Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/386,055

COIL COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0180364
Examiner
BARNES, MALCOLM
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
397 granted / 488 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
517
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
61.3%
+21.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 488 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed on 11/01/2023 has been considered. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species I (Figs. 1-7), claims 1-5, 7-12 and 14-16, without travers in the Applicant’s response on 08/21/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 6 and 13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. In this Office Action, claims 6 and 13 are withdrawn and claims 1-5, 7-12 and 14-16 are examined. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to for poor grammar, in the clause “wherein at least a portion of the first withdrawal portion extend to the first recess, and at least a portion of the second withdrawal portion and second recesses...”. Examiner interprets the clause to mean “wherein at least a portion of the first withdrawal portion extend to the first recess, and at least a portion of the second withdrawal portion extend to the second recess”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1,3-5, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park et. al. (hereinafter Park), U.S. Patent Application Publication 2020/0381170, in view of Lim et al. (hereinafter Lim), U.S. Patent Application Publication 2020/0035404. Regarding Claim 1, Park teaches (except where italicized), a coil component (Fig. 4) comprising: a body (10) including a core (110), and a first surface and a second surface (left, right sides, L-direction, Fig. 1) opposing each other in a first direction, a third surface and a fourth surface (front, rear sides, W-direction, Fig. 1) opposing each other in a second direction, and a fifth surface and a sixth surface (top, bottom sides, T-direction, Fig 1) opposing each other in a third direction, wherein first and second recesses are formed on the third surface and the fourth surface (id.), respectively; a coil (210, 220) disposed inside the body, and including a winding portion (211-214) forming at least one turn using [the] core as an axis, and first and second withdrawal portions (231-234) extending to at least one of a first recess or a second recess (R1, R2); and a first external electrode (100, 200) disposed on the fifth surface of the body, extending to the first (R1) and second recesses, and connected to the first withdrawal portion (231, 232); and a second external electrode (300, 400) disposed on the fifth surface of the body, extending to the first and second (R2) recesses and connected to the second withdrawal portion (233, 234). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Park does not explicitly teach, a first external electrode disposed on the fifth surface of the body, extending to the first and second recesses, and connected to the first withdrawal portion; and a second external electrode disposed on the fifth surface of the body, extending to the first and second recesses and connected to the second withdrawal portion. However, Lim teaches (Fig. 4), a first external electrode (300, 500) disposed on the fifth surface (bottom) of the body, extending to the first (R) and second recesses (R), and connected to the first withdrawal portion (241); and a second external electrode (400, 500) disposed on the fifth surface (bottom) of the body, extending to the first and second recesses (R) and connected to the second withdrawal portion (242). (Lim: Figs. 1-7, 9 and 10, para. [0042], [0056] [0064]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the coil component of Park to include the external electrodes disposed on the fifth surface of the body, extending to the first and second recesses, and connected to the withdrawal portions of Lim, the motivation being so that “the first connection portion 310 disposed in a region among internal walls and lower surfaces of the recesses R in which the first lead-out portion 231 is exposed and may thus be in contact with and connected to the first lead-out portion 231, and the first pad portion 320 extends from the first connection portion 310 to the sixth surface 106 of the body 100” [0078]. (Lim: Figs. 1-7, 9 and 10, para. [0078]). Therefore, the limitation of Claim 1 would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Regarding Claim 3, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein at least a portion of the first withdrawal portion (231, 232) extend to the first recess (R1), and at least a portion of the second withdrawal portion (233, 234) and second [recess] (R2). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein each of the first and second external electrodes includes an extension portion disposed on the fifth surface of the body (Park, Fig. 1) and a connection portion connected to the extension portion and disposed on internal surfaces of the first and second recesses (id.), the first withdrawal portion is in contact with the connection portion of the first external electrode disposed at the first recess (id.), and the second withdrawal portion is in contact with the connection portion of the second external electrode disposed at the second recess (id.). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein at least portion of the first withdrawal portion extends to the first recess (id.). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 7, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein the withdrawal portion is disposed to be biased to one of the third surface and the fourth surface of the body, and the withdrawal portion does not form a turn using the core as an axis (id.). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 8, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein the withdrawal portion is connected to the winding portion in the first direction of the body (id.). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 10, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein the withdrawal portion is connected to the winding portion in the second direction of the body (id., using the broadest reasonable interpretation of ‘connected’). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 12, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, further comprising: a first insulating layer (610, Fig. 4) disposed on the body and the first and second external electrodes, wherein the first insulating layer is disposed along internal surfaces of the first and second recesses (id.), and covers connection portions of the first and second external electrodes (id.), and exposes extension portions of each of the first and second external electrodes (id.). (Park: Figs. 4, 6 and 7, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 14, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, further comprising: a support substrate (251) included in the body, wherein the coil is formed on at least one surface of the support substrate (id.). (Park: Figs. 4, 6 and 7, para. [0034]). Regarding Claim 15, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein the first and second withdrawal portions (231-234) are disposed on one surface of the support substrate opposing the fifth surface of the body and are spaced apart from each other (id.), and the coil further comprises: a first winding portion disposed on one surface of the support substrate (id.) and being contact with the first withdrawal portion (id.), and spaced apart from the second withdrawal portion (id.), and a second winding portion (id.) disposed on the other surface opposing to the one surface of the support substrate, and a via (221, 222) penetrating through the support substrate to connect the first winding portion to the second winding portion (id.). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Regarding Claim 16, the combination of Park in view of Lim further teaches, wherein the coil further comprises: a first auxiliary withdrawal portion (241-244) disposed on the other surface of the support substrate, and being contact with the second winding portion and connected to the second withdrawal portion (id.). (Park: Figs. 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11, para. [0034], [0037], [0047], [0054], [0057]). Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yang et al. (US 20210057138) and Kim et al. (US 20210366641). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 9 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if any of claims 2, 9 and 11 is rewritten in independent form including all of the limitation of the base claims and any intervening claims. Claim 2 recites, inter alia, “…wherein the first and second external electrodes are spaced apart from each other in the first direction of the body”. (Emphasis added). Claim 9 recites, inter alia, “…wherein the withdrawal portion is parallel to the first surface of the body, and extends by a surface passing through a center of the core”. (Emphasis added). Claim 11 recites, inter alia, “…wherein the withdrawal portion is substantially parallel to the third surface of the body, and extends by a surface passing through a center of the core”. (Emphasis added). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALCOLM BARNES whose telephone number is (408)918-7512. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5:00 pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit http s://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MALCOLM BARNES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837 10/12/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770778
COIL COMPONENT
4y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770771
PREFABRICATED TRANSFORMER STATION, OIL-IMMERSED TRANSFORMER, AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772861
Packaging Substrate
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770770
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763244
TRANSFORMER UNIT
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+4.7%)
3y 1m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 488 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month