Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/392,488

3D OPTICAL SENSOR ALIGNMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Examiner
LU, TOM Y
Art Unit
2667
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cepton Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
826 granted / 941 resolved
+25.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
964
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
§103
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 941 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/02/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 5-6, 8-11, 14-16, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cullumber et al (“Cullumber” hereinafter, U.S. Publication No. 2020/0241113 A1). As per claim 1, Cullumber discloses a system for aligning a component for lidar (paragraph [0005] & paragraph [0015] and figures 8 & 10 for a method of aligning a LIDAR system) comprising: a platform (figure 8: combination of flexures 822 and platform 820 is the claimed “platform”) arranged for positioning a base (lens mount 830 is the claimed “base”) on the platform; a first device comprising a first stage (actuator 882 is the claimed “first stage”); and a second device comprising a second stage (actuator 884 is the claimed “second stage”), wherein: the first stage is arranged to perform a first translational motion (paragraph [0054]: first actuator 882 is coupled with a controller 890 to move the platform 820 in the direction of “x-axis”); and the second stage is arranged to perform a second translational motion coordinated with the first translational motion (paragraph [0054]: the second actuator 884 is coupled with controller 890 to move the platform 850 in the direction of “y-axis”) to rotate a module (figure 8 & paragraph [0052]: the transceiver array attached platform 850 is the claimed “module”) with respect to the base to align an electro-optical device with respect to the base (paragraph [0052]: positioning the light sources 860, detectors 870 with lens 842 and 844). As per claim 2, Cullumber discloses a first camera characterized by a first optical axis; a second camera characterized by a second optical axis, wherein: the second camera is arranged so that the second optical axis is skew to the first optical axis; and the first camera and the second camera are arranged to acquire images of the module (as shown in figure 7 and paragraph [0050], the transceiver module 600a and 660b are rotated by 180 degrees). As per claim 5, Cullumber discloses wherein: the first device comprises a first tension contact; the second device comprises a second tension contact; and the first tension contact and the second tension contact are arranged to concurrently apply pressure to the module (as shown in figure 8, actuators 882 & 884 are tension contacts are controller by a controller 890 to apply pressure concurrently for a Lissajous scan and cancel any vibration caused by the electric-optical assembly). As per claim 6, Cullumber discloses wherein the second translational motion is arranged to be parallel to and in an opposite direction of the first translational motion (paragraph [0054]: “the motion of the second platform 850 may be substantially opposite to the motion of the first platform 820 at any instant”). As per claim 8, Cullumber discloses wherein the first stage is a linear translation stage (the actuator 882 may perform a linear translation when controlled by the controller 890). As per claim 9, Cullumber discloses wherein the first stage is three-axis motorized linear translation stage (paragraph [0054]: “Lissajous scan pattern” implies the platform 820 may be rotated by the actuator 882 in three-axis). As per claim 10, Cullumber discloses wherein the electro-optical device is arranged on the module to emit or detect light, the first stage and the second stage are arranged to manipulate the module to align the electro-optical device with respect to the base (see figure 8). As per claim 11, see explanation in claim 1. As per claim 14, see figure 8 for module secured and attached to platform 850. As per claim 15, see figures 8 for transceiver array. As per claim 16, see explanation in claim 1, the examiner notes Cullumber’s system is a computer-like system, which inherently includes a memory device. As per claim 18, see explanation in claim 6. As per claim 20, see explanation in claim 8. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4, 7, 12-13, 17 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOM Y LU whose telephone number is (571)272-7393. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Bella can be reached at (571) 272 - 7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOM Y LU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2667
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597133
TRAINING END-TO-END WEAKLY SUPERVISED NETWORKS AT THE SPECIMEN (SUPRA-IMAGE) LEVEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591967
DISPLACEMENT ESTIMATION OF INTERVENTIONAL DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591296
REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION OF EXTENDED REALITY DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573037
LEARNING APPARATUS, LEARNING METHOD, TRAINED MODEL, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564867
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING CONTAINERS WHICH HAVE FALLEN OVER AND/OR ARE DAMAGED IN A CONTAINER MASS FLOW
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 941 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month