Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/385,246

HIGH VOLUME BRANDING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Priority
Oct 28, 2022 — provisional 63/420,325
Examiner
TRAN, TIFFANY T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
T&T Consulting And Engineering Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
159 granted / 269 resolved
-0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+49.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
291
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 269 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/30/2023. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 15-19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 15 and 19, the system of claim 14, but there is no claim 14 is the current set. Claims 16-18 objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claims 10-12 and being depended upon claim 8. When the claims 10-12 and 16-18 in the application are duplicates or so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as failing to set forth the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the term “high volume” in line 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high volume” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 8 and 13 recite the same term “high volume” in line 1 and they are rejected by the same reason as discussed in claim 1. Claims 2-7, 9-12 and 15-20 are rejected as being dependent on, and failing to cure the deficiencies of, rejected independent claims 1, 8 and 13. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Cohen (US20180317711A1) discloses an imprinting device designed to create images upon a variety of food products for decoration and/or marketing purposes, in particularly baked dough products such as flat bread or pitta. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIFFANY T TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3673. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday, 10am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edward Landrum can be reached on (571) 272-5567. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIFFANY T TRAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739948
ELECTRIC HEATER AND METHOD OF MAKING AN ELECTRIC HEATER
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734605
HANDHELD LASER MACHINING APPARATUS FOR MACHINING A WORKPIECE, AND FUNNEL FOR A HANDHELD LASER MACHINING APPARATUS
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736227
HOUSEHOLD COOKING APPLIANCE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733670
Breading and Sifting Station
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727713
Fried Food Preparation System
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.0%)
4y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 269 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month