Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/386,371

DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Priority
Dec 30, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0190860
Examiner
RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 813 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
830
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
81.2%
+41.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi et al. (USPN 2019/0103442). With regard to claim 20, Choi et al. disclose a display apparatus, comprising: a substrate (101); a plurality of pixels (P) having a plurality of subpixels (R,B,G,W); a pattern portion (108) disposed on the substrate and formed to be concave between the plurality of subpixels; and a reflective portion (of 115) disposed to be inclined on the pattern portion, wherein: the plurality of subpixels include a first layer (113) and a second layer (111); the first layer is adjacent to the reflective portion on the substrate (See fig. 4); the first layer includes a plurality of concave portions (See fig. 4); the second layer is on the first layer (see fig. 4); and an inclination angle of the reflective portion is proportional to a maximum thickness of the second layer and a thickness of the first layer in one of the plurality of concave portions (necessarily). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. Claims 21-25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art does not disclose nor render obvious, in combination with the other limitations of the claims, the inclination of the reflective portion being defined as claimed. Claim 1 is therefore allowed and claim 21 would be allowed if rewritten in independent form. Claims 2-19 are allowed due to their dependence upon claim 1 and claims 22-25 would be allowed due to their dependence upon claim 21. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USPN 2017/0155094, 2017/0125489. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Christopher Raabe whose telephone number is (571)272-8434. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 0530-1430. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R Greece can be reached at (571)272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER M RAABE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 02, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641979
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635348
DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING A LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635353
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628495
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622159
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month