Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/388,265

IMPORT PROCESS IN A SOFTWARE PACKAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Priority
Nov 10, 2022 — provisional 63/424,481
Examiner
KENDALL, CHUCK O
Art Unit
2192
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Infor (Us) LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
808 granted / 930 resolved
+31.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
950
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§103
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§102
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 930 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This in response to application filed 11/27/24. Claims 1 – 20 have been examined and are pending. Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. Regarding Step 1: Claims 1 – 20 are directed to a method and recites steps of: (a) receiving, by a computing device, a selection of a package and of a target tenant environment into which the package is to be imported, the target tenant environment being one of a plurality of tenant environments in a multi-tenant networked system, the package including customization data for a plurality of applications; (b) and generating, by the computing device, a comparison report indicating corresponding data items of the customization data in the package that are different from data of the target tenant environment. Regarding Step 2A Prong 1: Steps (a), and (b) are mental/abstract processes (i.e. receiving/ generating) which can be performed in the human mind or by a human by using pen and paper). Regarding Step 2A Prong 2: Claim 1 recites elements, i.e. receiving, by a computing device, a selection of a package and of a target tenant environment into which the package is to be imported, the target tenant environment being one of a plurality of tenant environments and generating, by the computing device, a comparison report indicating corresponding data items of the customization. These steps are merely recited at a high level of generality. Thus, the claims as a whole do not integrate the exception into a practical application. Regarding Step 2B: The identified additional elements do not amount significantly more than the judicial exception. The same analysis applies here in 2B, i.e., receiving and generating does not integrate a judicial exception into a practical application. Therefore, claims are ineligible. Correspondence Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Chuck Kendall whose telephone number is 571-272-3698. The examiner can normally be reached on 10:00 am - 6:30pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hyung Sough can be reached on 571-272-6799. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only [0060 – 0080]. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /CHUCK O KENDALL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2192
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Oct 07, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101
Apr 08, 2026
Notice of Allowance
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730623
EXECUTION OF MEASURE COMMAND FOR FIRMWARE UPDATE AND FIRMWARE UPDATE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724607
AUTOMATED CODE DOCUMENTATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724598
PREDICTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR AND AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT OF NETWORK POLICY GENERATION FOR EDGE INFRASTRUCTURE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12705040
UPGRADING AN EXISTING STANDARD ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGER FROM GRID TO VEHICLE (V1G) TO V1G PLUS VEHICLE TO GRID (V2G) OPERATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705043
VEHICLE SOFTWARE DEPLOYMENT SERVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 11m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 930 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month