Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/390,718

PORTABLE CHARGER DEVICE FOR TELEHANDLER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Examiner
ORTIZ, ELIM
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Manitou Italia S R L
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 567 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
593
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 567 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/29/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 6-7, filed 12/29/2025, with respect to Allowable subject and Claim Rejections under 35 U.S.C.§103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4- 15 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16, 17 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iotti (US 2020/0031643) in view of Vahedi (US 2020/0070672). Regarding claim 16, the combination teaches a telehandler equipped with at least one electric propulsion motor and a plurality of containment compartments designed for receiving power supply means, the telehandler comprising a high voltage electrical system which connects the at least one electric propulsion motor and which includes an on-board electrical charger designed to charge a battery on the telehandler by a connection to a national electricity network; wherein the battery is provided for powering said motor, designed to be received in one of said containment compartments; and However, Iotti does not disclose wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging the battery for telehandlers, designed to be received in a removable fashion in one of said containment compartments Yet, Vahedi in the same filed teaches wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging the battery for telehandlers, designed to be received in a removable fashion in one of said containment compartments (see Fig. 12 and 14B) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Iotti with the teachings of Vahedi by having wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging the battery for telehandlers, designed to be received in a removable fashion in one of said containment compartments in order to benefit of enhanced safety, preventing potential damage to the battery and charger from external factors allowing for flexible, on-the-go power management, giving the user the option to leave the main vehicle battery undisturbed while using the portable charger for other devices, or to power the vehicle with its own separate battery and ensuring that if one power source has an issue, the other can still provide power, and it can also allow for charging multiple devices at once. Regarding claim 17, Iotti teaches a telehandler (see 1) equipped with at least one electric propulsion motor and a plurality of seats (see electric motor 4, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49) designed for receiving power supply means (see power from battery pack 7, para 0060); wherein at least one electric battery is provided for powering said motor (see 8, para 0048-0050), designed to be received in one of said seats (see battery pack 7); and wherein the plurality of seats are directly accessible from the outside (see 100, Fig. 2). However, Iotti does not disclose wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging electric batteries for telehandlers, designed to be inserted in, housed in and extracted in a removable fashion in one of said seats separate from said seat being occupied by the at least one electric battery Yet, Vahedi in the same filed teaches wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging electric batteries for telehandlers, designed to be inserted in, housed in and extracted in a removable fashion in one of said seats separate from said seat being occupied by the at least one electric battery (see Fig. 12 and 14B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Iotti with the teachings of Vahedi by having wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging electric batteries for telehandlers, designed to be inserted in, housed in and extracted in a removable fashion in one of said seats separate from said seat being occupied by the at least one electric battery Regarding claim 18, Iotti teaches a telehandler (see 1) equipped with at least one electric propulsion motor and a plurality of seats designed for receiving power supply means (see electric motor 4, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49); wherein at least one electric battery is provided for powering said motor (see power from battery pack 7, para 0060), designed to be received in one of said seats (see battery pack 7); and wherein the portable battery charger device is designed to be placed on the ground on another support (see power from battery pack 7, para 0060), the portable battery charger is designed to charge the battery both when it is located in one of the seats of the telehandler and when it is placed on the ground or on the another support see battery pack 7). However, Iotti does not disclose wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging electric batteries for telehandlers, designed to be inserted in, housed in and extracted in a removable fashion in one of said seats separate from said seat being occupied by the at least one electric battery. Yet, Vahedi in the same filed teaches wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging electric batteries for telehandlers, designed to be inserted in, housed in and extracted in a removable fashion in one of said seats separate from said seat being occupied by the at least one electric battery (see Fig. 12 and 14B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Iotti with the teachings of Vahedi by having wherein at least one portable battery charger device is provided for charging electric batteries for telehandlers, designed to be inserted in, housed in and extracted in a removable fashion in one of said seats separate from said seat being occupied by the at least one electric battery in order to benefit of enhanced safety, preventing potential damage to the battery and charger from external factors allowing for flexible, on-the-go power management, giving the user the option to leave the main vehicle battery undisturbed while using the portable charger for other devices, or to power the vehicle with its own separate battery and ensuring that if one power source has an issue, the other can still provide power, and it can also allow for charging multiple devices at once. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIM ORTIZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7114. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached on (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIM ORTIZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 30, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603492
PROTECTION CIRCUIT MODULE AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597805
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583343
TRAILER VEHICLE HAVING AN ELECTRIC DRIVE AND COMBINATION INCLUDING THE TRAILER VEHICLE, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE TRAILER VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588293
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION CIRCUIT USING GAN-BASED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576749
BATTERY CONTROL WITH DUAL BROADCAST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month