Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/385,088

SHIM FOR BRAKE PAD AND BRAKE PAD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Priority
May 31, 2023 — DE 102023205097.8
Examiner
KING, BRADLEY T
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
HL Mando Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
680 granted / 961 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1000
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 5/08/2024 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(3)(i) because it does not include a concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently understood by the individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) most knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each reference listed that is not in the English language. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. There is no statement of relevance for the German Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-11 and 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 7-156172 in view of Clercq et al (US# 2002/0182961). JP ‘172 disclose a shim for a brake pad comprising: a plurality of first wires made of a plastic material (polyamide fiber) or a rubber material and formed in a single sheet shape. [0014] JP ‘172 lacks a plurality of second wires made of a metal material. Clercq et al disclose a reinforced fabric made of polyamide fibers woven with metal wires [0077] to provide a high strength fabric. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include metal wires such as taught by Clercq et al in the fabric of JP ‘172 to improve the strength and durability of the shim. Regarding claim 2, as modified, the single sheet shape is formed by the plurality of first wires being disposed in a first direction as a longitudinal direction and the plurality of second wires being disposed in a second direction crossing the first direction as a longitudinal direction. Note the figure of JP ’17 and figures 1a-1b of Clercq et al. Regarding claim 3, as modified, the single sheet shape is formed by the plurality of first wires being spaced apart from each other at predetermined intervals and the plurality of second wires being spaced apart from each other at predetermined intervals. Note the figure of JP ’17 and figures 1a-1b of Clercq et al. Regarding claim 4, single sheet shape is formed with a plurality of curves. Note the wires curve as they weave around one another. Note the figure of JP ’17 and figures 1a-1b of Clercq et al. Regarding claim 5, JP ‘172 discloses the fabric having a thickness .03-5mm or .1-2mm [0008] suggesting of a diameter of each of the plurality of second wires a range of 0.3 mm or more and 0.5 mm or less. The diameters of the fibers appear to be approximately half the thickness of the fabric. Regarding claim 6, a thickness of the shim for a brake pad is included in a range of 0.6 mm or more and 1.2 mm or less. JP ‘172 [0014] discloses a thickness of .84mm Regarding claim 7, JP ‘172 discloses a brake pad [0001] comprising: a friction member in contact with a friction surface of a brake disk [0001]; a back plate having front and rear surfaces and supporting the friction member [0001]; and a shim disposed on the rear surface of the back plate [0001], wherein the shim includes a plurality of first wires made of a plastic material (polyamide fiber) or a rubber material. JP ‘172 lacks a plurality of second wires made of a metal material. Clercq et al disclose a reinforced fabric made of polyamide fibers woven with metal wires [0077] to provide a high strength fabric. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include metal wires such as taught by Clercq et al in the fabric of JP ‘172 to improve the strength and durability of the shim. Regarding claim 8, as modified, the plurality of first wires are disposed in a first direction as a longitudinal direction and the plurality of second wires are disposed in a second direction crossing the first direction as a longitudinal direction. Note the figure of JP ’17 and figures 1a-1b of Clercq et al. Regarding claim 9, as modified, the plurality of first wires are spaced apart from each other at predetermined intervals and the plurality of second wires are spaced apart from each other at predetermined intervals. Note the figure of JP ’17 and figures 1a-1b of Clercq et al. Regarding claim 10, JP ‘172 discloses the fabric having a thickness .03-5mm or .1-2mm [0008] suggesting of a diameter of each of the plurality of second wires a range of 0.3 mm or more and 0.5 mm or less. The diameters of the fibers appear to be approximately half the thickness of the fabric. Regarding claim 11, a thickness of the shim for a brake pad is included in a range of 0.6 mm or more and 1.2 mm or less. JP ‘172 [0014] discloses a thickness of .84mm Regarding claim 15, JP ‘172 discloses a shim for a brake pad [0001] comprising: a plurality of first wires made of a plastic material (polyamide fiber) or a rubber material. JP ‘172 further disclose a plurality of second wires, wherein one layer (fabric) is formed by the plurality of first wires being spaced apart from each other at predetermined intervals in a first direction as a longitudinal direction and the plurality of second wires being spaced apart from each other at predetermined intervals in a second direction crossing the first direction as a longitudinal direction, and one surface of the layer (fabric) attached to a back plate of a brake pad is formed with a plurality of curves. See the figure. JP ‘172 lack the disclosure of the second wires being made of a metal material. Clercq et al disclose a reinforced fabric made of polyamide fibers woven with metal wires [0077] to provide a high strength fabric. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include metal wires such as taught by Clercq et al in the fabric of JP ‘172 to improve the strength and durability of the shim. Regarding claim 16, JP ‘172 discloses the fabric having a thickness .03-5mm or .1-2mm [0008] suggesting of a diameter of each of the plurality of second wires a range of 0.3 mm or more and 0.5 mm or less. The diameters of the fibers appear to be approximately half the thickness of the fabric. Regarding claim 17, a thickness of the shim for a brake pad is included in a range of 0.6 mm or more and 1.2 mm or less. JP ‘172 [0014] discloses a thickness of .84mm Claims 12-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 7-156172 and Clercq et al (US# 2002/0182961), as applied to claim 7 above, in further view of Kulis, Jr et al (US# 5413194). Regarding claim 12, JP 7-156172 and Clercq et al, as applied above disclose all the limitations of the instant claim with exception to the shim being attached to the rear surface of the back plate through an adhesive. JP ‘172 discloses forming the shim with an adhesive (phenolic resin), but do not provide details on the attachment to the backing plate. Kulis Jr et al disclose a brake pad and further teach adhering shim material to a backing plate by molding it integrally with the friction material. Figures 6-8. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to integrally mold the shim of JP ‘172 and Clercq et al to the backing plate, as taught by Kulis Jr as an efficient means of forming a durable brake pad. Regarding claim 13, as modified, one surface of the shim that comes into contact with the rear surface of the back plate is formed with a plurality of curvatures. Regarding claim 14, as modified, the adhesive is filled cavities between the plurality of first wires and the plurality of second wires, and the rear surface of the back plate. Claim 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 7-156172 and Clercq et al (US# 2002/0182961), as applied to claim 7 above, in further view of Lindsly et al (US# 2018/0259017). Regarding claim 12, JP 7-156172 and Clercq et al, as applied above disclose all the limitations of the instant claim with exception to the shim being attached to the rear surface of the back plate through an adhesive. Lindsly et al disclose a brake pad and further teach bonding the shim with adhesive [0017]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use adhesive to bond the shim of modified JP’172, as taught by Lindsly et al, as an obvious and inexpensive means of retaining the shim in the proper position. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRADLEY T KING whose telephone number is (571)272-7117. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571 272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRADLEY T KING/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 BTK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679531
ROTORCRAFT WITH A NON-RETRACTABLE WHEEL-TYPE LANDING GEAR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679317
HYDRAULIC BLOCK OF A POWER BRAKE SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673647
ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE SYSTEM FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE, METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662097
BRAKE SYSTEM APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND ARRANGEMENTS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12612021
REDUNDANT BRAKING SYSTEM HAVING PRESSURE SUPPLY FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND VEHICLES HAVING AUTONOMOUS DRIVING OF LEVEL 3 (HAD) TO LEVEL 4 (FAD)
4y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+23.5%)
3y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month