Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/393,497

EMITTERS BASED ON OCTAHEDRAL METAL COMPLEXES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Priority
Nov 10, 2014 — provisional 62/077,443 +4 more
Examiner
AULAKH, CHARANJIT
Art Unit
1621
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Arizona Board of Regents
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1422 granted / 1758 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -16% lift
Without
With
+-15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1800
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1758 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . According to paper filed on March 18, 2026, the applicants have canceled claims 23-24 and 36, amended claims 16, 21 and 27 and furthermore, have added new claim 37. Claims 16-22, 26-33 and 37 are pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see paper, filed March 18, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 16-22, 26-33 under written description, indefiniteness and Improper Markush Group have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, all rejections have been withdrawn. NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 5. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 16-22, 26 and 28-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The applicants have amended claims to define the value of variables L1, L3 and L5 as carbene (CH2 group). In independent claim 16 as well as claim 21, there is no written description for preparing and using such metal complexes where variables L1, L3 and L5 represent carbene (CH2 group). 8. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 27 depends upon claim 16. According to amended claim 16, variables L1 and L5 represent diazole or pyrazole groups while variable L3 can also represent pyridine in addition to diazole and pyrazole groups. However, in claim 27, several metal complexes lack antecedent basis for the values of variables L1, L3 and L5 since these variables represent heteroaryl rings containing O, S, P, 3 Nitrogen atoms, bicyclic rings and metal complexes having two phenyl-pyridine rings (see metal complexes on pages 15, 16, 22, 28-30, 35-36, 40-41, 57, 60, 61, 73, 74 and 77). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 37 is allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARANJIT AULAKH whose telephone number is (571)272-0678. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton A Brooks can be reached at 571-270-7682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARANJIT AULAKH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Aug 05, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 20, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636278
HDAC6-INHIBITED HUMAN REGULATORY T CELLS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637464
TETRACYCLIC COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING BRAIN DISORDERS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629337
DAPTOMYCIN FORMULATION
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625144
CHEMOSELECTIVE SENSITIVITY BOOSTER FOR TAGGING A PEPTIDE, PEPTIDE CONJUGATE, OR SIMILAR REACTIVE MOLECULE
4y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624042
COMPOUND FOR TARGETED DEGRADATION OF BTK AND ANTI-TUMOUR USE THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (-15.6%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month