Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/390,580

MATERIAL TESTING MACHINE AND FIXING MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Examiner
FRANK, RODNEY T
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shimadzu Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
663 granted / 913 resolved
+4.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
936
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 913 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “the other side” in claims 1 and 6 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “the other side” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The claim mentions one side and another side. It’s not quite clear which side the other side is referring to. Since claim 1 contains indefinite language, then claims 2-5, which depend from claim 1, contain indefinite language as well. Claims 1 and 6 recites the limitation "the other side" in the ninth line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Since claim 1 lacks adequate antecedent basis, then claims 2-5, which depend from claim 1, lack antecedent basis as well. The term “substantially” in claims 2, 3, is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “substantially” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. It’s not clear quite what the metes and bounds of substantially would actually be. Conclusion The present rejection does not contain a prior art rejection, but that is in not meant as an indication of any allowable subject matter in the present application. The current 35 USC 112 issues in the claims actually present an issue with performing an adequate and proper search of the claims in relation to the prior art as it is difficult at this time to determine precisely what the invention is truly doing and how. Should the applicant amend the claims to resolve these issues, then a new search will be conducted and if at that time similar prior art is found and a prior art rejection is made, then that rejection can be made final if the rejection is deemed to be made in view of the newly amended claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY T FRANK whose telephone number is (571)272-2193. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at (571) 272-2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RODNEY T. FRANK Examiner Art Unit 2855 /PETER J MACCHIAROLO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2855 January 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590944
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING KETOSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584936
PIPETTING UNIT WITH CAPACITIVE LIQUID DETECTION, COMBINATION OF SUCH A PIPETTING UNIT AND A PIPETTING TIP, AND METHOD FOR CAPACITIVELY DETECTING PIPETTING LIQUID
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584839
POINT-OF-USE DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF SAMPLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584776
PROCESS MONITORING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584891
GAS CHROMATOGRAPH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+3.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 913 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month