Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/396,361

PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSING AND/OR STIMULATION PROBE AND METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Examiner
WU, TONG E
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
447 granted / 640 resolved
At TC average
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
676
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 640 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Park (US 2023/0173260). PNG media_image1.png 142 405 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Park discloses the same invention as claimed (Figures 2B-C shown above for example), including a physiological sensing and/or stimulation probe (abstract), comprising: a probe body (Figures 2B-C); a first electrode, disposed on the probe body (Figure 4: e.g. 17-1); a second electrode, spaced apart from the first electrode and having an outer surface facing away from the first electrode (Figure 4: any other electrode); and an adjusting unit, wherein the second electrode is movably disposed on the probe body via the adjusting unit so that an angle between a normal direction of the outer surface of the second electrode and a central line of the probe body is adjustable (Figures 2B-C), thereby allowing an electrical field generated between the first electrode and the second electrode to be adjustable. Regarding claims 2-4, Park discloses a flexible unit as recited (Figures 2C, 2F, 4, 5E-F). Regarding claim 5, Park discloses the adjusting unit comprises at least two adjusting components as recited (Figures 2F, 3, 4, 5E). Regarding claim 6, Park discloses at least three adjusting components (Paragraph 49; Figures 2D-E: four operation wires). Regarding claim 7, Park discloses the central line of the probe body passing through the geometric center of the second electrode as recited (Figure 4: central axis passes through geometric center of any ring electrode). Regarding claim 8, Park discloses the first electrode is a ring shape as recited (Figure 4). Regarding claim 9, Park discloses at least two mounting channels as recited (Figures 2D-E, 3, 4; Paragraph 49). Regarding claim 11, Park discloses stimulating as recited (Paragraphs 7-9, 18). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park (US 2023/0173260) in view of Robinson (US 2016/0038733). Regarding claim 10, Park does not explicitly disclose operating the deep brain stimulation lead to perform sensing. However, Robinson teaches a mechanically adjustable deep brain stimulation lead may also be used for sensing a variety of positions (Paragraphs 2, 39, 47, 59, 62, 65, 78, 124), in order to assess the suitability of the electrode positions. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Park as taught by Robinson to include sensing as recited, in order to assess the suitability of the electrode positions. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Rezai (US 2005/0075681), Martens (US 2010/0100152), King (US 2010/0114283) show mechanically adjustable leads. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Eugene T Wu whose telephone number is (571)270-5053. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carl Layno can be reached at 571-272-4949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Eugene T Wu/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589243
OCULAR DEVICES AND CONTROLLER INTERFACES FOR OCULAR THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12558535
ADAPTIVE DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION USING MOVEMENT DESYNCHRONIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12558035
SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING FIT OF A WEARABLE DEVICE ON A USER BY MEASURING THE CURRENT DRAW TO AMPLIFY A BIOPOTENTIAL SIGNAL SENSOR AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551106
AUTOMATED DEVICE PAIRING USING BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551167
TECHNIQUES FOR ADAPTIVE SENSORS OF A WEARABLE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 640 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month