Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/391,397

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Priority
May 26, 2023 — TW 112119700
Examiner
VO, TUNG T
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
AUO Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
643 granted / 906 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
934
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
66.7%
+26.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 906 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 05/04/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ma et al. (US 20210306612 A1) in view of Sun et al. (US 20210400253 A1) and Park (US 20220377916 A1). Regarding claim 1, Ma teaches a three-dimensional display device (figs. 9 and 10), comprising: a base (4 of fig. 9, [0099 and 0101]); a rotating table (5 and 6 of fig. 9, [0099, 0101, and 0102]), rotatably connected to the base; and at least one display panel disposed on the rotating table (8 and 9 of fig. 9, [0102]); a circuit assembly (5-7 of fig. 9), wherein the rotating table (6 of fig. 9) has an upper surface and a lower surface opposite to each other, the at least one transparent display panel is disposed on the upper surface (9 of fig. 9), the circuit assembly is disposed on the lower surface (5 of fig. 9), and the circuit assembly is located between the base (4 of fig. 9) and the at least one transparent display panel (9 of fig. 9; [0087], [0099] to [0102]); wherein the circuit assembly comprises at least one driving circuit board (5 of fig. 9, [0087]). It is noted that Ma is silent about at least one transparent double-sided display panel having a first display surface and a second display surface opposite to each other. Sun teaches at least one transparent double-sided display panel having a first display surface and a second display surface opposite to each other (5, 501, 502, and 503 of fig. 2, [0025-0026]). Taking the teachings of Ma and Sun together as a whole, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the transparent display of Sun into the display of Sun to provide the side surface is configured as a display surface, the number of voxels generated by the display assembly may be significantly increased, promoting an improvement of the display effect ([0031] of Sun). It is further noted that Ma and Sun do not teach as each of the at least one driving circuit board approaches the rotation axis, a width of a board body of the driving circuit board correspondingly decreases as shown in figure below. PNG media_image1.png 130 324 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 477 545 media_image2.png Greyscale Park teaches, figure 10, each of the at least one driving circuit board (410, 420, and 430 of fig. 10, [0085] FIGS. 4 and 5 show the first panel 310 of the first light source module 300 as an example, and the same may apply to the other panels 320 and 330. Further, the same may apply to the second panels 410, 420, and 430 of the second light source module 400. That is, the second panels 410, 420, and 430 of the second light source module 400 may also have the same structure as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5; [0086] a printed circuit board, 310 of fig. 4) approaches the rotation axis (C’ of fig. 10), a width of a board body of the driving circuit board correspondingly decreases (410, 420, and 430, C’ of fig. 10; the width at the end of the panel 410 to the center C’ decreases). Taking the teachings of Ma, Sun, and Park together as a whole, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the decreased width of the panel to the center of Park for the circuit board of Ma in view of Sun to produce the driving circuit board with the decreased width to the center axis to reduce the influence of high-speed rotation of the rotary portion. Regarding claim 2, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 1, Sun wherein the first display surface and the second display surface of each of the at least one transparent double-sided display panel have different display images at a same point of time ([0032] at least three display surfaces and each display surface has a plurality of plane pixels, more voxels may be generated per unit time, increasing a number of frames of three dimensional images displayed per unit time, and promoting an enhancement of the display effect; 5 and 54 of fig. 5, each display panel surface for displaying the two-dimensional images of different sectional surfaces of a three-dimensional object, 54 of fig. 4, see figure 9 a timing diagram of processing three dimensional image data and figure 10 for determining a frame of two dimensional sub-image data of each display sub-unit 54 of the display panel 5 according to the Nth frame of three dimensional sub-image data and the (N−1)th frame of two dimensional sub-image data to be displayed for each display sub-unit 54 of each display panel 5 is determined by the first control unit 41). Regarding claim 3, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 2, Sun further teaches wherein a distance between the first display surface and the second display surface is greater than 0, and at the same point of time, the display image of the first display surface and the display image of the second display surface are two-dimensional images of different sectional surfaces of a three-dimensional object (501 and 503 of fig. 2 and 3, [0026 and 0034], 54 of figs. 8 and 9). Regarding claim 4, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 1, Ma further teaches a circuit assembly, wherein the rotating table has an upper surface and a lower surface opposite to each other, the at least one transparent double-sided display panel is disposed on the upper surface, the circuit assembly is disposed on the lower surface, and the circuit assembly is located between the base and the at least one transparent double-sided display panel (4-9 of fig. 9, [0099 and 0102]). Regarding claim 5, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 4, Ma further teaches wherein the circuit assembly comprises at least one driving circuit board, a motor and at least one battery, the motor and the at least one battery are electrically connected to the at least one driving circuit board, and the motor drives the rotating table to rotate ([0015 and 0097] an electric-power supplying assembly may employ a wired electric-power supplying mode so the electric-power supplying assembly would obviously encompass at least one battery that is well known in the art. To support the well-known battery, see Shao et al. (US 20220377314 A1), [0117]). Regarding claim 6, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 5, Ma further teaches wherein the circuit assembly further comprises a wireless charging coil, and the wireless charging coil is disposed on the base and corresponds to the at least one battery to perform wireless charging to the at least one battery (2-4 of fig. 9, [0099-0101]). Regarding claim 8, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 1, Ma further teaches a transparent cover, wherein the transparent cover and the base are hermetically combined to form an accommodating space, and the rotating table and the at least one transparent double-sided display panel are located in the accommodating space (10 of fig. 9, [0022, 0105]). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ma et al. (US 20210306612 A1) in view of Sun et al. (US 20210400253 A1) and Park (US 20220377916 A1) as applied to claim 1, and further in view of Yokota et al. (US 20080111928 A1). Regarding claim 7, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 1. Ma, Sun, and Park do not teach a plurality of ball bearings, wherein the base comprises a plurality of bearing fixing portions, the ball bearings are respectively disposed on the corresponding bearing fixing portions, and the ball bearings are connected between the base and the rotating table. Yokota teaches a plurality of ball bearings, wherein the base comprises a plurality of bearing fixing portions, the ball bearings are respectively disposed on the corresponding bearing fixing portions, and the ball bearings are connected between the base and the rotating table ([0052]). Taking the teachings of Ma, Sun, Park, and Yokota together as a whole, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the bearing balls of Yokota into the base and the rotating table Ma in view of Sun and Park to easily rotate the display panel in 360 degrees. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ma et al. (US 20210306612 A1) in view of Sun et al. (US 20210400253 A1) and Park (US 20220377916 A1) as applied to claim 1, and further in view of Rotzoll et al. (US 20190027534 A1). Regarding claim 9, Ma, Sun, and Park teach the three-dimensional display device according to claim 1, but Ma, Sun, and Park do not teach wherein each of the at least one transparent double-sided display panel has a plurality of through holes. Rotzoll teaches wherein each of the at least one transparent double-sided display panel has a plurality of through holes (30 and 99 of fig. 1, [0052] and [0058] According to some embodiments of the present invention, air can flow through holes 30 in a display substrate 10 to cool micro-iLEDs 22. Holes 30 in an iLED display 99 can improve utilization of various cooling schemes for the associated viewing space as well as the iLED display 99. For example, forcing air in either direction through a display substrate 10 from the rear (a side of the display substrate 10 opposite a viewer of the iLED display 99) would improve cooling of display-related components behind the iLED display 99. Holes 30 can also be used to allow at least some of the air in a room to flow through an iLED display 99, thereby reducing the iLED display 99 impact on existing air conditioning and heating systems in a given room in which the iLED display 99 is placed). Taking the teachings of Ma, Sun, Park, and Rotzoll together as a whole, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the display with holes of Rotzoll into the first side and second side of the combined display of Ma in view of Sun and Park for air passing through the holes that would prevent the decreasing rotation of the display. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 05/04/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that Park does not teach that the second panels 410, 420 and 430 are used as driving PCBs. Therefore, Park, in combination with Ma and Sun, fails to teach or suggest the limitation of "as each of the at least one driving circuit board approaches the rotation axis, a width of a board body of the driving circuit board correspondingly decreases" as recited in claim 1 in the remarks. The examiner strongly disagrees with the applicant. It is submitted that the second panels, 410, 420 and 430 of fig. 10, are used as driving PCBs, [0085] the first panel 310 of the first light source module 300 as an example, and the same may apply to the other panels 320 and 330. Further, the same may apply to the second panels 410, 420, and 430 of the second light source module 400; the second panels 410, 420, and 430 of the second light source module 400 may also have the same structure as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5; [0086] the panel 310 may be a printed circuit board (PCB), the same may apply to the second light panels 410, 420, and 430; [0088] FIG. 5 illustrates the rear surface of the panel 310. Drivers 314 for driving the light-emitting elements 312 may be mounted on the rear surface of the panel 310, which constitutes the light source module; [0089] since the drivers 314 are mounted on the rear surface of the panel 310. This disclosure teaches the driving circuit, 314 of fig. 5, attached to the printed circuit board, 310 of fig. 5, to form the driving circuit board. The same apply to the second panels 410, 420, and 430 as suggested in paragraph [0085]. Park further teaches as each of the at least one driving circuit board approaches the rotation axis (410, 420, and 430 of fig. 4, illustrating the second panel has one end that approaches to the rotation axis), and a width of a board body of the driving circuit board correspondingly decreases (410, 420, and 430 of fig. 10, the second panel has a width decreases at the end at the rotation axis, C’of figure 10). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lu (US 20240036340 A1) discloses a screen for unidirectional beam homogenizing and expanding, which is arranged to expand, along a first direction, beams of light with different angles of emergence emitted by a projection unit into light cones with uniform intensity and same distribution, with propagation direction and angle of divergence unchanged along a second direction, wherein the screen for unidirectional beam homogenizing and expanding comprises a lenticular grating and at least one linear Fresnel lens. LV et al. (US 20240221548 A1) The present disclosure provides a display panel, a driving method thereof and a display device, belongs to the field of display technology, and can at least partially solve the problem that the transmission bandwidth required by the conventional rotational display device is large during the display. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUNG T VO whose telephone number is (571)272-7340. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at 571-272-7527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TUNG T. VO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2425 /TUNG T VO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 05, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684126
POINT CLOUD ENCODING METHOD AND DECODING METHOD, AND ENCODER AND DECODER
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675929
SINGLE 2D DIGITAL IMAGE CAPTURE SYSTEM PROCESSING, DISPLAYING OF 3D DIGITAL IMAGE SEQUENCE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12664787
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATED ONLINE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, MONITORING AND VISUALIZATION
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659502
Video Coding Using Intra Block Copy
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650286
SPIN-STABILIZED STEERABLE PROJECTILE CONTROL
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+15.2%)
3y 5m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 906 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month