Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/385,907

MOTOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Examiner
VO, ETHAN NGUYEN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
HL Mando Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
25 granted / 36 resolved
+1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.2%
+22.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 3-7, 11-12, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim (US 2021/0281139) and in view of Kim (KR 20200032566). As to claim 1, Lim discloses a motor (Paragraph 0044), comprising: a stator (Fig. 2) formed by coupling a plurality of split cores (310; Fig. 2) including a tooth part (312; Fig. 2) and a yoke part (311; Fig. 2); and a housing (100; Fig. 2) receiving the stator and having a plurality of inner grooves (130; Fig. 2 and Fig. 3) formed in an inner surface contacting the yoke part. PNG media_image1.png 565 550 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 547 459 media_image2.png Greyscale Lim fails to disclose wherein one or more outer grooves are formed on an outer surface of the yoke part, the inner grooves and the outer grooves are circumferentially spaced apart so as not to overlap in a radial direction, a space if formed between the outer surface of the yoke part and the inner grooves, and a space is formed between the inner surface of the housing and the outer grooves. Kim, however, discloses wherein one or more outer grooves are formed on an outer surface of the yoke part (Fig. 3), the inner grooves and the outer grooves are circumferentially spaced apart so as not to overlap in a radial direction (Fig. 3), a space is formed between the outer surface of the yoke part and the inner grooves, and a space is formed between the inner surface of the housing and the outer grooves (Fig. 3). PNG media_image3.png 498 628 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the motor of Lim with one or more outer grooves are formed on an outer surface of the yoke part, the inner grooves and the outer grooves are circumferentially spaced apart so as not to overlap in a radial direction, a space if formed between the outer surface of the yoke part and the inner grooves, and a space is formed between the inner surface of the housing and the outer grooves, as disclosed by Kim, to provide spacing between the yoke and the housing. As to claim 3, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the housing and the stator are press fitted to each other (Paragraph 0061 of Lim). As to claim 4, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the inner grooves are circumferentially arranged in the inner surface of the housing (Fig. 2 of Lim). PNG media_image4.png 589 621 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 5, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein each of the inner grooves is extended from one end to another end of the housing in an axial direction of the housing (Fig. 4 of Lim). PNG media_image5.png 542 561 media_image5.png Greyscale As to claim 6, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the inner grooves formed in the inner surface of the housing are in a rectangular shape (Fig. 3 of Lim). PNG media_image6.png 688 519 media_image6.png Greyscale As to claim 7, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the inner grooves formed in the inner surface of the housing are in a polygonal shape (Fig. 3 of Lim). PNG media_image7.png 685 509 media_image7.png Greyscale As to claim 11, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the outer grooves are shaped as rectangular grooves (Fig. 3 of Kim). PNG media_image8.png 484 410 media_image8.png Greyscale As to claim 12, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the outer grooves are shaped as a polygonal groove (Fig. 3 of Kim). PNG media_image9.png 484 410 media_image9.png Greyscale As to claim 17, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1, wherein the outer grooves are shaped as a polygonal groove (Fig. 3 of Kim). PNG media_image9.png 484 410 media_image9.png Greyscale Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim, Kim and in view of Brinkhaus (US 2024/0284631). As to claim 2, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1. Lim fails to disclose the housing comprises steel. Brinkhaus, however, discloses the housing comprises steel (Paragraph 0017). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the motor of Lim with the housing comprises steel, as disclosed by Brinkhaus, in order to make the housing more stable and lighter (Paragraph 0017). Claims 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim, Kim, and in view of Kim564 (US 2022/0376564). As to claim 9, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1. Lim fails to disclose a notch is formed in a central portion of the outer surface of the yoke part, and wherein the outer grooves are provided on two opposite sides of the notch. Kim564, however, discloses a notch (313; Fig. 4 of Kim) is formed in a central portion of the outer surface of the yoke part of the stator, and between the outer grooves formed in the outer surface of the yoke part of the stator (Fig. 4 of Kim). PNG media_image10.png 752 629 media_image10.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the motor of Lim with a notch is formed in a central portion of the outer surface of the yoke part, and wherein the outer grooves are provided on two opposite sides of the notch, as disclosed by Kim564, to improve the motor structure. Claim 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim, Kim and in view of Wang (US 2005/0212378). As to claim 13, the combination of Lim and Kim discloses the motor of claim 1. Lim fails to disclose a chamfered portion is formed on the outer surface of the yoke part of the stator. Wang, however, discloses a chamfered portion is formed on the outer surface of the yoke part of the stator (Fig. 3a). PNG media_image11.png 393 297 media_image11.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the motor of Lim with a chamfered portion is formed on the outer surface of the yoke part of the stator, as disclosed by Wang, to provide space between the yoke and the housing (Paragraph 0120). Claims 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim and in view of Wang. As to claim 21, the combination of Lim discloses a motor comprising: a stator formed by coupling a plurality of split cores including a tooth part and a yoke part (Fig. 2); and a housing receiving the stator (Fig. 2) and having a plurality of inner grooves formed on an inner surface contacting the yoke part (Fig. 3). PNG media_image1.png 565 550 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 547 459 media_image2.png Greyscale Lim fails to disclose wherein a chamfered portion is formed on an outer surface of the yoke part, and at least one inner groove is disposed in a radial direction of the chamfered portion. Wang, however, discloses a chamfered portion is formed on an outer surface of the yoke part (Fig. 3a). PNG media_image11.png 393 297 media_image11.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the motor of Lim with a chamfered portion is formed on the outer surface of the yoke part of the stator, as disclosed by Wang, to provide space between the yoke and the housing (Paragraph 0120). The combination of Lim and Wang discloses at least one inner groove is disposed in a radial direction of the chamfered portion. PNG media_image2.png 547 459 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 393 297 media_image11.png Greyscale As to claim 22, the combination of Lim and Wang discloses the motor of claim 21, wherein two opposite ends of the yoke part are supported by the housing (Fig. 14 of Wang), and the portion between the two opposite portions supported by the housing are spaced apart from the housing (Fig. 14 of Wang), so that the contact area between the housing and the stator is reduced. PNG media_image12.png 486 459 media_image12.png Greyscale Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ETHAN N VO whose telephone number is (571)270-7593. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached on 571 272 3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ETHAN NGUYEN VO/ Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /CHRISTOPHER M KOEHLER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 24, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603538
ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592597
SELECTIVE PERMEABILITY ROTOR STRUCTURE FOR INTERIOR PERMANENT MAGNET MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587059
Electric Motor Coolant Frame and Header
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580446
ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580501
VIBRATION WAVE RADIATING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+23.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month