DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-11, 16, 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Faccin et al. (U.S. Patent Application Number: 2021/0105064).
Consider claim 1; Faccin discloses a method implemented by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising:
causing an exchange of capability information (par. 29) with a control plane function of a network [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)], the capability information indicating a supported type of data transfer (par. 29; par. 66, lines 6-17) for coverage data (par. 60, lines 1-4), the coverage data indicating at least one of location or timing of a network coverage by a non- terrestrial network (NTN) node of the network (e.g. satellite links) [timing (par. 66, lines 20-24)];
processing, by using the supported type of data transfer (par. 66, lines 6-17), the coverage data [e.g. enable mobility tracking (par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 66, lines 18-20)]; and
causing communication with the NTN node (e.g. satellite) [e.g. enable mobility tracking for reachability (par. 66, lines 18-20)] based on the coverage data (par. 60, lines 1-4).
Consider claim 2; Faccin discloses processing selection information (par. 30, lines 6-14) that is received from the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 30, lines 1-4; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] and that indicates a selection of the supported type of data transfer (par. 30, lines 6-14; par. 66, lines 6-17) from the one or more data transfer types (par. 29).
Consider claim 3; Faccin discloses selecting the supported type of data transfer from the one or more data transfer types (par. 30, lines 6-14).
Consider claim 4; Faccin discloses the capability information (par. 29, lines 13-22; par. 30, lines 6-14) indicates that the UE supports at least one of a control plane or a user plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] for receiving the coverage data from the network (par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 66, lines 6-20).
Consider claim 5; Faccin discloses the capability information (par. 29, lines 13-22; par. 30, lines 6-14) indicates that the network supports at least one of a control plane or a user plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] for sending the coverage data to the UE (par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 66, lines 6-20).
Consider claim 6; Faccin discloses the supported type of data transfer corresponds to a control plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-17)], wherein the coverage data is received from the control plane function by at least using the control plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-17)], and wherein the control plane function includes a mobility management entity or an access and mobility management function [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-17)].
Consider claim 7; Faccin discloses the coverage data is received by a non-access stratum (NAS) layer of the UE (par. 28, lines 1-8; par. 44, lines 7-10), wherein the coverage data is received in multiple portions based on a control plane protocol other than a NAS protocol [e.g. SIP (par. 35, lines 3-12).
Consider claim 8; Faccin discloses the coverage data is transferred using a non-IP based mechanism or is received in a configuration update command message, an attach accept message (par. 66, lines 6-17), or a tracking area update accept message, and wherein the capability information is sent in a REGISTRATION REQUEST message (par. 66, lines 6-17), and wherein the coverage data is received in a REGISTRATION ACCEPT message (par. 66, lines 6-17).
Consider claim 9; Faccin discloses the coverage data is received in a message associated with a container type for transferring NTN node network coverage (par. 28, lines 1-7; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 63, lines 5-8), wherein the message includes a downlink NAS transport message that is received based on an uplink NAS transport message sent from the UE (par. 28, lines 1-7; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8).
Consider claim 10; Faccin discloses causing a completion message to be sent to the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] [e.g. the UE is now able to receive services (par. 66, lines 6-20)], the completion message indicating the procedure transaction identity (e.g. optional identity) and a second message identity (e.g. optional second identity) (par. 66, lines 6-20).
Consider claim 11; Faccin discloses a component to be implemented in an apparatus, the component comprising:
processing circuitry configured to:
cause an exchange of capability information (par. 29) with a control plane function of a network [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)], the capability information indicating a supported type of data transfer (par. 29; par. 66, lines 6-17) for coverage data (par. 60, lines 1-4), the coverage data indicating at least one of location or timing of a network coverage by a non- terrestrial network (NTN) node of the network (e.g. satellite links) [timing (par. 66, lines 20-24)];
process, by using the supported type of data transfer (par. 66, lines 6-17), the coverage data [e.g. enable mobility tracking (par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 66, lines 18-20)]; and
cause communication with the NTN node (e.g. satellite) [e.g. enable mobility tracking for reachability (par. 66, lines 18-20)] based on the coverage data (par. 60, lines 1-4); and
interface circuitry coupled with the processing circuitry (par. 100), the interface circuitry configured to communicatively couple the processing circuitry with another component of the apparatus (par. 100).
Consider claim 16; Faccin discloses a network comprising:
one or more processors (par. 111, lines 1-4); and
one or more memory storing instructions that (par. 111, lines 1-4), upon execution by the one or more processors (par. 111, lines 1-4), configure the network to:
exchange, by a control plane function of the network [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)], capability information with a user equipment (UE) (par. 29; par. 66, lines 6-17), the capability information indicating a supported type of data transfer (par. 29; par. 66, lines 6-17) for coverage data (par. 60, lines 1-4), the coverage data indicating at least one of location or timing of a network coverage by a non-terrestrial network (NTN) node of the network (e.g. satellite links) [timing (par. 66, lines 20-24)]; and
cause the coverage data to be sent to the UE (par. 66, lines 6-17) based on the supported type of data transfer (par. 29), wherein communication between the UE and the NTN node is facilitated based on the coverage data (par. 66, lines 6-24).
Consider claim 17; Faccin discloses the supported type of data transfer corresponds to a control plane [e.g. AMF (par. 29; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)], and wherein the coverage data is sent by the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-20)] by at least using the control plane or a non-IP based delivery mechanism [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)].
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 12-15, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faccin et al. (U.S. Patent Application Number: 2021/0105064) in view of Talebi Fard et al. (U.S. Patent Application Number: 2021/0385283).
Consider claim 12, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: process an address of the endpoint and a token received from the control plane function; and cause, based on the address, a request for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses process an address of the endpoint (par. 374, lines 7-22) and a token received from the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)]; and cause, based on the address (par. 374, lines 7-22), a request for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 7-22, 26-32)].
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Consider claim 13, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: determine, from a universal subscriber identity module, configuration information of the endpoint; and cause, based on the configuration information, a request for the coverage data to be sent.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses determine (par. 364, lines 1-6), from a universal subscriber identity module (par. 364, lines 1-6), configuration information of the endpoint (par. 364, lines 1-6); and cause, based on the configuration information (par. 364, lines 1-6), a request for the coverage data to be sent (par. 364, lines 6-10).
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including USIM, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Consider claim 14, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: process an address of the endpoint and a token received from the control plane function; and cause, based on the address, an SMS query for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses process an address of the endpoint (par. 374, lines 7-22) and a token received from the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)]; and cause, based on the address (par. 374, lines 7-22), an SMS query for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint [e.g. network (par. 187, lines 1-13; par. 374, lines 7-22, 26-32)].
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Consider claim 15, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: the coverage data is received from the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses the coverage data is received from the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function (par. 378).
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including a server, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Consider claim 18, as applied in claim 16; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: send, by the control plane function to the UE, an address of an endpoint and a token, the endpoint storing the coverage data.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses send, by the control plane function to the UE [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)], an address of an endpoint and a token [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 7-22)], the endpoint storing the coverage data [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 26-32)].
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Consider claim 19, as applied in claim 16; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: send, by the control plane function to the UE, an address of an endpoint and a token, the endpoint storing the coverage data.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses send, by the control plane function to the UE [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)], an address of an endpoint and a token [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 7-22)], the endpoint storing the coverage data [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 26-32)].
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Consider claim 20, as applied in claim 16; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: the coverage data is sent by the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function.
In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses the coverage data is sent by the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function (par. 378).
It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including a server, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network.
Wiedeman is another reference that discloses the inventive concept.
Conclusion
Any response to this Office Action should be faxed to (571) 273-8300 or mailed to:
Commissioner for Patents
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Hand-delivered responses should be brought to
Customer Service Window
Randolph Building
401 Dulany Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to Joel Ajayi whose telephone number is (571) 270-1091. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 7:30am to 5:00pm.
If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Lester Kincaid can be reached on (571) 272-7922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free) or 703-305-3028.
Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist/customer service whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600.
/JOEL AJAYI/
Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2646