Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/387,300

SENSING DATA REPORTING

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 06, 2023
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — CN 202210204843.8 +1 more
Examiner
HUANG, WEN WU
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
597 granted / 819 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
852
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
86.4%
+46.4% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 819 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 11-13, and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over GUO (US20240251278A1) in view of JANG (US20220322199A1). Regarding claim 1, GUO teaches a sensing data reporting method, comprising: receiving sensing data request information from a control network element, the sensing data request information including sensing data reporting information of target sensing data to be reported to a target network element (GUO teaches a terminal device receiving a "second sensing instruction" (sensing data request information) that originates from a first core network element, such as a sensing control network element. This instruction indicates that the terminal device is to perform a sensing operation related to a "target sensing task" and contains information regarding a second core network element (the target network element) to which the data should be reported, para. 0059-64); generating, by processing circuitry of a terminal device, the target sensing data according to the sensing data reporting information included in the sensing data request information (GUO discloses that the apparatus (terminal device) includes a processor (processing circuitry). After receiving the second sensing instruction, the terminal device performs a sensing operation related to the target sensing task according to the instruction so as to obtain (generate) corresponding sensing data, para. 0059-64); establishing, based on the sensing data request information, a communication session according to address information of the target network element to which the target sensing data is to be reported over a period of time (GUO teaches reporting data through a "user plane mode," which involves establishing communication to send a data packet to the target network element based on its address information (e.g., an IP address parsed from a network element ID or domain name, para. 0065-69); and reporting the target sensing data to the target network element via the communication session (GUO teaches that the terminal device reports the obtained sensing data to the second core network element (target network element). Specifically, it reports the sensing data in a user plane mode, which includes sending a data packet carrying the sensing data to the second core network element, para. 0059-69). GUO is silent to teaching that wherein the address information being included in a user equipment route selection policy received from the control network element when the communication session between the terminal device and the target network element is not established. In the same field of endeavor, JANG teaches a method wherein the address information being included in a user equipment route selection policy received from the control network element when the communication session between the terminal device and the target network element is not established (JANG teaches receiving a User Equipment Route Selection Policy (URSP) rule from a Policy Control Function (PCF) via an Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF). JANG teaches obtaining a URSP rule that includes a traffic descriptor with an IP address and requesting the establishment of a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) session corresponding to the route selection descriptor, fig. 5, 7, para. 0129-135, sensing information, para. 0059). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of GUO with the teaching of JANG in order to improve wireless service and meet the demand for wireless service (see JANG, para. 0003-5). Regarding claim 2, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 1, wherein the user equipment route selection policy includes a sensing data parameter in a traffic descriptor parameter (JANG, para. 0129, fig. 7, 702). Regarding claim 3, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 1, wherein the establishing comprises: establishing the communication session according to one of the address information and virtual address information of the target network element included in the user equipment route selection policy, wherein the communication session is an IP type session when the one of the address information and the virtual address information is included in an IP descriptor of the user equipment route selection policy, and an Ethernet type session when the one of the address information and the virtual address information is included in a non-IP descriptor of the user equipment route selection policy (JANG teaches URSP rules containing IP and non-IP descriptors, para. 0129, fig. 7, 702). Regarding claim 6, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 1, wherein the reporting the target sensing data comprises: encapsulating the target sensing data into a data packet according to the user equipment route selection policy; and transmitting the data packet to the target network element via the communication session (GUO teaches encapsulating target sensing data into a data packet via user plane mode). Regarding claim 11, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 1, further comprising: transmitting the target sensing data to the target network element via the communication session when the communication session between the terminal device and the target network element is established (GUO, fig. 7, 708). Regarding claim 12, GUO teaches an information generation method performed by a control network element, the method comprising: generating sensing data request information, the sensing data request information including sensing data reporting information of target sensing data to be reported by a terminal device to a target network element over a period of time (GUO, fig. 7,700-706, teaches that the terminal device is to perform a sensing operation related to a "target sensing task" and contains information regarding a second core network element (the target network element) to which the data should be reported, para. 0059-64); generating a user plane, the user plane including address information of the target network element to which the terminal device is to establish a communication session for the target sensing data to be reported (GUO discloses that the apparatus (terminal device) includes a processor (processing circuitry). After receiving the second sensing instruction, the terminal device performs a sensing operation related to the target sensing task according to the instruction so as to obtain (generate) corresponding sensing data, para. 0059-64, fig. 7,708); and transmitting, by the control network element, the sensing data request information to the terminal device (GUO, fig. 7,700-706). GUO is silent to teaching that comprising generating a user equipment route selection policy, the user equipment route selection policy including address information of the target network element to which the terminal device is to establish a communication session for the target data to be reported; and transmitting the user equipment route selection policy. In the same field of endeavor, JANG teaches a method comprising generating a user equipment route selection policy, the user equipment route selection policy including address information of the target network element to which the terminal device is to establish a communication session for the target data to be reported; and transmitting the user equipment route selection policy (JANG teaches receiving a User Equipment Route Selection Policy (URSP) rule from a Policy Control Function (PCF) via an Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF). JANG teaches obtaining a URSP rule that includes a traffic descriptor with an IP address and requesting the establishment of a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) session corresponding to the route selection descriptor, fig. 5, 7, para. 0129-135). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of GUO with the teaching of JANG in order to improve wireless service and meet the demand for wireless service (see JANG, para. 0003-5). Regarding claim 13, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the information generation method according to claim 12, wherein the generating the user equipment route selection policy comprises: adding a sensing data parameter to a traffic descriptor parameter of a preset user equipment route selection policy (JANG, para. 0059, sensing information), and writing the address information of the target network element to the traffic descriptor parameter (JANG, para. 0107). Regarding claim 17, GUO teaches a sensing data reporting apparatus, comprising: processing circuitry configured to: receive sensing data request information from a control network element, the sensing data request information including sensing data reporting information of target sensing data to be reported to a target network element (GUO teaches a terminal device receiving a "second sensing instruction" (sensing data request information) that originates from a first core network element, such as a sensing control network element. This instruction indicates that the terminal device is to perform a sensing operation related to a "target sensing task" and contains information regarding a second core network element (the target network element) to which the data should be reported, para. 0059-64); generate the target sensing data according to the sensing data reporting information included in the sensing data request information (GUO discloses that the apparatus (terminal device) includes a processor (processing circuitry). After receiving the second sensing instruction, the terminal device performs a sensing operation related to the target sensing task according to the instruction so as to obtain (generate) corresponding sensing data, para. 0059-64); establish, based on the sensing data request information, a communication session according to address information of the target network element to which the target sensing data is to be reported over a period of time (GUO teaches reporting data through a "user plane mode," which involves establishing communication to send a data packet to the target network element based on its address information (e.g., an IP address parsed from a network element ID or domain name, para. 0065-69); and report the target sensing data to the target network element via the communication session (GUO teaches that the terminal device reports the obtained sensing data to the second core network element (target network element). Specifically, it reports the sensing data in a user plane mode, which includes sending a data packet carrying the sensing data to the second core network element, para. 0059-69). GUO is silent to teaching that wherein the address information being included in a user equipment route selection policy received from the control network element when the communication session between the terminal device and the target network element is not established. In the same field of endeavor, JANG teaches a method wherein the address information being included in a user equipment route selection policy received from the control network element when the communication session between the terminal device and the target network element is not established (JANG teaches receiving a User Equipment Route Selection Policy (URSP) rule from a Policy Control Function (PCF) via an Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF). JANG teaches obtaining a URSP rule that includes a traffic descriptor with an IP address and requesting the establishment of a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) session corresponding to the route selection descriptor, fig. 5, 7, para. 0129-135, sensing information, para. 0059). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of GUO with the teaching of JANG in order to improve wireless service and meet the demand for wireless service (see JANG, para. 0003-5). Regarding claims 18 and 19, the dependent claims are interpreted and rejected for the same reasons as set forth above in claims 2 and 3, respectively. Claim(s) 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14-16 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over GUO and JANG as applied to claims 1 and 12 above, and further in view of Di Girolamo et al. (US. Pub. No. 2022/0022029 A1; hereinafter “Di Girolamo”) Regarding claim 4, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 1. The combination of GUO and JANG is silent to teaching that comprising: transmitting first sensing capability identification information to the control network element when the terminal device has a self-sensing capability. In the same field of endeavor, Di Girolamo teaches a method comprising transmitting first sensing capability identification information to the control network element when the terminal device has a self-sensing capability (see Di Girolamo, fig. 5, para. [0147]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of GUO and JANG with the teaching of Di Girolamo in order to fully utilize UE capabilities and improve utilization of UE (see Di Girolamo, para. [0002-3]). Regarding claim 5, the combination of GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 4, further comprising: displaying a prompt interface, wherein the prompt interface includes a prompt area and a selection area, and the prompt area being configured to query whether sensing data uploading is allowed (see Di Girolamo, fig. 14, para. [0313]); and transmitting the first sensing capability identification information to the control network element in response to a selection operation to allow the sensing data reporting being received via the selection area (see Di Girolamo, fig. 5, steps 1-3, para. [0158-160]). Regarding claims 14 and 15, the dependent claims are interpreted and rejected for the same reasons as set forth above in claims 4 and 5, respectively. Regarding claim 7, the combination of GUO and JANG teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 1. The combination of GUO and JANG is silent to teaching that wherein the sensing data reporting information includes at least one of a sensing data type, a reporting frequency of the target sensing data, a maximum number of reporting times of the target sensing data, a reporting start time of the target sensing data, a reporting end time of the target sensing data, or a reporting start condition of the target sensing data. In the same field of endeavor, Di Girolamo teaches a method wherein the sensing data reporting information includes at least one of a sensing data type, a reporting frequency of the target sensing data, a maximum number of reporting times of the target sensing data, a reporting start time of the target sensing data, a reporting end time of the target sensing data, or a reporting start condition of the target sensing data (see Di Girolamo, fig. 8, 812, para. [0097], report mode, periodic/aperiodic, reporting time). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of GUO and JANG with the teaching of Di Girolamo in order to fully utilize UE capabilities and improve utilization of UE (see Di Girolamo, para. [0002-3]). Regarding claim 9, the combination of GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 7, wherein the sensing data reporting information includes the sensing data type and the sensing data type includes ambient event data; and the generating the target sensing data includes generating the target sensing data when the terminal device detects the ambient event data (see Di Girolamo, fig. 8, 812, para. [0097], report mode, periodic/aperiodic, reporting time). Regarding claim 10, the combination of GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 7, wherein the sensing data reporting information includes the reporting frequency of the sensing data; and the generating the target sensing data includes generating the target sensing data according to the reporting frequency of the sensing data (see Di Girolamo, fig. 8, 812, para. [0097], report mode, periodic/aperiodic, reporting time). Regarding claims 16 and 20, the dependent claims are interpreted and rejected for the same reasons as set forth above in claim 7. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo as applied to claim 7 above, and further in view of Ryden et al. (US. Pub. No. 2020/0120479A1; hereinafter "Ryden"). Regarding claim 8, the combination of GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo teaches the sensing data reporting method according to claim 7. The combination of GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo is silent to teaching that wherein the sensing data reporting information includes the reporting start condition of the target sensing data, and the reporting start condition of the sensing data includes a preset threshold; and the generating the target sensing data includes generating the target sensing data when the terminal device detects that self-sensing data exceeds the preset threshold. In the same field of endeavor, Ryden teaches a method wherein the sensing data reporting information includes the reporting start condition of the target sensing data, and the reporting start condition of the sensing data includes a preset threshold (see Ryden, para. [0091,105,110]); and the generating the target sensing data includes generating the target sensing data when the terminal device detects that self-sensing data exceeds the preset threshold (see Ryden, fig. 7, 708,710). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of GUO, JANG and Di Girolamo with the teaching of Ryden in order to improve power consumption efficiency and network resource (see Ryden, para. [0013]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. LI (US20210194970A1), WU (US20250142300A1), and FU (US20230217347A1) teaches wireless communication systems. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WEN WU HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-7852. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WEN W HUANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684634
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENTERPRISE-CONTROLLED FLEET WIRELESS PERIPHERAL PAIRING
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677124
EXCHANGE OF RANGING DATA
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676402
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING ANTENNA
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665362
Device Configuration Based On Detected User
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659851
RELAY NETWORK DEVICE FOR TRANSITIONING BETWEEN ENERGY STATES OF A NETWORK DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+15.7%)
3y 2m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 819 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month