Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/395,079

COVERAGE DATA TRANSFER FOR COMMUNICATIONS WITH A NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK NODE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Priority
Jan 31, 2023 — provisional 63/442,404
Examiner
AJAYI, JOEL
Art Unit
2646
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
490 granted / 636 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+46.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
674
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
75.6%
+35.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to Applicant’s amendment filed on April 23, 2026. Claims 1-20 are still pending in the present application. This action is made FINAL. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed April 23, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The argument features Faccin does not disclose that the supported data transfer type is about transferring the coverage data from the network to the UE. The examiner respectfully disagrees with the applicant’s statement and asserts that the claims are broadly written. Using the broadest reasonable interpretation, Faccin discloses that the supported data transfer type [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)] is about transferring the coverage data from the network to the UE [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)]. In view of the above, the rejection using Faccin is maintained as repeated below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11, 16, 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Faccin et al. (U.S. Patent Application Number: 2021/0105064). Consider claim 1; Faccin discloses a method implemented by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising: causing an exchange of capability information of a user equipment (UE) with a control plane function of a network (e.g. AMF) [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)], the capability information indicating a supported type of data transfer [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)] for transferring coverage data from the network to the UE [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)], the coverage data indicating at least one of location or timing of a network coverage by a non- terrestrial network (NTN) node of the network [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)]; processing the coverage data received by the UE from the network to determine at least one of the location or the timing of the network coverage [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configure to perform one or more mobility management and/or session management procedures with the core network using the MM/SM timers 715.” (par. 103, lines 1-4)], the coverage data being transferred from the network to the UE [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)] according to the supported type of data transfer [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)]; and causing communication of the UE with the NTN node based on the UE being in the network coverage [“In addition, the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to perform an initial attach procedure to attach to a base station (e.g….satellite gNB) within a RAN (e.g. a …non-terrestrial RAN).” (par. 103, lines 4-8)] according to the at least one of the location or the timing [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configure to perform one or more mobility management and/or session management procedures with the core network using the MM/SM timers 715.” (par. 103, lines 1-4)]. Consider claim 2; Faccin discloses processing selection information (par. 30, lines 6-14) that is received from the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 30, lines 1-4; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] and that indicates a selection of the supported type of data transfer (par. 30, lines 6-14; par. 66, lines 6-17) from the one or more data transfer types (par. 29). Consider claim 3; Faccin discloses selecting the supported type of data transfer from the one or more data transfer types (par. 30, lines 6-14). Consider claim 4; Faccin discloses the capability information (par. 29, lines 13-22; par. 30, lines 6-14) indicates that the UE supports at least one of a control plane or a user plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] for receiving the coverage data from the network (par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 66, lines 6-20). Consider claim 5; Faccin discloses the capability information (par. 29, lines 13-22; par. 30, lines 6-14) indicates that the network supports at least one of a control plane or a user plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] for sending the coverage data to the UE (par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 66, lines 6-20). Consider claim 6; Faccin discloses the supported type of data transfer corresponds to a control plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-17)], wherein the coverage data is received from the control plane function by at least using the control plane [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-17)], and wherein the control plane function includes a mobility management entity or an access and mobility management function [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-17)]. Consider claim 7; Faccin discloses the coverage data is received by a non-access stratum (NAS) layer of the UE (par. 28, lines 1-8; par. 44, lines 7-10), wherein the coverage data is received in multiple portions based on a control plane protocol other than a NAS protocol [e.g. SIP (par. 35, lines 3-12). Consider claim 8; Faccin discloses the coverage data is transferred using a non-IP based mechanism or is received in a configuration update command message, an attach accept message (par. 66, lines 6-17), or a tracking area update accept message, and wherein the capability information is sent in a REGISTRATION REQUEST message (par. 66, lines 6-17), and wherein the coverage data is received in a REGISTRATION ACCEPT message (par. 66, lines 6-17). Consider claim 9; Faccin discloses the coverage data is received in a message associated with a container type for transferring NTN node network coverage (par. 28, lines 1-7; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 60, lines 1-4; par. 63, lines 5-8), wherein the message includes a downlink NAS transport message that is received based on an uplink NAS transport message sent from the UE (par. 28, lines 1-7; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8). Consider claim 10; Faccin discloses causing a completion message to be sent to the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)] [e.g. the UE is now able to receive services (par. 66, lines 6-20)], the completion message indicating the procedure transaction identity (e.g. optional identity) and a second message identity (e.g. optional second identity) (par. 66, lines 6-20). Consider claim 11; Faccin discloses a component to be implemented in an apparatus, the component comprising: processing circuitry configured to: causing an exchange of capability information of a user equipment (UE) with a control plane function of a network (e.g. AMF) [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)], the capability information indicating a supported type of data transfer [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)] for transferring coverage data from the network to the UE [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)], the coverage data indicating at least one of location or timing of a network coverage by a non- terrestrial network (NTN) node of the network [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)]; processing the coverage data received by the UE from the network to determine at least one of the location or the timing of the network coverage [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configure to perform one or more mobility management and/or session management procedures with the core network using the MM/SM timers 715.” (par. 103, lines 1-4)], the coverage data being transferred from the network to the UE [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)] according to the supported type of data transfer [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)]; and causing communication of the UE with the NTN node based on the UE being in the network coverage [“In addition, the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to perform an initial attach procedure to attach to a base station (e.g….satellite gNB) within a RAN (e.g. a …non-terrestrial RAN).” (par. 103, lines 4-8)] according to the at least one of the location or the timing [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configure to perform one or more mobility management and/or session management procedures with the core network using the MM/SM timers 715.” (par. 103, lines 1-4)]; and interface circuitry coupled with the processing circuitry (par. 100), the interface circuitry configured to communicatively couple the processing circuitry with another component of the apparatus (par. 100). Consider claim 16; Faccin discloses a network comprising: one or more processors (par. 111, lines 1-4); and one or more memory storing instructions that (par. 111, lines 1-4), upon execution by the one or more processors (par. 111, lines 1-4), configure the network to: exchange, by a control plane function of the network (e.g. AMF), capability information with a user equipment (UE) [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)], the capability information indicating a supported type of data transfer [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)] for transferring coverage data from the network to the UE [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)], the coverage data indicating at least one of location or timing of a network coverage by a non- terrestrial network (NTN) node of the network [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)]; and cause the coverage data to be sent to the UE by the network [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)] using the supported type of data transfer [“…the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to generate and transmit via the transceiver 710 a registration request including one or more UE capabilities to the AMF in the core network…The UE capabilities (e.g. network type indication) may further indicate a set of one or more satellite types within the non-terrestrial network type supported by the wireless communication device 700.” (par. 101, lines 1-14)] to send the coverage data [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configured to receive and process a timer selection instruction from the AMF in the core network.” (par. 102, lines 1-3)], wherein communication between the UE and the NTN node is facilitated [“In addition, the communication and processing circuitry 742 may be configured to perform an initial attach procedure to attach to a base station (e.g….satellite gNB) within a RAN (e.g. a …non-terrestrial RAN).” (par. 103, lines 4-8)] based on the coverage data [“The communication and processing circuitry 742 may further be configure to perform one or more mobility management and/or session management procedures with the core network using the MM/SM timers 715.” (par. 103, lines 1-4)]. Consider claim 17; Faccin discloses the supported type of data transfer corresponds to a control plane [e.g. AMF (par. 29; par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)], and wherein the coverage data is sent by the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8; par. 66, lines 6-20)] by at least using the control plane or a non-IP based delivery mechanism [e.g. AMF (par. 44, lines 7-10; par. 63, lines 5-8)]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 12-15, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faccin et al. (U.S. Patent Application Number: 2021/0105064) in view of Talebi Fard et al. (U.S. Patent Application Number: 2021/0385283). Consider claim 12, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: process an address of the endpoint and a token received from the control plane function; and cause, based on the address, a request for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses process an address of the endpoint (par. 374, lines 7-22) and a token received from the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)]; and cause, based on the address (par. 374, lines 7-22), a request for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 7-22, 26-32)]. It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Consider claim 13, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: determine, from a universal subscriber identity module, configuration information of the endpoint; and cause, based on the configuration information, a request for the coverage data to be sent. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses determine (par. 364, lines 1-6), from a universal subscriber identity module (par. 364, lines 1-6), configuration information of the endpoint (par. 364, lines 1-6); and cause, based on the configuration information (par. 364, lines 1-6), a request for the coverage data to be sent (par. 364, lines 6-10). It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including USIM, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Consider claim 14, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: process an address of the endpoint and a token received from the control plane function; and cause, based on the address, an SMS query for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses process an address of the endpoint (par. 374, lines 7-22) and a token received from the control plane function [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)]; and cause, based on the address (par. 374, lines 7-22), an SMS query for the coverage data and the token to be sent to the endpoint [e.g. network (par. 187, lines 1-13; par. 374, lines 7-22, 26-32)]. It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Consider claim 15, as applied in claim 11; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: the coverage data is received from the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses the coverage data is received from the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function (par. 378). It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including a server, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Consider claim 18, as applied in claim 16; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: send, by the control plane function to the UE, an address of an endpoint and a token, the endpoint storing the coverage data. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses send, by the control plane function to the UE [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)], an address of an endpoint and a token [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 7-22)], the endpoint storing the coverage data [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 26-32)]. It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Consider claim 19, as applied in claim 16; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: send, by the control plane function to the UE, an address of an endpoint and a token, the endpoint storing the coverage data. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses send, by the control plane function to the UE [e.g. AMF (par. 382, lines 7-13)], an address of an endpoint and a token [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 7-22)], the endpoint storing the coverage data [e.g. network (par. 374, lines 26-32)]. It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including an address and token, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Consider claim 20, as applied in claim 16; Faccin discloses the claimed invention except: the coverage data is sent by the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function. In an analogous art Talebi Fard discloses the coverage data is sent by the control plane function based on a transfer of the coverage data from an operation and maintenance server of the network to the control plane function (par. 378). It is an object of Faccin’s invention to provide a method for managing communication. It is an object of Talebi Fard’s invention to provide a method for establishing communication sessions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of Faccin by including a server, as taught by Talebi Fard, for the purpose of effectively providing services in a telecommunication network. Wiedeman is another reference that discloses the inventive concept. Conclusion Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to Joel Ajayi whose telephone number is (571) 270-1091. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 7:30am to 5:00pm and Friday 7:30am to 4:00 pm. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Jeanette Parker can be reached on (571) 270-3647. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free) or 703-305-3028. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist/customer service whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600. /JOEL AJAYI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641180
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VERIFICATION OF AN AFFILIATION OF A CALL INITIATOR WITH AN ORGANIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12615579
METHOD TO IMPROVE UE PERFORMANCE BY REDUCING SCAN ON LEGACY GSM/WCDMA
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12598480
COVERAGE TUNING BASED ON UPLINK AND DOWNLINK BALANCING
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598585
METHOD FOR SUPPORTING PAGING EARLY INDICATION WITH PAGING SUBGROUPING ASSISTANCE AND USER EQUIPMENT THEREOF
8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578420
METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR MEASURING POSITION ON BASIS OF ANTENNA
2y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.8%)
2y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month