Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/396,292

GLOVEBOX

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Examiner
ESQUIVEL, DENISE LYNNE
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
60 granted / 70 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
93
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 70 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to application No. 18/396,292, filed on 12/26/2023. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. Claims 1-10 and 12-20 have been rejected as follows. Claim 11 is objected to. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “52” has been used to designate both storage bin door in Fig. 3-10 and bin side portion in Fig. 4. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: reference number “46” designating “pair of curved side extensions 46” in the specification paragraph [0039]. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: “64” is described as both the interior surface 64 of the tray housing (specification paragraph [0038]) and the interior 64 of the storage bin (specification paragraph [0041]). “motor” is described as both “motor 80” (specification paragraphs [0048] & [0049]) and stepper motors (specification paragraphs [0049] and drawing Figures 3, 6, & 8-10) Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 recites the limitation "the storage bin" in lines 1 and 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The claim lacks a clear antecedent basis because claim 16 does not recite a storage bin. For purposes of examination, the claim is interpreted as referring to “a storage bin”. Claim 18 is also rejected by virtue of dependency as it depends from claim 17 that is rejected under 35 USC 112(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zweiniger et al (US Patent No. 4,630,857). Regarding claim 1, Zweiniger et al discloses a glovebox (column 2, lines 35-37; Fig. 1 & 6) for a vehicle, the glovebox comprising a frame (2, Fig. 6; column 2, lines 38-40); and a storage bin (3, Fig. 6) translatable between a first position and a second position (see annotated figure below; column 3, lines 56-68) relative to the frame (2, Fig. 6) and rotatable between a closed position and an open position (see annotated figure below; column 4, lines 64-66) relative to the frame (2, Fig. 6). PNG media_image1.png 634 952 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Zweiniger et al further discloses wherein the storage bin (3, Fig. 6) is attached to the frame (2, Fig. 6) via a linkage (11, 14, Fig. 6) configured to permit movement of the storage bin (3, Fig. 6) between the first position and the second position (see annotated figure above; column 3, lines 56-68). Regarding claim 3, Zweiniger et al further discloses wherein the linkage (11, 14, Fig. 6; 16, 17, Fig. 1-4) includes a four-bar link (column 4, lines 60-62). Regarding claim 8, Zweiniger et al further discloses the glovebox (Fig. 1 & 6, column 2, lines 35-37) incorporated in a vehicle (abstract). Claims 1-2, 4-6, 8-10, 12-13, 15-17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by McCarthy et al (US 2018/0361942). Regarding claim 1, McCarthy et al discloses a glovebox (1000, Fig. 2A/B; [0029]) for a vehicle (V, Fig. 1A/B; [0028]), the glovebox comprising a frame (700, Fig. 3 & 5; [0030], lines 4-6); and a storage bin (body 200 and cover 300; [0029], lines 4-6) translatable between a first position (300, Fig. 5A/4A; [0032], lines 3-5) and a second position (300, Fig. 5B/4B) relative to the frame (700, [0032], lines 3-5) and rotatable between a closed position (200/300, Fig. 5A/4A; [0032], lines 1-3) and an open position (200/300, Fig. 5G/4G; [0032], lines 1-3) relative to the frame (700, Fig. 5A/5G; [0030], lines 6-9). The storage bin is interpreted as including the components of a bin body 200 and cover 300 which can act separately or together since applicant has not set forth any structure limiting or defining the storage bin. Regarding claim 2, McCarthy et al further discloses wherein the storage bin (body 200 and cover 300, Fig. 3 & 5; [0029], lines 5-6) is attached to the frame (700, Fig. 3 & 5) via a linkage (272, 5, 370, 7, Fig. 3 & 5; [0066]) configured to permit movement of the storage bin between the first position (300, Fig. 5A) and the second position (300, Fig. 5B). Regarding claim 4, McCarthy et al further discloses the glovebox (1000, Fig. 4-5) further comprising a tray (100, Fig. 4-5) movable between a retracted state (100, Fig. 5A) and an extended state (100, Fig. 5D), the tray (100, Fig. 5) extending from the frame (700, Fig. 5) in the extended state (100, Fig. 5D). Regarding claim 5, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 4 above, and further discloses wherein the tray (100, Fig. 5) is movable into the extended state (100, Fig. 5D; [0032], lines 3-5) when the storage bin is in one of the first position and the second position (300, Fig. 5B) and is prevented (100, Fig. 5A; [0032], lines 9-12) from moving into the extended state when the storage bin is in the other of the first position (300, Fig. 5A) and the second position. Regarding claim 6, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 4 above, and further discloses a motor ([0046], line 8) configured to move the tray (100; [0045], lines 5-15) between the extended position and the retracted position (by releasing latch assembly 400 to allow tray 100 to extend; [0045], lines 5-15). Regarding claim 8, McCarthy et al further discloses the glovebox (1000, Fig. 2A/B) incorporated in a vehicle (V, Fig. 1A/B). Regarding claim 9, McCarthy et al discloses a glovebox (1000, Fig. 2A/B; [0029]) for a vehicle (V, Fig. 1A/B; [0028]), the glovebox comprising a frame (700, Fig. 3; [0030], lines 4-6); a storage bin (body 200 and cover 300; [0029], lines 4-6) translatable between a first position (300, Fig. 5A/4A; [0032], lines 3-5) and a second position (300, Fig. 5B/4B) relative to the frame (700, [0032], lines 3-5); and a tray (100, Fig. 4-5) movable between a retracted state (100, Fig. 5A) disposed within the frame and an extended state (100, Fig. 5D) extending from the frame, the tray (100, Fig. 5) movable into the extended state (100, Fig. 5D; [0032], lines 3-5) when the storage bin is in one of the first position and the second position (300, Fig. 5B) and prevented (100, Fig. 5A; [0032], lines 9-12) from moving into the extended state when the storage bin is in the other of the first position (300, Fig. 5A) and the second position. The storage bin is interpreted as including the components of a bin body 200 and cover 300 which can act separately or together since applicant has not set forth any structure limiting or defining the storage bin. Regarding claim 10, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 9 above, and further discloses wherein the storage bin (body 200 and cover 300, Fig. 3 & 5; [0029], lines 5-6) is attached to the frame (700, Fig. 3 & 5) via a linkage (272, 5, 370, 7, Fig. 3 & 5; [0066]) configured to permit movement of the storage bin between the first position (300, Fig. 5A) and the second position (300, Fig. 5B). Regarding claim 12, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 9 above, and further discloses wherein the storage bin is rotatable relative to the frame (700, Fig. 5A/5G; [0030], lines 6-9) between a closed position (200/300, Fig. 5A/4A; [0032], lines 1-3) and an open position (200/300, Fig. 5G/4G; [0032], lines 1-3). Regarding claim 13, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 9 above, and further discloses a motor ([0046], line 8) configured to move the tray (100; [0045], lines 5-15) between the extended position and the retracted position (by releasing latch assembly 400 to allow tray 100 to extend; [0045], lines 5-15). Regarding claim 15, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 9 above, and further discloses the glovebox (1000, Fig. 2A/B) incorporated in a vehicle (V, Fig. 1A/B). Regarding claim 16, McCarthy et al discloses a vehicle (V, Fig. 1A/B; [0028]) comprising an instrument panel (IP, Fig. 1B & 2A; [0029], lines 1-4); a door (300, Fig. 4-5) rotatable relative to the instrument panel (IP, Fig. 4-5) between a closed position (300, Fig. 5A/4A; [0032], lines 1-3) restricting entry into a storage compartment (200, Fig. 5A/4A) and an open position (300, Fig. 5G/4G; [0032], lines 1-3) permitting entry into a storage compartment (200, Fig. 5G/4G), the door (300, Fig. 4-5) translatable between a first position (300, Fig. 5A/4A; [0032], lines 3-5) and a second position (300, Fig. 5B/4B) relative to the instrument panel (IP, Fig. 4-5); and a tray (100, Fig. 4-5) disposed within the instrument panel (IP, Fig. 4-5) and movable between a retracted position (100, Fig. 5A) disposed within the instrument panel (IP, Fig. 5) and an extended position (100, Fig. 5D) extending from the instrument panel (IP, Fig. 5), the tray (100, Fig. 5A; [0032], lines 9-12) prevented from moving from the retracted position into the extended position by the door (300, Fig. 5A) when the door is in one of the first position (300, Fig. 5A) and the second position and permitted to move from the retracted position into the extended position (100, Fig. 5D; [0032], lines 3-5) when the door (300, Fig. 5B) is in the other of the first position and the second position (300, Fig. 5B/D; paragraph [0065]). Regarding claim 17, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 16 above, and further discloses a storage bin (body 200 and cover 300, Fig. 3-5; [0029], lines 5-6) coupled (through the base 700) to the instrument panel (IP, Fig. 3-5) via a linkage (272, 5, 370, 7, Fig. 3 & 5; [0066]) configured to permit movement of the storage bin between the first position (300, Fig. 5A) and the second position (300, Fig. 5B). The storage bin is interpreted as including the components of a bin body 200 and cover 300 which can act separately or together since applicant has not set forth any structure limiting or defining the storage bin. Regarding claim 19, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 16 above, and further discloses a motor ([0046], line 8) configured to move the tray (100; [0045], lines 5-15) between the extended position and the retracted position (by releasing latch assembly 400 to allow tray 100 to extend; [0045], lines 5-15). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7, 14 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McCarthy et al (US 2018/0361942) in view of Hudson (US Patent No. 2,789,861). Regarding claim 7, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 4 above. However, McCarthy et al does not expressly disclose wherein the tray includes at least one hinge configured to permit the tray to be folded on itself. Regarding claim 14, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 9 above. However, McCarthy et al does not expressly disclose wherein the tray includes at least one hinge configured to permit the tray to be folded on itself. Regarding claim 20, McCarthy et al discloses all of the claimed limitations of the invention as claimed in claim 16 above. However, McCarthy et al does not expressly disclose wherein the tray includes at least one hinge configured to permit the tray to be folded on itself. Hudson teaches a glovebox (11, Fig. 3 & 5) wherein the tray (20, 20’; Fig. 3 & 5) includes at least one hinge (21, 21’; Fig. 3-6) configured to permit the tray (20, Fig. 2) to be folded on itself (Fig. 2) in the analogous field of the claimed invention of vehicle glovebox storage bins. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the glovebox tray of McCarthy et al by providing it with a hinge as taught by Hudson. Doing so would improve versatility of the tray by allowing the extensible tray to unfold for expanded surface area and to fold on itself for compactness and ease of storage. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The primary reason for indication of allowable subject matter in claims 11 and 18 is the inclusion of limitations reciting “the linkage includes a four-bar link” in combination with a tray movable between a retracted state disposed within the frame and an extended state extending from the frame when the storage bin is in the first position or the second position as set forth in the claims. The base reference of McCarthy et al (US 2018/0361942) cannot be modified with a four-bar link without destroying how the device operates. Such limitations, in combination with the rest of the limitations of the claim, are not disclosed or suggested by the prior art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gross et al (US Patent No. 5,558,385) discloses a glovebox with a four-bar linkage (11, 12) that has both rotational movement and translational movement about a frame. Evans et al (US 2010/0148531) discloses a glovebox with four-bar linkage mechanism (Fig. 4A-E) configured to pivot and translate the glovebox (see abstract). Igari (JP-H07112643-A), Schulz (DE-102011118576-A1), Zhang (CN-204296593-U), Li (CN-206327273-U), Plavetich et al (US Patent No. 4,902,061), and JP-4271885-B2 disclose glovebox and tray combinations. Shibata (US Patent No. 9,511,718) discloses a bin (2) that translates and pivots downward when opened (column 8, lines 60 through column 10, line 11). Rigner et al (US Patent No. 8,714,093) discloses a hinged tray (Fig. 4-5). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Denise L Esquivel whose telephone number is (703)756-5825. The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Thursday 7:30 am-5:00 pm, alternate Fridays 7:30 am-4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.L.E./Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Mar 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583406
VEHICLE STRUCTURAL MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576926
PNEUMATIC BLADDER AERODYNAMIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576699
CABLE DEPLOYABLE ACROSS VEHICLE DOOR OPENING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565272
REAR PART STRUCTURE OF VEHICLE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559189
Motorcycle Canopy
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 70 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month