Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/394,715

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A DUAL HOOK FLAT STRAP ATTACHMENT DEVICE AND ACCESSORIES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Examiner
UPCHURCH, DAVID M
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Nite Ize, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
746 granted / 1017 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1048
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§102
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 and 25-26 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hildebrandt U.S. 3,893,210. As for Claim 1, Hildebrandt discloses a slide for securing a flat strap through one of two open ends (open ends of 16) and by folding the flat strap (18) and wedging through an opening (opening of 16), the slide comprising: a body section (body of 60), the body section sized to receive the flat strap; a ridge (64a), the ridge on the body section; a first and second overhang (62a and 62b) on either side of the ridge and opposing the ridge such that the first and second overhang cooperate with the ridge to impart friction to the flat strap and prevent removal, the opening between the first and second overhang (see Fig. 4). 2. The slide of claim 1, wherein the overhangs fold over like an upside-down G-shape in relation to the ridge (see Fig. 4). 3. The slide of claim 2, wherein the overhangs are knobbed (rounded corners of 62a and 62b or rounded edge of 62c). 4. The slide of claim 3, wherein the overhangs and the ridge intersect on an imaginary line (imaginary line running through 62c) running across the device (see Figs. 4-6). 5. The slide of claim 3, wherein a void is included on either side of the ridge, such that the flat strap is foldable down into the void for loading and unloading (see void in 16 disclosed in Figs. 5-6). 6. The slide of claim 5, wherein the ridge is raised in respect to the voids and a bottom edge of the slide (see Figs. 5-6). 7. The slide of claim 6, wherein when two sections of the flat strap are in the slide fiction of the knobbed overhangs and ridge against the flat strap prevent removal (see Fig. 5). 8. The slide of claim 7, wherein as tension is applied to the flat strap, the flat strap tends to flatten, providing force against the first and second overhangs and the ridge which translates to friction against removal (see Fig. 5). 9. The slide of claim 8, further comprising an opening between the first and second overhangs (opening in 16, see Figs. 5-6). 10. The slide of claim 9, wherein the opening is aligned with the ridge (see Figs. 5-6). 11. The slide of claim 10, wherein the flat strap is loadable through the opening by folding the flat strap and sliding edges of the flat strap into the voids on either side of the ridge (see Figs. 5-6). As for Claim 12, Hildebrandt discloses a slide for securing a flat strap, the slide comprising: a body section (body of 16), the body section sized to receive the flat strap by sliding the flat strap through an open end (open end of 16); a ridge (64a), the ridge on the body section; a first and second overhang (62a and 62b), having an opening between them (opening of 16), the opening configured to receive a the flat strap (18) by folding the flat strap and wedging through (see Fig. 1), the first and second overhang on either side of the ridge and opposing the ridge such that the first and second overhang cooperate with the ridge to impart friction to the flat strap and prevent removal, wherein the overhangs fold over like an upside-down G-shape in relation to the ridge and the overhangs are knobbed (see Figs.4-6) . 13. The slide of claim 12, wherein the overhangs and the ridge intersect on an imaginary line (imaginary line running through 62c) running across the device (see Figs.5-6). 14. The slide of claim 12, wherein the overhangs and the ridge extend towards each other nearing an imaginary line running across the device. (see Figs. 5-6) 15. The slide of claim 12, wherein the overhangs and the ridge extend towards each other passing beyond an imaginary line running across the device (see Figs. 5-6). As for Claim 16, a method of using a slide, the method comprising: providing a slide (16), the slide including a body section (body of 16), the body section sized to receive the flat strap (18) by sliding the flat strap through an open end (see Fig. 1); a ridge (64a), the ridge on the body section; a first and second overhang (62a and 62b), having an opening (see opening of 16) between them, the opening configured to receive the flat strap by folding the flat strap and wedging through (see Fig. 1), the first and second over hang on either side of the ridge and opposing the ridge such that the first and second overhang cooperate with the ridge to impart friction to the flat strap and prevent removal, wherein the overhangs fold over like an upside-down G-shape in relation to the ridge and the overhangs are knobbed (see Figs. 4-6); folding a first section of a flat strap (68a, see Fig. 1)); inserting the first section of the flat strap through an opening between the first and second overhangs (see Figs. 1 and 4-6). 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: folding a second section of the flat strap (68); inserting the second section of the flat strap through an opening between the first and second overhangs (see Figs. 1 and 4-6). 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising: pulling of the flat strap; flattening the flat strap as a result of the pulling; providing force against the first and second overhangs and the ridge which translates to friction against removal as a result of the flattening (see Figs. 4-6). 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising: folding the second section of the flat strap; removing second section of the flat strap through the opening (see Figs. 1-2 and 4-6). As for Claim 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising: folding the first section of the flat strap; removing first section of the flat strap through the opening (see Figs. 1-2 and 4-6). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to Applicant’s argument that Hildebrandt does not discloses an additional opening for receiving the flat strap, the recitation appears to by be further limiting than the claim language. Claims 1, 12, and 16 only discloses recites one opening and nor more than one opening. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M UPCHURCH whose telephone number is (571)270-7957. The examiner can normally be reached 6AM-3PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID M UPCHURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 01, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599200
MAGNETIC BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595815
COUPLING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594873
Cable Binder for Vehicles, Cable-Binding Assembly, and Vehicle Lamp with the Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582203
Snap-Thru Grid Fastener For Mesh Fabrics
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577973
COLLAPSIBLE SPACER FOR SETTING GAP BETWEEN ADJACENT PANELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month