Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/385,072

Panty Replacement Worn With Outerwear

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Examiner
ANDERSON, CATHARINE L
Art Unit
3781
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Skimpies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
704 granted / 1076 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 13 discloses “the middle tapered portion” in lines 1-2. Previously, a tapered middle portion was disclosed. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the product" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For purposes of examination, the product will be considered to refer to the panty replacement. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 and 7-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mateo (2010/0280476). With respect to claim 1, Mateo discloses a panty replacement, as shown in figure 7, comprising a cotton layer, as disclosed in paragraph [0046], comprising a first end 41, a second end 43, and a tapered middle portion 42 wherein a width of the middle portion 42 is less than a width of the first and second ends 41 and 43. An adhesive layer 22 forms a bottom surface of the panty replacement, as shown in figure 7, and is configured to affix the panty replacement to a crotch area of an outerwear garment, as shown in figure 4 and disclosed in paragraph [0034]. Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the first and second ends being substantially rounded. Mateo discloses in paragraph [0046] that the shape of the panty replacement can have soft curved edges, but does not explicitly disclose the embodiment of figure 7 has curved edges. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the first and second ends of Mateo substantially rounded to achieve the predictable result of soft, curved edges that are more comfortable to the wearer. With respect to claim 2, Mateo discloses one cotton layer, as disclosed in paragraph [0046]. With respect to claim 3, Mateo discloses a backing layer coupled between the cotton layer and the adhesive layer, as disclosed in paragraph [0032]. With respect to claim 7, Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the cotton layer comprising an organic cotton material. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the cotton layer of Mateo from an organic cotton material to achieve the predictable result of using an environmentally friendly material that was sustainably harvested. With respect to claim 8, Mateo discloses the adhesive layer comprises a pressure sensitive adhesive, as disclosed in paragraph [0046]. With respect to claim 9, Mateo discloses the outerwear garment is pants, as disclosed in paragraph [0034]. The panty replacement of Mateo is fully capable of being attached to leggings. With respect to claim 10, Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the ratio of the length to a largest width of the first end being about 3. Mateo discloses in paragraph [0038] that the panty replacement can be made in a variety of shapes and sizes to accommodate different wearers and uses. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the ratio of the length to a largest width of the first end of Mateo about 3 to achieve the predictable result of a panty replacement that is shaped and sized to fit a particular wearer. With respect to claim 11, Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the length of the panty replacement being approximately 6 inches. Mateo discloses in paragraph [0038] that the panty replacement can be made in a variety of shapes and sizes to accommodate different wearers and uses. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the length of the panty replacement of Mateo approximately 6 to achieve the predictable result of a panty replacement that is shaped and sized to fit a particular wearer. With respect to claim 12, Mateo discloses the largest width of the first and second ends 41 and 43 are the same, as shown in figure 7. With respect to claim 13, Mateo discloses a length from a smallest width of the middle portion 42 to the largest width of the first end 41 is the same as a length from the middle portion 42 to the largest width of the second end 43, as shown in figure 7. With respect to claim 14, Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the ratio of a smallest width of the middle portion to a largest width of the first end being about 0.75. Mateo discloses in paragraph [0038] that the panty replacement can be made in a variety of shapes and sizes to accommodate different wearers and uses. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the ratio of the smallest width of the middle portion to a largest width of the first end of Mateo about 0.75 to achieve the predictable result of a panty replacement that is shaped and sized to fit a particular wearer. With respect to claim 15, Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the smallest width of the middle portion being about 1.5 inches. Mateo discloses in paragraph [0038] that the panty replacement can be made in a variety of shapes and sizes to accommodate different wearers and uses. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the smallest width of the middle portion of Mateo about 1.5 inches to achieve the predictable result of a panty replacement that is shaped and sized to fit a particular wearer. With respect to claim 16, Mateo discloses the adhesive layer 22 covers the entire bottom surface of the middle portion 42, as disclosed in paragraph [0030]. With respect to claim 17, Mateo discloses the adhesive layer 22 covers the entire bottom surface of the cotton layer 10, as disclosed in paragraph [0030]. With respect to claim 18, Mateo discloses that the adhesive element 22 can be smaller than the bottom surface, as disclosed in paragraph [0031], and therefore will cover the bottom portion except for a small region at the edges. With respect to claim 19, Mateo discloses the adhesive layer 22 can comprise a plurality of spaced apart strips, as disclosed in paragraph [0030]. With respect to claim 20, Mateo shows in figure 1 that the adhesive region 22 can extend to the edges of the panty replacement. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the adhesive strips of Mateo run from a first edge to a second edge to achieve the predictable result of adhesive that can secure the entire length of the panty replacement to a garment. Claim(s) 4-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mateo (2010/0280476) in view of Carlucci et al. (6,436,080). With respect to claim 4, Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the backing layer comprising a perforated region. Carlucci teaches providing a backing layer with a perforated region to make the layer gas permeable, as disclosed in column 11, lines 12-23. It would therefore have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the backing layer of Mateo with a perforated region, as taught by Carlucci, to make the backing layer breathable to achieve the predictable result of improving wearer comfort. With respect to claim 5, Carlucci teaches the backing layer 50 has regions that are covered by adhesive 90 and regions that are not covered by adhesive 82, as shown in figure 2, wherein the regions that are not covered by adhesive include perforations. It is noted that it is within the scope of the claim as presently written that the perforated regions can also be located in the regions that are covered by adhesive. With respect to claim 6, modified Mateo discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the perforated regions passing through the cotton layer. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the perforated regions pass through the cotton layer of Mateo to achieve the predictable result of making the entire panty replacement breathable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patents and Publications 2022/0117317; 2006/0150303; 8,118,798; 7,805,768; 7,240,375; and 6,681,407 disclose panty replacements. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LYNNE ANDERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sarah Al-Hashimi can be reached at 571-272-7159. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CATHARINE L ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 11, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594198
DISPOSABLE WEARING ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582806
Female Catheter Guide
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575977
Composition for wet indicator
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575545
PET DIAPER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558273
BREATHABLE ABSORBENT ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+20.8%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month