Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/387,099

DATA PACKET TRANSMISSION METHOD, COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 06, 2023
Examiner
NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C
Art Unit
2459
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
335 granted / 438 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
460
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 438 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 22 December 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 and 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-6 and 22-23 recite “the acceptable number of lost data packets in the target group is a first number of lost data packets in the target group when the target group is transmitted from a target service server to a user plane function (UPF) network element, the acceptable number of lost data packets in the target group is a second number of lost data packets in the target group when the target group is transmitted from the UPF network element to a network device, the second number being different from the first number”. Since the claim requires that the “target group” “includes” “ a plurality of target data packets” and wherein there are also “lost data packets in the target group”, it is unclear what “data packets” of the “target group” are being referred to in these limitations. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6 and 22-23 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1-6 and 22-23 recite a method and apparatus comprising the steps/functionality of obtaining a target data detection rule and a target processing rule for a target service flow, the target data detection rule indicating a target group identifier of a target group of the target service flow, the target group including a plurality of target data packets, the target processing rule indicating a target-group data packet loss threshold; determining data packet loss information of the target group, the data packet loss information of the target group indicating a number of lost target data packets in the target group; and determining that the target group is a target to-be-discarded group when the number of lost target data packets in the target group indicated by the data packet loss information of the target group is larger than an acceptable number of lost data packets in the target group indicated by the target-group data packet loss threshold, wherein the acceptable number of lost data packets in the target group is a first number of lost data packets in the target group when the target group is transmitted from a target service server to a user plane function (UPF) network element, the acceptable number of lost data packets in the target group is a second number of lost data packets in the target group when the target group is transmitted from the UPF network element to a network device, the second number being different from the first number. The limitations, after further search and consideration as best understood in light of the above raised issues, are distinguished from the cited prior art. This indication of allowable subject matter is contingent upon the anticipated resolution of the remaining issues detailed in this action. In the event that any amendment made to the claims changes the scope of the indicated allowable subject matter, further reconsideration of whether the claims continue to distinguish from the prior art and/or are subject to further rejection under applicable statutes may be deemed necessary. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR § 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. C. Neurauter, Jr. whose telephone number is (571)272-3918. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tonia Dollinger, can be reached at 571-272-4170. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /G. C. Neurauter, Jr./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2459
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 16, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 20, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585945
PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580788
TECHNOLOGIES FOR STABLE HOME LOCATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574324
ROUTE ADVERTISEMENT METHOD, PACKET FORWARDING METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574319
PATH AWARENESS METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574344
SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING MESSAGE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION SERVICE USING MESSAGE STANDBY STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 438 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month