DETAILED ACTION
Status of Claims
Claims 11, 16, 19-20 are amended.
Claims 11-20 are pending.
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/17/2026 has been entered.
Priority
Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application filed in DE 2023200037.7 on 01/03/2023 under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Binder (WO 2017149526) in view of Jakobsen (US 20220060111).
Regarding Claim 11, Binder teaches the following limitations:
A power supply device for a radar sensor, comprising: (Binder – [pg. 116 para. 3] The type of propagated waves used for measuring the distance by the distance meters A 40a and B 40b may be identical, similar, or different from each other. For example, the same technology may be used, such that both distance meters A 40a and B 40b use light waves, acoustic waves, or radar waves for distance measuring. [pg. 118 para. 4] The angle meter 55c comprises the base unit 65 functionalities, and provides shared structures and functionalities for the two distance meters A 40a and 40b, such as a shared mechanical enclosure, a shared power source or a shared power supply, or a shared control. The module or circuit 'A' meter functionality 71a comprises the structure and functionalities that are not shared and are part of the distance measuring along line 51a, namely the emitter 11a driven by the signal conditioner 6a, the sensor 13a which output is manipulated by the signal conditioner 6'a, and the correlator 19a for correlating between the signal fed to the emitter 11a and the signal received from the sensor 13a…The shared components may comprise the control block 61, connected to activate and control the 'A' module 71a and the 'B' module 71b and to receive the measured distance therefrom, the display 63, the user interface block 62, a power source, and an enclosure.)
a voltage supply connection, (Binder – [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 22 para. 4] An advantage of horn antennas is that since they have no resonant elements, they can operate over a wide range of frequencies, a wide bandwidth. The usable bandwidth of horn antennas is typically of the order of 10: 1, and can be up to 20: 1 (for example allowing it to operate from 1 GHz to 20 GHz). The input impedance is slowly varying over this wide frequency range, allowing low voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) over the bandwidth. The gain of horn antennas typically ranges up to 25 dBi, with 10 - 20 dBi being.)
wherein the power supply device is configured to provide a supply voltage for the radar sensor at the voltage supply connection; (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
PNG
media_image1.png
665
512
media_image1.png
Greyscale
an input interface configured to receive a trigger signal from the radar sensor; and (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
a control apparatus configured to temporarily adjust a control for the supply voltage at the voltage supply connection when the trigger signal from the radar sensor has been received at the input interface, (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088] According to examples, the load circuit 1009 is configured to provide in anticipation of a scheduled change of operation of the load circuit at an upcoming instant of time a trigger signal indicating that the scheduled change of operation is upcoming as one of the timing signals. The trigger signal is specific to a type of the scheduled change of operation. The power supply circuit 1003 is configured to adapt the control signal by a predetermined magnitude which is attributed to the trigger signal (or attributed to the type of the scheduled change of operation indicated by the trigger signal) in reaction to receiving the trigger signal.)
wherein the control apparatus includes an error amplifier that performs a comparison of the supply voltage with a reference voltage, the reference voltage being temporarily adjustable based on the trigger signal, wherein the control apparatus outputs a control variable corresponding to the comparison, and wherein the control for the supply voltage is adjusted based on the control variable. (Jakobsen – [Fig. 6], [0088], [0059] The comparator 420 may compare the feedback current signal 418 to the control signal 312. The error amplifier 358 may provide the control signal 312 by comparing the load current at the output terminal 352 to the predetermined supply voltage value provided at the reference voltage terminal 555 of the error amplifier 358. An output 567 of the controlled current source 566 is connected to an input for the control signal 312 of the comparator of 420, such that a current of the control signal 312 comprises current contributions provided by the error amplifier 358 and the controlled current source 567. The controlled current source 566 is controlled by using the indication 364.)
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal, control signal, and error amplifier of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Regarding Claim 12, Binder further teaches:
further comprising: a switching converter configured to convert an input voltage provided at the power supply device into an output voltage and to provide the output voltage as a supply voltage at the voltage supply connection. (Binder – [Fig. 38], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 155 para. 3] An example of an AC-powered arrangement 500c is shown in FIG. 38. The connection to the AC power typically uses an AC plug 508 connected via an AC cord 507. In one example, a power supply 506a, that may be an AC/DC power supply, is used in order to adapt the AC power to the voltage level and type that can be used by the actuator 501.)
PNG
media_image2.png
571
502
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Regarding Claim 13, Binder further teaches:
wherein the control apparatus is configured to increase the supply voltage at the voltage supply connection when the trigger signal from the radar sensor has been received at the input interface. (Binder – [Fig. 38], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088])
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Regarding Claim 14, Binder further teaches:
wherein the control apparatus is configured to increase a control bandwidth of the control for the supply voltage at the voltage supply connection when a trigger signal from the radar sensor has been received at the input interface. (Binder – [Fig. 38], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088])
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Regarding Claim 15, Binder further teaches:
wherein the control apparatus is configured to reset the control bandwidth of the control for the supply voltage at the voltage supply connection after a predetermined period of time after the control bandwidth has been increased. (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 175 para. 6] The signal conditioner may involve time, frequency, or magnitude related manipulations. The signal conditioner may be linear or non-linear, and may include an amplifier, a voltage or current limiter, an attenuator, a delay line or circuit,)
Regarding Claim 16, Binder teaches the following limitations:
A radar system, comprising: (Binder – [Fig. 38], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 22 para. 5] Radar distance measuring system is described in a paper published in Journal of Computers, Vol. 6, No. 4, April 2011 by Zhao Zeng-rong and Bai Ran entitled: "A FMCW Radar Distance Measure System based on LabVIEW which is incorporated in its entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. Automotive radar systems using integrated 24 GHz radar sensor techniques are described in a paper by Michael Klotz and Hermann Rohling published 4/2001 in the Journal of telecommunications and Information Technology entitled: "24 GHz radar sensor for automotive applications", which is incorporated in its entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.)
a radar sensor configured to transmit radar signals, receive radar echoes of the transmitted radar signals, and process the received radar echoes; and (Binder – [pg. 116 para. 3], [pg. 23 para. 3] Electromagnetic radiation is transmitted in the form of transmission pulses at objects, and reflected (or backscattered) echo pulses are detected. Measurements are made by determining the pulse time of flight of the distances of objects which respectively form a distance picture element and at which the transmission pulses are reflected.)
a power supply device for the radar sensor wherein the power supply device being configured to provide a supply voltage for the radar sensor, the power supply device including: (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
a voltage supply connection, (Binder – [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
wherein the power supply device is configured to provide the supply voltage for the radar sensor at the voltage supply connection, (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
an input interface configured to receive a trigger signal from the radar sensor; and (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
a control apparatus configured to temporarily adjust a control for the supply voltage at the voltage supply connection when the trigger signal from the radar sensor has been received at the input interface; (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
wherein the radar sensor is configured to provide the trigger signal at the input interface of the power supply device when a specified operating state is set in the radar sensor, (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088])
wherein the control apparatus includes an error amplifier that performs a comparison of the supply voltage with a reference voltage, the reference voltage being temporarily adjustable based on the trigger signal, wherein the control apparatus outputs a control variable corresponding to the comparison, and wherein the control for the supply voltage is adjusted based on the control variable. (Jakobsen – [Fig. 6], [0059], [0088])
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal, control signal, and error amplifier of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Regarding Claim 17, Binder further teaches:
wherein the radar sensor is configured to transmit sequences of radar signals, (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 175 para. 6])
wherein pauses in which no radar signals are transmitted are provided between the sequences of radar signals, and (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 175 para. 6]
wherein the radar sensor is configured to provide the trigger signal at the input interface of the power supply device in each case prior to the transmission of a sequence of radar signals. (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4], [pg. 175 para. 6])
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088])
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Regarding Claim 18, Binder further teaches:
wherein the radar sensor includes a frequency-modulated continuous wave radar. (Binder – [pg. 22 para. 5])
Regarding Claim 19, Binder teaches the following limitations:
A motor vehicle, comprising: (Binder – [pg. 22 para. 5])
a radar system, including: (Binder – [pg. 22 para. 5])
a radar sensor configured to transmit radar signals, receive radar echoes of the transmitted radar signals, and process the received radar echoes; and (Binder – [pg. 23 para. 3], [pg. 116 para. 3])
a power supply device for the radar sensor wherein the power supply device being configured to provide a supply voltage for the radar sensor, the power supply device including: (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
a voltage supply connection, (Binder – [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
wherein the power supply device is configured to provide the supply voltage for the radar sensor at the voltage supply connection, (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
an input interface configured to receive a trigger signal from the radar sensor; and (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
a control apparatus configured to temporarily adjust a control for the supply voltage at the voltage supply connection when the trigger signal from the radar sensor has been received at the input interface; (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
wherein the radar sensor is configured to provide the trigger signal at the input interface of the power supply device when a specified operating state is set in the radar sensor, (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088])
wherein the control apparatus includes an error amplifier that performs a comparison of the supply voltage with a reference voltage, the reference voltage being temporarily adjustable based on the trigger signal, wherein the control apparatus outputs a control variable corresponding to the comparison, and wherein the control for the supply voltage is adjusted based on the control variable. (Jakobsen – [Fig. 6], [0059], [0088])
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal, control signal, and error amplifier of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Regarding Claim 20, Binder further teaches:
A method for supplying power to a radar sensor, comprising the following steps: (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
providing a supply voltage at the radar sensor; (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4])
receiving a trigger signal from the radar sensor; temporarily adjusting a control for the supply voltage at the radar sensor when a trigger signal from the radar sensor has been received; (Binder – [Fig. 7], [pg. 22 para. 4], [pg. 118 para. 4] Binder does not explicitly teach “trigger signal”.)
Binder does not explicitly teach the following limitations, however Jakobsen, in the same field of endeavor, teaches:
trigger signal (Jakobsen – [0088])
performing a comparison of the supply voltage with a reference voltage, the reference voltage being temporarily adjustable based on the trigger signal, outputting a control variable corresponding to the comparison, and adjusting the control for the supply voltage based on the control variable. (Jakobsen – [Fig. 6], [0059], [0088])
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the control block of Binder with the trigger signal, control signal, and error amplifier of Jakobsen in order schedule a change in operation (Jakobsen – [0088]).
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 6-8, filed 07/17/2026, with respect to the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Applicant's remaining arguments amount to a general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims is understandable and distinguishable from other inventions.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON JAMES HENSON whose telephone number is (703)756-1841. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am - 5:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Resha H. Desai can be reached at (571) 270-7792. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/BRANDON JAMES HENSON/Examiner, Art Unit 3648
/BERNARR E GREGORY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Prosecution Insights