371
CONNECTING ASSEMBLY AND ASSEMBLED DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579917
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING MULTIPLE FRAME-MOUNTED DISPLAY MODULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578770
HINGE MECHANISM FOR MOUNTING A PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD IN AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572187
STORAGE DEVICE CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 713 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month