Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/385,848

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO MODULATE SIGNALS USING MULTI-CLASS MODULATION CIRCUITRY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, HIEU P
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
1123 granted / 1220 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1245
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1220 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 10/31/2023, 03/25/2025 and 01/13/2026 has been considered and placed in the application file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by HUANG et al. (U.S. 2012/0229207). Regarding claim 15, Huang et al. (hereinafter, Ref~207) discloses (please see fig. 2 and related text for details) an apparatus comprising: first amplifier circuitry (top channel of Fig. 2) having a first input (Vin-), a second input (Vin+), and an output (Vout1 of Fig. 2); and second amplifier circuitry (bottom channel of Fig. 2) including: third amplifier circuitry (e.g. 244/264 of Fig. 2) having a first input (Vin-), a second input (Vin+), and an output (SDri2 of Fig. 2), the first input of the third amplifier circuitry coupled (via C1 of Fig. 2) to the first input (Vin-) of the first amplifier circuitry and the output of the first amplifier circuitry (please note that Vin- is coupled to Vout1 via feedback resistor as shown in Fig. 2), the second input (Vin+) of the third amplifier circuitry coupled to the second input (Vin-) of the first amplifier circuitry as seen; and output stage circuitry (284 of Fig. 2) having an input (SDri2 of Fig. 2) and an output (Vout2), the input of the output stage circuitry coupled to the output of the third amplifier circuitry, the output of the output stage circuitry coupled (via feedback resistor) to the second input of the first amplifier circuitry as seen, meeting claim 15. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 1-7 are allowed over the prior art of record. The prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest the claimed circuit comprising, among other limitations and unobvious limitations of “class AB amplifier circuitry having a first input, a second input, a third input, and an output, the first input of the class AB amplifier circuitry coupled to the first input of the class D amplifier circuitry and the output of the class D amplifier circuitry, the second and third inputs of the class AB amplifier circuitry coupled to the second and third inputs of the class D amplifier circuitry, and the output of the class AB amplifier circuitry.” structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claims. Claims 8-14 are allowed over the prior art of record. The prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest the claimed circuit comprising, among other limitations and unobvious limitations of “second amplifier circuitry including: modulator circuitry having a first input, a second input, a first output, and a second output, the first input of the modulator circuitry coupled to the first input of the first amplifier circuitry and the output of the first amplifier circuitry, the second input of the modulator circuitry coupled to the second input of the first amplifier circuitry; combination circuitry having a first input, a second input, and an output, the first input of the combination circuitry coupled to the first output of the modulator circuitry, the second input of the combination circuitry coupled to the second output of the modulator circuitry; feedforward circuitry having a first input, a second input, and an output, the first input of the feedforward circuitry coupled to the output of the combination circuitry, the second input of the feedforward circuitry coupled to the output of the first amplifier circuitry; comparison circuitry having an input and an output, the input of the comparison circuitry coupled to the output of the feedforward circuitry; and output stage circuitry having an input and an output, the input of the output stage circuitry coupled to the output of the comparison circuitry, the output of the output stage circuitry coupled to the first input of first amplifier and the first input of the modulator circuitry.” structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIEU P NGUYEN whose telephone number is 571-272-8577. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8:30AM-6:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached on 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 703-872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HIEU P NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603618
SIGNAL AMPLIFYING CIRCUIT AND SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM AND ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTING SYSTEM COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603616
POWER AMPLIFIER MODULE WITH INTERLEAVED WIREBONDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597899
SWITCHING AMPLIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597898
HIGH-FREQUENCY CIRCUIT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597891
CASCODED HIGH-VOLTAGE AMPLIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1220 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month