Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/387,451

LATCH WITH SECONDARY POSITION DETERMINED BY CINCH LEVER AND SUPPORTED BY PRIMARY PAWL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 06, 2023
Priority
Nov 07, 2022 — provisional 63/423,499 +2 more
Examiner
LUGO, CARLOS
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Magna Closures Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
952 granted / 1271 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1306
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1271 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to applicant’s RCE filed on 5/18/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15, 17, 18, 20, 23-28, 30, 31 and 33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pat Application Publication No 20220034129 to Im et al (Im) in view of US Pat Application Publication No 20200095809 to Yong. PNG media_image1.png 429 417 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claims 15, 18 and 23, Im discloses a method of controlling the power latch assembly that comprises rotating a power release gear (200) using a motor (100) in a first direction away from a first home position (start) to release the power latch assembly. The motor is adapted to cinch a ratchet (500) to an overtravel position (fig 5c). The method also requires ceasing rotation of the power release gear in the first direction following the reaching of the second home position (end). Then, rotating the power release gear using the motor in a second direction away from the second home position to cinch the power latch assembly; and ceasing rotation of the power release gear in the second direction following the power release gear reaching the first home position. Im fails to disclose that the assembly comprises hard stop surfaces to stop the assembly in the home positions. PNG media_image2.png 501 1362 media_image2.png Greyscale Yong teaches that it is well known in the art to provide a hard stop (136, 230, or fig 13) to stop a member at a desired position. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the assembly described by Im with hard stop surfaces, as taught by Yong, in order to stop movement of a member at a desired position. As to claim 17, Im discloses that the ceasing rotation of the power release gear (200) does not occur between the first home position and the second home position (since it occurs when it reaches either position). As to claim 20, Im discloses a power latch assembly for a motor vehicle that comprises a ratchet (500); a pawl (600); a cinch mechanism (400); and a single motor (100). The single motor is adapted to actuate the pawl to release the ratchet during a power release cycle, and actuate the ratchet to an overtravel position “prior to the pawl moving to the ratchet releasing position” to soft open the ratchet during power soft opening cycle. Yong teaches that is well known in the art to provide a hard stop (136, 230, or fig 13) to stop a member at a desired position. As to claim 24, Im discloses that the power release gear (200) can move from the home position in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction to move the ratchet from the primary striker capture position to the striker release position. As to claim 25, Im discloses that the power release gear (200) can move from the home position in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction to move the ratchet from the secondary striker capture position to the primary striker capture position. As to claim 26, Im discloses that a sensor (520) is not provided to detect the home position of the power release gear (520 detects the half latch position). As to claim 27, Im discloses that the power release gear (200) has two home positions (first one when it starts and second when it finishes). As to claim 28, Im discloses that each home position are determined in response to stall condition of the actuator (fig 11a, 11b). As to claim 30, Im discloses that the cinch mechanism is adapted to resist the rotation of the ratchet towards a striker release position subsequent the moving the pawl to the ratchet releasing position. As to claim 31, Im discloses that the power release actuator comprises a single motor (100) for controlling the cinch mechanism and the power release gear. As to claim 33, Im discloses that the cinch mechanism comprises a cinch lever (54), wherein with the cinch lever in engagement with the ratchet, the cinch lever is in alignment with the pawl in the ratchet holding position. Claim(s) 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pat Application Publication No 20220034129 to Im et al (Im) in view of US Pat Application Publication No 20200095809 to Yong and further in view of US Pat Application Publication No 20220298834 to Distefano. Im, as modified by Yong, fails to disclose that the power latch assembly is adapted to be supported at one of an upper lintel or rocker panel of the motor vehicle for engaging with a striker positioned at respectively the top or bottom of a closure panel. Im discloses that is used for a passenger door. Distefano teaches that it is well known in the art to provide a power latch assembly with a cinch mechanism used on a passenger door or an upper lintel or rocker panel of the motor vehicle for engaging with a striker positioned at respectively the top or bottom of a closure panel (passenger doors, rear trunk, hood, etc., para 56). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the power latch assembly described by Im, as modified by Yong, on an upper lintel or rocker panel of the motor vehicle for engaging with a striker positioned at respectively the top or bottom of a closure panel, as taught by Distefano, in order to be capable of securing any desired panel of the vehicle. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 6-9, 11-14, 21, and 22 are allowed. Claim 29 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments The current amendment overcomes the previous claim objection and 112 2nd paragraph issues. With respect to the prior art rejection to claim 1, the amendment, adding the allowable subject matter of claim 5, overcome the previous rejection. With respect to claims 15, 17, 18 and 20 and new claims 23-33, in view of the current amendment, a new rejection has been made on the record. Therefore, applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS LUGO whose telephone number is (571)272-7058. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at (571)272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Carlos Lugo/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3675 July 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704004
Arrester Component for a Door Operation Assembly
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703999
DOOR LOCK
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704155
TORQUE-LIMITING SPINDLE
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698648
DOOR LOCK MODULE FOR AN INTERIOR AIRCRAFT DOOR AND AIRCRAFT DOOR LOCK WITH DRIVE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12686255
PRESSURE LEVER LOCK
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.0%)
3y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1271 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month