Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/395,032

DEVICE ENABLING DATA TRANSMISSION AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF DEPTH DATA, RGB DATA WITH THE REAL TIME AND METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Examiner
BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
E-Con Systems India Private Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
772 granted / 995 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
1069
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 995 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 06/26/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 9 and claims bellow are ejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 US 20220374366 A1. Regarding claims bellow D1 teaches 1, 9 A device enabling data transmission in a network communication, the device comprising: a plurality of sensors(106 and 102), wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a first sensor(102), a second sensor(one of the 106) and a third sensor (second one of the 106 or IMU or ultrasound), [0002] a processor(122) configured for: receiving, data sensed by each sensor of the plurality of sensors;[0054] stripping, a predefined data from the data received from each of the sensor;[0024] wherein stripping the predefined data comprises stripping a first line of data from the data received from each sensor;[0060](lidar and camera data include “ start addresses of headers, start addresses of the sensor data, and lengths occupied by the sensor data. ” ) combining, through an encoder each of the predefined data striped from the data received from each of the sensor for obtaining a combined data stream; and[0068+0054+0058] generating, through the encoder, an output data stream by using the combined data stream.[0054] it is important to note that the D1 teaches removing headers from the segments of the for example either camera data or Lidar data and then stitching segments of the segments for that sensor. But at the same time [0054] Explicitly teaches fusing LIDAR data with for example camera data. It is clear that and lidar data and each individual camera data will include header and therefore It will be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art to modify teachings taught by D1 to strip the headers form LIDAR , and individual camera data in order to fuse LIDAR and camera data and at the same time compress the combined data as it is dan for different segments of the image data or lidar data. 2, 10 The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first sensor of the plurality of sensors comprise a Time-of-flight (ToF) sensor[0058], a second sensor of the plurality of sensors comprise a Red Green Blue (RGB) image sensor[0058] and wherein a third sensor of the plurality of sensors comprise an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor.[0049] 3, 11 The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the data comprises a depth data sensed by a first sensor of the plurality of sensors, an image data sensed by a second sensor of the plurality of sensors and, an acceleration and angular velocity data by a third sensor of the plurality of sensors.[0058,0049] 6, 14 The device as claimed in claim 1, comprising: an encoder configured for encoding the output data stream before transmission.[0049] 7, 15 The device as claimed in claim 1, comprising: a transmitter configured for transmitting the output data stream to a host processor for reconstructing an image from the output data.[0078] 8. The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the device comprises an electronic device comprising a Time-of-Flight (ToF) camera.[0060] Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOVHANNES BAGHDASARYAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7845. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuqing Xiao can be reached at (571) 270-3603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOVHANNES BAGHDASARYAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 25, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693394
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING DISTANCE AND/OR VELOCITY OF OBJECT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12681151
LIDAR SENSOR SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681318
Optical Component and Laser Radar System
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674872
LIDAR SENSOR THAT MINIMIZES NOISE LIGHT WHEN TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING LIGHT
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669586
TWO-CHANNEL LIDAR SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 995 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month