Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/384,384

SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS INCLUDING ECCENTRICITY CORRECTION UNIT, AND SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0180062
Examiner
TEKA, ABIY
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Semes Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
590 granted / 695 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 695 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of Claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 07/29/2026 is acknowledged. Applicant states the restriction fails to provide adequate reason for the restriction. The examiner respectfully disagrees, as stated in the previous action, the method claims require different search strings and queries along with different search strategies that present a burden on examination. As such, the restriction is proper and it is accordingly maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takaya et al (US 6, 062,953). Regarding Claim 6 Takaya teaches a substrate treatment apparatus including an eccentricity correction unit (10) correcting eccentricity of a substrate supported by a support unit (structure that holes wafer W), the substrate treatment apparatus comprising: a first correction unit (34A,B) including a first contact portion in contact with a plurality of points of a side surface of the substrate having a notch (N) formed in a periphery thereof, and a first drive unit (30) configured to move a position of the substrate such that a center of the substrate corresponds to a center of the support unit (structure that holes wafer W); and a second correction unit (56) including a second contact portion (Fig 2b)in contact with the other side surface of the substrate having the notch (N) formed in the periphery thereof (Fig 2b), a second drive unit (66) configured to change a position of the second contact portion, and an elastic portion (springs) configured to provide elastic force in a direction of movement of the second contact portion (Fig 2b)to press or depressurize the substrate (Col 5. Lns.38-45), wherein the first correction unit (34A,B) is in contact with a plurality of point (Fig 2), included one axis on a horizontal plane, among the points, and the second correction unit (56) is in contact with a point included on an axis, parallel to the one axis (Fig 1-2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takaya. in view of KIKUMOTO et al. (US 2018/0350632 A1) hereinafter Kikumoto. Regarding Claim 1 Takaya teaches a substrate treatment apparatus including an eccentricity correction unit (10) correcting eccentricity of a substrate supported by a support unit (structure that holes wafer W), the substrate treatment apparatus comprising: a first correction unit (34A,B) including a first contact portion (contacts four points of the wafer which has notch N see Fig 2a, 2b) in contact with a plurality of points of a side surface of the substrate having a notch (N) formed in a periphery thereof, (Fig 2a-2b) and a first drive unit (30)configured to move a position of the substrate such that a center of the substrate corresponds to a center (O) of the support unit (structure that holes wafer W); and a second correction unit (56)including a second contact portion (Fig 2b) in contact with the other side surface of the substrate having the notch (N) formed in the periphery thereof (Fig 2a-2b), a second drive unit (66)configured to change a position of the second contact portion (Fig 1-2), and an elastic portion (springs) configured to provide elastic force in a direction of movement of the second contact portion (Fig 2b) to press or depressurize the substrate (Col 5. Lns.38-45), Takaya is silent regarding wherein a portion of the second contact portion in contact with the other side surface of the substrate being configured to be flat. However, Kikumoto teaches a substrate adjusting mechanism (Fig 5) for adjusting a wafer (w) having a correction unit (45) having a contact portion with the wafer (Fig 5). Takaya further teaches wherein the portion (46a) of the contact portion in contact with the other side surface of the substrate (W) is configured to be flat (since it is a V shape) (see Par.00153). Since both Takaya and Kikumoto are in the same field of endvaour and both teach known wafer centering devices, it would have been obvious to have replaced one device for the other by forming a portion of the second contact portion in contact with the other side surface of the substrate to be flat to achieve a predictable result of forming a wafer adjusting device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 and 7-12 are objected to but would be allowable if rewritten including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. PNG media_image1.png 485 587 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIY TEKA whose telephone number is (571)272-9804. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11-9 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIY TEKA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735869
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729772
ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED HYDRAULIC VALVE COMPONENTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729732
PISTON FOR A DISK BRAKE, DISK BRAKE HAVING AT LEAST ONE PISTON, AND SERIES OF PISTONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723373
HYDRAULIC DRIVE DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12704108
Axial Piston Machine with Neutral Valve Integrated in the Pot-Like Housing Part
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 695 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month