Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/392,238

GOLF CLUB HEAD

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Examiner
GORDEN, RAEANN
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Taylor Made Golf Company Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1220 granted / 1469 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1469 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 19-22 include ratios that are not clearly defined in the claims. The last line of the claims includes a D1 ratio range but the ratio is not defined in the claim. The equation as well as the definition for each factor should be included in the claims. Claims 2-4, the acronym CG should be expanded to the full term. Claims 5-7, since delta has an accepted meaning of change, applicant’s definition should be described in the claim. Claim 8, CFY should be expanded and defined. Claims 10-12, I should be expanded to moment of inertia. Claim 13, BP Proj, Up should be defined. Claim 14, Zup should be defined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 9, 14-17, and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Greaney et al. (2021/0146203). Claim 1, Greaney discloses a golf club head comprising a heel portion, a sole portion, a toe portion, a crown portion, a front portion, a rear portion, and a striking face (figures). The front portion of the club having an upper front portion and a lower front portion (fig 9-10). The upper front portion made of a first material and the lower front portion made of a material different from the upper front portion (see fig 10 for different hatch marks indicating different materials). For examining purposes, the top is considered an upper portion and the face includes the lower portion. An aft body having at least a portion of the crown portion and a portion of the sole portion (see figure 10 for sole and crown connection at the aft), the aft body being made of a non-metallic and metallic material [0028]; and a D1z ratio of 5.8 (kg ·mm3)/cm3 [(10mm *525 kg ·mm3)/900 cm3] [0046,0060,0068]. Claim 2, the golf club head has a center of gravity CGX of between -2 mm and 5 mm [0069]. Claim 3, the golf club head has a center of gravity CGZ of between 0 mm and -4 mm [0069]. Claim 5, the golf club head has a Delta1 (distance from hosel axis to the center of gravity) of 10 mm [0060]. Claim 9, the golf club head has a mass between 185 g and 215 g [0025]. Claim 14, the golf club head has a Zup of between 10 mm and 35 mm [0069]. Claim 15, the golf club head has a volume divided by Delta1 no greater than 70 cc/mm [0069]. Claim 16, the golf club head has a volume divided by Zup ratio of at least 25 cc/ mm [0069]. Claim 17, the golf club head has a Zup divided by D1 ratio of between 1.8 to 4 [0069]. Claim 19, Greaney discloses a golf club head comprising a heel portion, a sole portion, a toe portion, a crown portion, a front portion, a rear portion, and a striking face (figures). The front portion of the club having an upper front portion and a lower front portion (fig 9-10). The upper front portion made of a first material and the lower front portion made of a material different from the upper front portion (see fig 10 for different hatch marks indicating different materials). For examining purposes, the top is considered an upper portion and the face includes the lower portion. An aft body having at least a portion of the crown portion and a portion of the sole portion (see figure 10 for sole and crown connection at the aft), the aft body being made of a non-metallic and metallic material [0028]; and a D1y ratio of 4.4 (kg ·mm3)/cm3 [(10mm *400 kg ·mm3)/900 cm3] [0046,0060,0068]. Claim 20, Greaney discloses a golf club head comprising a heel portion, a sole portion, a toe portion, a crown portion, a front portion, a rear portion, and a striking face (figures). The front portion of the club having an upper front portion and a lower front portion (fig 9-10). The upper front portion made of a first material and the lower front portion made of a material different from the upper front portion (see fig 10 for different hatch marks indicating different materials). For examining purposes, the top is considered an upper portion and the face includes the lower portion. An aft body having at least a portion of the crown portion and a portion of the sole portion (see figure 10 for sole and crown connection at the aft), the aft body being made of a non-metallic and metallic material [0028]; and a D1x ratio of 5.8 (kg ·mm3)/cm3 [(10mm *300 kg ·mm3)/900 cm3] [0046,0060,0068]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Greaney et al. (2021/0146203) in view of Johnson et al. (2018/0185719). Greaney discloses a CFY or distance from the center to the shaft axis as shown in figure 7, which is identical to applicant’s figure 7. However, the value is not disclosed. Johnson teaches a club head with a CFY or distance from the center to the shaft axis of 14.5 (table 1). One of ordinary skill in the art would modify the value for the desired control of the head during use. Claim(s) 21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Greaney et al. (2021/0146203). Claim 21, Greaney discloses a golf club head comprising a heel portion, a sole portion, a toe portion, a crown portion, a front portion, a rear portion, and a striking face (figures). The front portion of the club having an upper front portion and a lower front portion (fig 9-10). The upper front portion made of a first material and the lower front portion made of a material different from the upper front portion (see fig 10 for different hatch marks indicating different materials). For examining purposes, the top is considered an upper portion and the face includes the lower portion. An aft body having at least a portion of the crown portion and a portion of the sole portion (see figure 10 for sole and crown connection at the aft), the aft body being made of a non-metallic and metallic material [0028]; and a D1xz ratio of 1750 (kg2 ·mm5)/cm3 [(10mm *300 kg ·mm3 * 525kg ·mm3 /900 cm3] [0046,0060,0068]. Decreasing the value is within the capabilities of one skilled in the art for the desired performance. "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Claim 22, Greaney discloses a golf club head comprising a heel portion, a sole portion, a toe portion, a crown portion, a front portion, a rear portion, and a striking face (figures). The front portion of the club having an upper front portion and a lower front portion (fig 9-10). The upper front portion made of a first material and the lower front portion made of a material different from the upper front portion (see fig 10 for different hatch marks indicating different materials). For examining purposes, the top is considered an upper portion and the face includes the lower portion. An aft body having at least a portion of the crown portion and a portion of the sole portion (see figure 10 for sole and crown connection at the aft), the aft body being made of a non-metallic and metallic material [0028]; and a D1xyz ratio of 700,000 (kg3 ·mm7)/cm3 [(10mm *300 kg ·mm3 * 400kg ·mm3 * 525kg ·mm3 /900 cm3] [0046,0060,0068]. Decreasing the value is within the capabilities of one skilled in the artfor the desired performance. "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAEANN GORDEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4409. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at 571-272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAEANN GORDEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711 January 9, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599819
GOLF CLUB HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594464
GOLF BALLS HAVING AT LEAST ONE RADAR DETECTABLE MARK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594465
GOLF BALLS HAVING INCREASED IMPACT DURABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582876
GOLF BALL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576314
GOLF CLUB HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-5.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month