Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/394,715

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A DUAL HOOK FLAT STRAP ATTACHMENT DEVICE AND ACCESSORIES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Examiner
UPCHURCH, DAVID M
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Nite Ize Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
762 granted / 1036 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1055
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§102
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1036 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/4/2026 has been entered. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: A slide for securing a flat strap. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5-12, and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ackerman (U.S. 2,986,787). As for Claim 1, Ackermann discloses a slide for securing a flat strap through one of two open ends (see Annotated Fig.) and by folding the flat strap and wedging through an opening, the slide comprising: a body section (see Annotated Fig.), the body section sized to receive the flat strap; a ridge (see Annotated Fig.), the ridge on the body section (see Annotated Fig.); a first and second overhang (see Annotated Fig.) on either side of the ridge and opposing the ridge such that the first and second overhang cooperate with the ridge to impart friction to the flat strap and prevent removal, the opening between the first and second overhang (see Annotated Fig.) wherein the overhangs fold over like an upside-down G-shape in relation to the ridge (see Annotated Fig.), the overhangs are knobbed (see Annotated Fig.), and bottom edges of the overhangs and a top of the ridge intersect on an imaginary line running across the device (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 5. The slide of claim 1, wherein a void (see Annotated Fig.) is included on either side of the ridge, such that the flat strap is foldable down into the void for loading and unloading (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 6. The slide of claim 5, wherein the ridge is raised in respect to the voids and a bottom edge of the slide (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 7. The slide of claim 6, wherein when two sections of the flat strap are in the slide fiction of the knobbed overhangs and ridge against the flat strap prevent removal (see Fig. 1). Re: Claim 8. The slide of claim 7, wherein as tension is applied to the flat strap, the flat strap tends to flatten, providing force against the first and second overhangs and the ridge which translates to friction against removal (see Fig. 1). Re: Claim 9. The slide of claim 8, further comprising an opening between the first and second overhangs (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 10. The slide of claim 9, wherein the opening is aligned with the ridge (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 11. The slide of claim 10, wherein the flat strap is loadable through the opening by folding the flat strap and sliding edges of the flat strap into the voids on either side of the ridge (see Annotated Fig.). As for Claim 12, Ackermann discloses a slide for securing a flat strap, the slide comprising: a body section (see Annotated Fig.), the body section sized to receive the flat strap by sliding the flat strap through an open end (see Annotated Fig.), a ridge (see Annotated Fig.), the ridge on the body section; a first and second overhang (see Annotated Fig.), having an opening between them (see Annotated Fig.), the opening configured to receive a the flat strap (see Annotated Fig.) by folding the flat strap and wedging through (see Fig. 1), the first and second overhang on either side of the ridge and opposing the ridge such that the first and second overhang cooperate with the ridge to impart friction to the flat strap and prevent removal, wherein the overhangs fold over like an upside-down G-shape in relation to the ridge and the overhangs are knobbed (see Annotated Fig.), and the bottom edges of the overhangs and a top of the ridge intersect on an imaginary line running across the device (see Annotated Fig.). As for Claim 16, Ackermann discloses a method of using a slide, the method comprising: providing a slide (see Annotated Fig.), the slide including a body section (see Annotated Fig.), the body section sized to receive the flat strap by sliding the flat strap through an open end (see Fig. 1); a ridge (see Annotated Fig.), the ridge on the body section; a first and second overhang (62a and 62b), having an opening (see Annotated Fig.) between them, the opening configured to receive the flat strap by folding the flat strap and wedging through (see Annotated Fig.), the first and second over hang on either side of the ridge and opposing the ridge such that the first and second overhang cooperate with the ridge to impart friction to the flat strap and prevent removal, wherein the overhangs fold over like an upside-down G-shape in relation to the ridge and the overhangs are knobbed (see Annotated Fig.); bottom edges of the overhangs and a top of the ridge intersect on an imaginary line running across the device (see Annotated Fig.); folding a first section of a flat strap (see Annotated Fig.); inserting the first section of the flat strap through an opening between the first and second overhangs (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: folding a second section of the flat strap (see Annotated Fig.); inserting the second section of the flat strap through an opening between the first and second overhangs (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising: pulling of the flat strap (see Annotated Fig.); flattening the flat strap as a result of the pulling (see Annotated Fig.); providing force against the first and second overhangs and the ridge which translates to friction against removal as a result of the flattening (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising: folding the second section of the flat strap; removing second section of the flat strap through the opening (see Annotated Fig.). Re: Claim 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising: folding the first section of the flat strap; removing first section of the flat strap through the opening (see Annotated Fig.). PNG media_image1.png 630 624 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 5-12, and 16-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M UPCHURCH whose telephone number is (571)270-7957. The examiner can normally be reached 6AM-3PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID M UPCHURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698794
KEY-LOCKED CARABINER DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696959
AUTOMATIC RETENTION APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12677914
RETRACTABLE ZIPPER WITH Y-SHAPED TAPE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669145
Hook Lock And Method
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667687
DIRECTIONAL LOCK FOR INTERFACE HEADGEAR ARRANGEMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1036 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month