Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/395,682

Computing Device

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 25, 2023
Examiner
LEA EDMONDS, LISA S
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lenovo (Singapore) Pte, LTD
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
658 granted / 759 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§102
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 20 recites the limitation "base housing forms a first bar, the display housing forms a second bar" in lines 3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the specification. Applicant is directed, at least, to paragraph [0042] as a teaching of the location of the first bar and the second bar. In the example of FIG. 5, the first bar may be defined by a bar length that is between the pivots 672 and 674 while the second bar may be defined by a bar length that is between the pivots 572 and 574. It is noted that first bar is defined between the pivots 672 and 674 are disclosed in relations to the display housing 600 and the second bar is defined between the pivots 572 and 574 are disclosed in relations to the base housing 500. It is unclear if the mistake is in the location of the first and second bars or the base and display housings. Also, it is noted that the same issue is in claim 3. Because claim 3 further defines the first and second housing as the base housing and display housing respectfully. It raises the issue of the proper location of the first and second bars as taught in paragraph [0042]. However, independent claim 1 is not limited to the which housing is the first and/or second housing. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: see the reason as set forth in the 09/18/2025 Non-Final Rejection. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA LEA-EDMONDS whose telephone number is (571)272-2043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LISA LEA-EDMONDS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2847 /LISA LEA-EDMONDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 2026-01-05
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 25, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591275
SUPPORT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, FLEXIBLE DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591269
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585306
DEVICE TO ALLOW SENSORS T0 OPERATE WHEN LID IS CLOSED
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578756
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572176
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.7%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month