Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/384,050

SKIN PENETRATION ENHANCER FOR ROYAL JELLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Priority
Dec 16, 2022 — JP 2022-201184
Examiner
BOECKELMAN, JACOB A
Art Unit
1655
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Yamada Bee Company Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allowance Rate
90 granted / 258 resolved
-25.1% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+46.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
92 currently pending
Career history
374
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 258 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/31/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/17/206 and 06/23/2026 are being considered by the examiner. The signed IDS form is attached with the instant office action. The IDS filed 06/23/20226 is identical to the IDS filed on 06/17/2026 and does not need to be included in the file wrapper. Response to Amendment Applicant's amendment and argument filed 07/31/2026 in response to the final rejection, are acknowledged and have been fully considered. Any previous rejection or objection not mentioned herein is withdrawn. Claims 1-9, 11-18 are pending of which claims 12-15 and 18 remain withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/17/2025. Claims 1-9, 11 and 16-17 are being examined on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Motoki Yumi (JP7137924B2) and Maroula G. Kokotou et. al. (Study of the Royal Jelly Free Fatty Acids by Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS), Metabolites 2020, 10, 40, 1-12). This is a new rejection to consider the amendments filed on 07/10/2026. Yumi teaches of oil-in-water emulsified composition having excellent feel and permeability comprising a solution which contains a copolymer of (meth) acryloyldimethyltaurate (see abstract) and teaches specifically using (acryloyldimethyltaurate ammonium beheneth-25 methacrylate) crosspolymer (see page 3, 2nd para.). Yumi also teaches one can include royal jelly as an activator (see page 11, para. 8). Kokotou is relied upon to show why it would have been obvious to select the royal jelly in Yumi’s invention. Kokotou teaches that “Royal jelly (RJ), a secretion from the hypopharyngeal and mandibular glands of worker bees, has been used since ancient times in traditional medicine, and it is currently used as a functional food and in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic fields” (see Introduction, 1st para.). Kokotou teaches that royal jelly has bioactive properties such as antibacterial, immunomodulatory, wound-healing, growth promoting, vasodilative and hypotensive, anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities. Many of the biological properties of royal jelly are attributed to its unusual bioactive fatty acid components, in particular to 10-HAD (trans-10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid). More recently, the in vitro anti-inflammatory effects of these RJ fatty acids as well as sebacic acid (decanedioic acid) was evaluated and compared in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (see bottom of page 1, top of page 2). Kokotou teaches royal jelly comprises of 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid, decenedioic acid, or sebacic acid (see table 1). Therefore it would have been oblivious to persons having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use ammonium acryloyldimethyltaurate/methacrylic acid beheneth-25) crosspolymer or indeed to combine both Yumi and Kokotou’s art in the method for enhancing permeability of royal jelly into skin because Yumi teaches to include compositions comprising this copolymer for increasing penetration onto skin and to include them in formulations which can also comprise of royal jelly. There would have been a reasonable expectation of success in arriving at the instant invention given the prior art because Yumi discloses formulations which increase permeability. Claims 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Motoki Yumi (JOP7137924B2) and Maroula G. Kokotou et. al. (Study of the Royal Jelly Free Fatty Acids by Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS), Metabolites 2020, 10, 40, 1-12) as applied to claims 1-9 and 11 above, and further in view of Cho Yun Hi et. al. (KR20160037612A) and Asakura Takayuki et. al. (JP5750404B2). This is a new rejection to consider the amendments filed on 07/10/2026. Yumi and Kokotou teach the instant method of increasing the penetration or royal jelly however are silent on the royal jelly being obtained by filtering enzymatically treated royal jelly solution through a filter having a pore size of 3 um and wherein the cosmetic composition comprises butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, and phenoxyethanol. Hi teaches a cosmetic composition capable of enhancing skin moisturizing effects by containing freeze-dried royal jelly which is treated with protease enzymes (see abstract). Hi teaches the composition on skin (see 1st para, page 10, example 5). Hi teaches “inactivating royal jelly which has been enzymatically reacted in the above production method may be followed by a step of filtering the mesh for removal of foreign substances” (see page 7). Hi does not specifically teach the composition to include butylene glycol, pentylene glycol, and phenoxyethanol. Takayuki teaches antibacterial agents in cosmetics (see abstract). Takayuki teaches cosmetic compositions which comprise of royal jelly extract, butylene glycol, pentylene glycol and phenoxyethanol (see page 10, example 1) and teaches this plurality of combined components can act as mositurizers, thickeners, preservatives, emulsifiers, medicinal components, emulsion stabilizers etc. (see page 6 para. 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to persons having ordinary skill before the effective filing date to use enzyme treated royal jelly as taught by Hi to increase the moisturizing properties of the royal jelly and to use butylene glycol, pentylene glycol and phenoxyethanol as additional cosmetic combined agents to act as emulsion stabilizers, moisturizers, thickeners and preservatives etc. It would have also been obvious to select the filter size as being 3um as this is an optimization well within any skilled artisan for a means of not letting contaminants through in the final product. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/31/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that previously relied upon art does not teach mixing the newly amended cross polymer with royal jelly. The Office relies on new art to show that it would have been obvious to mix royal jelly with (acryloyldimethyltaurate ammonium beheneth-25 methacrylate) crosspolymer for enhancing permeability as Yumi indeed teaches formulations which include both the cross polymer and royal jelly and teaches that these formulations are known for enhancing permeability. Conclusion Currently no claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB ANDREW BOECKELMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-0043. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anand Desai can be reached at 571-272-0947. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACOB A BOECKELMAN Examiner, Art Unit 1655 /ANAND U DESAI/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 20, 2026
Response Filed
May 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 31, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708655
BOTANICALS AS WNT/BETA-CATENIN ACTIVATORS, MOLECULAR PATHWAY REGULATORS, TISSUE REGENERATORS AND HEALTH BIOMARKER REGULATORS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12661382
METHOD FOR OBTAINING OLEOCANTHAL TYPE SECOIRIDOIDS AND FOR PRODUCING RESPECTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661375
NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12622933
Method for Improving Eye Condition
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622938
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+46.5%)
3y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 258 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month