Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/384,374

AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF DEFIBRILLATION PAD LOCATION ON PATIENT'S CHEST

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Priority
Feb 24, 2016 — continuation of 10/383,789 +1 more
Examiner
SHAHINIAN, LEVON J
Art Unit
1711
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Physio-control Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
717 granted / 838 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 838 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The communication dated 5/26/2026 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 1-3 and 16-23 were canceled. Claim 5 was amended. Claims 24-31 were added. Claims 4-15 and 24-31 are currently pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 5/26/2026 is acknowledged. Newly submitted claims 24-31 are directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: Inventions Group I and Group II are related as product and process of use. The inventions can be shown to be distinct if either or both of the following can be shown: (1) the process for using the product as claimed can be practiced with another materially different product or (2) the product as claimed can be used in a materially different process of using that product. See MPEP § 806.05(h). In the instant case the method of Group II can be practiced with another materially different product such as one which utilizes an electromagnetic signal other than ultra-wide band. Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 24-31 are withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. To preserve a right to petition, the reply to this action must distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. Otherwise, the election shall be treated as a final election without traverse. Traversal must be timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are subsequently added, applicant must indicate which of the subsequently added claims are readable upon the elected invention. Should applicant traverse on the ground that the inventions are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the inventions to be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 7-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Walker et al. U.S. Publication 2019/0365600 (henceforth referred to as Walker). As for claim 7, Walker teaches a device (Fig. 1: part 100), comprising: a transmitter (Fig. 1: parts 138, 140, and 142) configured to transmit an UWB signal; a receiver (paragraph [0023]) configured to receive a reflection of the UWB signal from a wearable device or a medical device; and a processor (Fig. 1: part 132) configured to: determine a time-of-flight of the UWB signal between the transmitter and the receiver (paragraph [0023]); and determine a position of the wearable device or the medical device by analyzing the time-of-flight of the signal (paragraph [0052]). As for claim 8, Walker further teaches: a backboard or a support device (Fig. 1: part 136) comprising the transmitter and the receiver, and wherein the processor is configured to determine the position of the wearable device or the medical device by determining a distance between the wearable device or the medical device and the backboard or the support device (paragraph [0052]). As for claim 9, Walker further teaches that the wearable device comprises a glove worn by a rescuer (paragraph [0024]). As for claim 10, Walker further teaches that the medical device comprises a mechanical chest compression device (paragraphs [0071]-[0075]). As for claim 11, Walker further teaches that the receiver is configured to receive the reflection of the UWB signal from an adjunct disposed in a suction cup or pressure plate of the mechanical chest compression device (paragraphs [0040] and [0065]). As for claim 12, Walker further teaches that the processor is further configured to: identify that the UWB signal has been reflected from the wearable device or the medical device by identifying a spectral signature of the reflection of the UWB signal (paragraph [0024]). As for claim 13, Walker further teaches that the processor is further configured determine a depth of a chest compression performed on a subject by analyzing the position of the wearable device or the medical device (paragraphs [0027] and [0045]). As for claim 14, Walker further teaches that the processor is further configured to: detect a recoil of a chest compression performed on a subject by analyzing the position of the wearable device or the medical device (paragraph [0024]). As for claim 15, Walker further teaches: an output device (Fig. 1: part 131) configured to output an indication of the position of the wearable device or the medical device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Walker et al. U.S. Publication 2019/0365600, the closest prior art, differs from the instant claims in failing to teach determine a time-of-flight of the UWB signal between the transmitter, the wearable device, and the receiver; determine a distance between the wearable device and the support device by analyzing the time-of-flight of the UWB signal between the transmitter, the wearable device, and the receiver; determine a depth of a chest compression administered by the rescuer to the subject by analyzing the distance between the wearable device and the support device. Furthermore, it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system taught by Walker as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEVON J SHAHINIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1384. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at (571)272-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEVON J SHAHINIAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747919
Tractor Radiator Cleaning Arrangement
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747529
CLOTHES CARE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746892
VEHICLE TREATMENT SYSTEM WITH TACTILE COLLISION DETECTION DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745481
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REFURBISHING BACK SIDES OF SOLAR MODULES
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729472
LAUNDRY TREATMENT APPLIANCE AND WATER SAVING METHODS FOR LAUNDRY TREATMENT APPLIANCES
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (-6.5%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 838 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month